Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shangri-La Hotel Singapore
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Shangri-La Hotel Singapore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Procedural nom to list separately the various hotels bundled together in an earlier nomination. Rationale for deletion remains insufficient notability and of no encyclopedic value (see WP:NOT#TRAVEL). Pascal.Tesson 19:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The article does read like an advertisement for the hotel and could very easily be a copyedit. The only problem with deleting the article is that the Shangri-La Hotel in Singapore is a world famous hotel. While it does not have some of the history as other famous hotels, in the 20th and 21st century its notability should warrant some sort of article. Perhaps a face-lift would be a more constructive alternative for anyone willing to take this on. If no one does, then it should be deleted as per nom. Mkdwtalk 20:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Hotel is notable for being the root for the name of the Shangri-La Dialogue, among other things. Yes, it needs a clean up etc but it should not be deleted. --Rifleman 82 03:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable material here, and sourced. DGG (talk) 06:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. Chensiyuan 13:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. —Sengkang 15:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Besides the above, the hotel's architecture is even notable enough to be selected to be featured in a publication and exhibition by the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Singapore. Non-notable and unencyclopedic?--Huaiwei 16:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per above, flagship, and first hotel in an international chain. Luke! 02:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.