The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 05:40, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GDT speedster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads as promotional both sources seem like promos. Various unsourced lines Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:05, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Transportation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:41, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The car has received some reliable coverage here, but everything else I could find seemed to be trivial mentions, which don't establish the subject's notability. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per TechnoSquirrel69. Mooonswimmer 15:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.