The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Webster & King (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Author has a conflict of interest (seems to be one of the company's principals), article reads like an advertisement, refs do not establish notability. XXX antiuser 06:03, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk)  · @305  ·  06:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the lack of reliable sources. Using the search links provided above, I could find no sources on Google Web or Google News Archive. The Google Books search returned irrelevant results, such as a book published in the 1800s — however, this company was founded in 2008. Cunard (talk) 06:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Advertisement page quite blatantly created by one of the founders of the company. Not relevant and unsourced. McMarcoP (talk) 07:59, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this. The article is also spam. Joe Chill (talk) 15:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.