Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Nuayman ibn Amr
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 17:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Al-Nuayman ibn Amr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, very un-referenced - RichT|C|E-Mail 15:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. - RichT|C|E-Mail 15:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete has a brief mention in a book, but that's about it from what I can find. Also, the article is extremely non-neutral. It would have to be fundamentally re-written to meet the guidelines IMO. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:39, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment, a number of sites discuss the hadiths associated with him ie. here, here, and here (note: i am not saying that they are all useable), a merge/redirect to List of Sahabah may be appropriate (unfortunate that it is only a list of names with no details of the individual companions)? Coolabahapple (talk) 06:06, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep a notable figure in Islam. I've some offline historical Islamic resources, let me try cleaning it up and improving it. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 03:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as per AaqibAnjum.— Hammad (Talk!) 04:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 22:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 22:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep the ms.wiki article appears long and well sourced, but I don't read the languages involved. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More comments from editors familiar with the subject field are needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Juliette Han (talk) 07:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Relisting comment: More comments from editors familiar with the subject field are needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Juliette Han (talk) 07:28, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.