Welcome to Zfish118's Talk Page!
Hello! --Zfish118 ^⋉talk 03:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I saw that you had posted a peer review for the Catholic Church article, but have already nominated the article for a GA status. Would you like for the peer review link to be closed? I had the same issue for a while with the Alexander Hamilton article when I had nominated for a GA status. LeftAire (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@LeftAire: Yeah, thanks! I couldn't figure out how to withdraw it myself when I noticed it was still open. I will try to be around if you have any questions about the article. --Zfish118 (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Catholic Church you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LeftAire -- LeftAire (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Catholic Church you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Catholic Church for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LeftAire -- LeftAire (talk) 22:21, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Catholic Church (estimated annual readership: 1,000,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! LeftAire (talk) 22:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The actual amount estimated was 1075684 views was based of a 4-mo. estimate (as of 4/4/2015 had 268,966 views in a 90 day period this year). Congrats! LeftAire (talk) 22:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@LeftAire: Thank you - I am quite honored! --Zfish118 (talk) 18:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to craft a template for Code of Canon Law based on your {{CCC}} but do not see where your lookup table for {{CCC}} is to use as an example. Can you point me in the right direction? –BoBoMisiu (talk) 21:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Very cool! The table can be found here: Template:CCC/TOC logical selection Template:CCC/TOC lookup (I had to dig for it myself). I also added a link to the documentation. Good luck! --Zfish118 (talk) 21:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TYVM –BoBoMisiu (talk) 19:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, all these dictionary sources are dubious. I removed a quotation from the Hippie dictionary. Needless to say, that isn't reliable at all and the definitions are too biased. Cheers. Outedexits (talk) 14:56, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Those articles badly needed to be analyzed critically by someone competent on the religious aspects of these topics. Some sections of Our Lady of Fátima are still poorly sourced and dodgy, so I hope that you'll continue your work in these areas. See you around! KarlPoppery (talk) 17:11, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! –Zfish118^⋉talk 17:13, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note saying thanks for always weighing in on the longest running naming dispute on Wikipedia. You always have very reasonable points, which add a lot of value to every conversation. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that you conferred me barnstars on two different occations - two times the Christianity barnstar. Not sure if this was the intention? Anyway, thanks! Chicbyaccident (talk) 22:38, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Both were intentional. Congrats! –Zfish118^⋉talk 16:15, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot! Much appreciated. Chicbyaccident (talk) 16:43, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For much help to Wikipedia around Christianity topics. PPEMES (talk) 18:36, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! ☺️ –Zfish118^⋉talk 02:28, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zfish118,

I just made a suggestion based on your comment in Opus Dei.

Please check. Jesuitsj (talk) 09:54, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Connecting

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you would like to chat with other editors, you can join the Wikimedia Community Discord server. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions.

Happy editing! Signed, Rschen7754 02:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is an early edition and a late edition of that article. There is some difference between the two, probably one is abridged to fit the space available. — Jacona (talk) 13:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your huge contribution to the structure of the Heartland Christian Academy article. I expanded it while extremely short on time and was focused on getting sources into the article to show its WP:N. You have certainly made it tons better! — Jacona (talk) 14:30, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Church has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Binghamton Whalers.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]