The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Zia Malik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail to provide WP:RS so fails WP:GNG. Fails WP:NPOL too. Greenbörg (talk) 14:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Local politician, not enough to meet WP:NPOL. Only reference is a directory, so article is essentially unsourced.PohranicniStraze (talk) 15:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 15:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 15:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a local office holder fails to meet WP:Politician and WP:GNG. --Saqib (talk) 17:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.