The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 04:32, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ajaaw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Approved by geonames, and it shows up as a dot on some UN maps; but there's nothing there, and I've come across no significant non-map/clickbait info. Mangoe (talk) 01:28, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:00, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep there's a dot on OSM and while the roads around there are imprecise, there appears to be human activity where the map says it is. SportingFlyer talk 04:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as the subject does not meet the general criteria for notability nor the criteria for geographic locations. -The Gnome (talk)
• Delete I would prefer something more than a UN map or geonames to satisfy WP:V, even setting the bar really really low. Prince of Thieves (talk) 11:37, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.