Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abba, Imo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)UY Scuti Talk 15:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abba, Imo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to verify the page's content and the vilallage lacks any kind of notablility Meatsgains (talk) 22:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:59, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Per nom. There is also a complete absence of references. This article has been up for nearly ten years but shows no signs of improvement to its name. Parsley Man (talk) 05:49, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep  There are a several sources online in which people describe themselves as being from Abba.  There is also a widely replicated story about a king dying two days before inauguration in one of the communities of Abba.  I added two references, one that defines the term, and a Nigerian government reference that shows the term being used officially.  Anything else is an editing problem.  Unscintillating (talk) 19:53, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, I tried and failed to find an official government source a while ago, but found enough to indicate that the place existed and was likely officially recognized, and so was hesitant to vote delete. Thanks to Unscintillating's referencing, the subject now passes WP:GEOLAND standards. Cleanup needed but that's not the purpose of AFD. Antepenultimate (talk) 20:56, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.