The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SoWhy 10:22, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Akhi Khatun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This articles don't pass WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 05:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 07:34, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 07:34, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 07:34, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 09:18, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Fails NFOOTY, but passes wider GNG. Significant, non-routine coverage can be found in the following sources amongst others:

1. Dhaka Tribune - dedicated article on the player

Also seems to be a number of other lengthy sources in non-English language sources already noted in the article, I would want some confirmation these are not sufficient for GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is WP:TOOSOON. fails subject specific guidelines, specifically WP:NFOOTBALL which specifically excludes youth football as inherently notable. Coverage is WP:ROUTINE and per WP:ANYBIO does not indicate he has made widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record of football. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - weak - probably scrapes by on GNG. GiantSnowman 09:57, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The player has not played for the senior national team, She has just played for the youth national team. A player playing for the senior national team or played in a fully professional league is notable.Not someone who has represented the youth team (FIFA competition etc does not matter). Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:41, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep why? No senior caps, and no professional caps, and no noteworthy recognized contribution.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Fails WP:NFOOTY but passes WP:GNG there is coverage in the Dhaka Tribune like Akhi Khatun: Bangladesh's Maldini in the making and further we have not got into the local Bengali Language media coverage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I fail to see how she passes GNG, she is 15 years old, outside of Bangladesh? Inside of Bangladesh? I fail to see significant coverage. Govvy (talk) 14:18, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep She meets GNG guidelines. There is no such thing as wider GNG. Someone notable in Norway may not be notable in Mongolia but that is inconsequential.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:47, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete What is notable about the player? I truly don't understand.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment- In Bangladesh there aren't many female professionals. So it becomes news in the Bangladesh when one achieves some amounts of success. This leads to more coverage than other countries and that coverage allows her to pass the GNG threshold. I mean Bangladesh just got its first female commercial and first female military pilot a few years ago and both were front page news.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Youth team appearances are not considered notable because many players who play for their youth team do not go on to become professional. It has been well established over many years that youth caps do not confer notability.and this player is yet to play in a fully pro league .so this is simply fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:NSPORT . No indication that subjects have garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. The Coverage is nothing but WP:ROUTINE. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 04:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep Tough because of the language barrier, but it appears there are multiple feature articles on her specifically which pass WP:GNG. SportingFlyer talk 05:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:YOUNGATH. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.