The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep due to improved sourcing. WP:CRYSTAL does not apply due to sourcing, and meets WP:N due to improved sourcing. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 01:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rendavathu Padam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Crystal and rather promotional. Night of the Big Wind _talk 19:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per nominator.That's me! ^{Have doubt?} Track me! 12:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article, feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:32, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. What's wrong with the article? It has several reliable, third party sources, principal photography has commenced, no POV... What else? Johannes003 (talk) 17:28, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • No movie? Night of the Big Wind _talk 18:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sorry, I didn't understand! What do you mean? Johannes003 (talk) 18:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think Night of the Big Wind means that the movie has not been released as of this point. Folgertat (talk) 22:20, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  18:18, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Per WP:NFF, a future film may have an article if principal photgraphy has commenced and the production itself is notable. This film is notable, several notable, reliable, secondary, independent sources have been added. Johannes003 (talk) 22:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.