The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. PhilKnight (talk) 22:57, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contested prod. This artist fails WP:MUSIC, has yet to release an album, and lacks non-trivial coverage by reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 07:44, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom as fails WP:N and WP:V. Weak Keep and cleanup don't know how I missed the huge amount of coverage. Although not all the GNews stuff is about this person a reasonable amount is and is from reliable 3rd party sourcing. I'm gonna grab a couple and add them to the article. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 20:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Which of the deletion criteria does the nominator think this article comes under? Mostlyharmless (talk) 04:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. A very cursory search finds non-trivial coverage in The Guardian, the New York Times, and the International Herald Tribune. I'm sure if I looked for more than 30 seconds (literally, that is all it took me to find them - Google News, "Amanda Blank", all dates), I could find a bunch more. Mostlyharmless (talk) 04:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep. Substantial non-trivial musical collaborations mean she would sail past the spirit of WP:MUSIC even if not the letter. Fortunately, because of the rakes of press coverage, she aces the latter too. Strong candidate for improvement, not deletion. tomasz. 17:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Keep. As per the others, and yes - her collaborative efforts are pretty well known and with major artists, and she does have a solo EP out (for "Get It Now"). And with that album coming out... --Grahamdubya (talk) 18:14, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.