The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 22:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Reji Koshy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails WP:ENTERTAINER. Hannah Reji Koshy only played a supporting role in her debut and its not even notable. As to satisfy WP:ENTERTAINER, the person should have significant roles in multiple notable films. JackTracker (talk) 12:48, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as I myself PRODed it and planned to nominate for AfD since none of this is better for WP:ENTERTAINER. SwisterTwister talk 17:15, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep : the article is all about an Indian Beauty pageant contestant and an actress on Malayalam film industry. The actress were too seen in an interview about her film on the popular talk show Onnum Onnum Moonu on Mazhavil Manorama.--Helper V1 (talk) 17:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Helper V1 : There's not any special weightage/more priority for beauty pageant contestant's (As on the world their are lot of beauty pageant contests carrying every year, if we considered all contestants to be encyclopedic it will not be practical). As on the case of Hannah Reji Koshy as Entertainer, the first clause of WP:ENTERTAINER is failing. JackTracker (talk) 22:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep : I think there is some notability here. Masterofroks (talk) 12:50, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notability established. AusLondonder (talk) 02:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article's references support WP:GNG. Article could use expansion, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 19:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.