The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:25, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aimée Leigh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress with questionable notability. Most of her roles appear to be uncredited with no major role at all. Wgolf (talk) 18:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Wgolf (talk) 18:03, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It is long past time when all articles sources only to IMDb should be gone from Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:28, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:33, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Seems to have had no significant roles. Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:46, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - the article pretty much makes the case for deletion with the roles she is apparently most known for being ones that are minor. The best I could find was this little bit in this book on Hellraiser. That's well short of the significant coverage that would be needed to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 03:08, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.