The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 02:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abode Solicitors Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search for sources yielded 1 google news hit. Fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Companies, and England. LibStar (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The heady claims are not sourced. This is a small law firm: I once worked at a firm of which I was one of four lawyers and a bunch of staff people. This is run of the mill. Bearian (talk) 03:30, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The PROD makes this article unqualified for "soft" deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 22:42, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 09:48, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.