The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 16:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tsem Tulku (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be entirely "sourced" from his own websites tsemtulku.com and kechara.com. Lack of notability. VictoriaGrayson^Talk 21:50, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - As nominator.VictoriaGrayson^Talk 21:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Struck duplicate !vote: your nomination is your !vote. Comment at will, though. Esquivalience ^t 23:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-using the web of trust, it says that the websites are scams. Of course, it is user-generated, so don't blame me if I am wrong. Even if it is wrong, it is self-published.--ABCDEFAD_✉ 22:13, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ABCDEFAD_✉ 22:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Tentative delete unless it can actually be improved and my searches found nothing explicitly good here, here and here. I'm not an expert with the article's subject but I'm not seeing much improvement here. SwisterTwister talk 05:19, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, self-published, clear COI on page; this is entirely self-promotion of a non-notable individual Ogress _smash! 08:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.