Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Destroyer (Babylon 5)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Almost nobody wanted to keep the present content, and the disambiguation links are now at Destroyer (disambiguation). Sandstein 14:26, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Destroyer (Babylon 5) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Redundant to Warlock class destroyer and Victory class destroyer. Doesn't appear that there's any information in the stubby article that needs to be merged so just delete it. Otto4711 14:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- create redirect Just H 16:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to disambig with links to each class? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 16:05, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- disambig works for me. FrozenPurpleCube 16:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I doubt anyone is going to type "Destroyer (Babylon 5)" as a search term (I found the article as a random result). Still say delete this page and if disambig is desired then do so on the already-existing Destroyer_(disambiguation) page. Otto4711 17:09, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Which, oh, scrolling down that page I see someone already did a couple of hours ago. Otto4711 17:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Eh, I have no idea what somebody will type, but disambigs are cheap, as cheap as redirects. If there was just the one type of destroyer, that'd be one thing, simple redirect. With two (plus who knows how many added in the future if the series is further developed), I think a disambig is the easy choice. FrozenPurpleCube 17:19, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, the disambig is fine, though the reason I created the stubby was because previously, the B5 destroyer articles linked to the destroyer Wikipedia page that is about the 20th century warship class, which has nothing to do, either in form or function, with the destroyers on Babylon 5 (on Babylon 5, they serve as a cross between aircraft carriers and battleships). I'll go ahead and throw in a link on the Destroyer disamb page for the Omega Destroyer, which is the one primarily seen on B5.--Raguleader 17:29, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- disambig should do. Tonytypoon 01:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not needed. CRGreathouse (t | c) 09:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as disambiguation page. Eluchil404 08:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Add to Destroyer (disambiguation) with a redirect to Babylon 5 and an inclusion there of the term (or definition). SkierRMH 05:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Convert to disambiguation per SkierRMH. His idea sounds good. --Wizardman 06:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 13:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.