The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:50, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Akhbar e Khawateen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This weekly magazine does not appear notable. Zero refs. (Almost zero content; in retrospect, it could have been prodded). Tagged for notability since May. Epeefleche (talk) 07:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Urdu-language magazine article with no indication of notability or references provided. I found no significant coverage focused on the subject in web searches. Dialectric (talk) 08:53, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Actually, it couldn't be PRODed because there was a previous AfD nomination (I just learned this myself, recently!) That aside, the keep argument in the previous AfD was that it exists, and therefore, there must be sources! I'm afraid that's just bad reasoning, and it was a weak keep at that. Anydangway, I also couldn't find any evidence that this magazine was notable, but I'll wait and see if anyone else chimes in. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 05:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• All good points.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:04, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Neutral if verified it should be kept as all magazines and newspapers are notable, if not then delete and recreate when that is the case. No significant edit history would need to be preserved.LuciferWildCat (talk) 00:21, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• magazines and newspapers are not inherently notable. There is no specific notability guideline for publications on wikipedia, so they have to meet the general notability guideline. Dialectric (talk) 16:37, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.