The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no delete suggestions. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 02:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Christmas Kiss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television film, does not have significant coverage by independent sources, per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 01:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Reviews at Common Sense Media and Dove are cited in the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw. While I don't think that two reviews will fully constitute as significant coverage, it is the bare minimum described by WP:NF. Thanks @Donaldd23: for the finds. BOVINEBOY2008 21:51, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.