The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.. — CharlotteWebb 21:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable super-hero. Pkomano 16:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Golden-age comics detective who is technically part of the DC universe. Google shows a small number of hits, but it does verify the basic facts of the character and is more than one might expect for something published in the 40s. Here is a biography, for example. No convincing reason given to delete. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep just because you've never heard of it doesn't make it non-notable. 23:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. What a bizarre article to go after for a first edit. —Xezbeth 07:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Any superhero is notable. 11kowrom 15:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. All comic characters should have an entry. Rhino131, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. For historical purposes. Brian Boru is awesome 19:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.