The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Speedily deleted by ArnoldReinhold upon creator's request. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 13:09, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glass makers and brands (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Improper disambiguation page. Dictionary definition plus subject already served by category "Glass makers and brands." Dougie WII (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. KurtRaschke (talk) 01:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The entire article: "Glass makers and brands may refer to companies, entrepreneurs, businesspeople, inventors, trademarks, and brands in the area of glass." That's it. Makers may be "companies, entrepreneurs, businesspeople, inventors" and brands may be "trademarks and brands". It's clearly not a stub, because there's nothing else that can be usefully said... or has been usefully said. Mandsford (talk) 03:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I created the page, but after seeing your concerns I agree that it may be deleted without loosing anything. I am not all that familiar yet with the Wikipedia policy.--Afluegel (talk) 10:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Gavin Collins (talk) 11:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.