Hi Yny501! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit ^beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, "MediaWiki:Visualeditor-preference-enable". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:12, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Stygian20s (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

<nowWiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Lordddddd". The reason give for Lordddddd's block is: "Vandalism-only account.". </nowWiki>

• Blocking administrator: Nick-D (talk • blocks)

---

Accept reason: I've cleared the autoblock. PhilKnight (talk) 10:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Boeing Commercial Airplanes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources before making such changes in the future. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at EVA Air, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The Airbus official Press release clearly says the order is not firm, if you have a better source, provide it! SideshowBob7 (talk) 09:29, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yny501. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yny501. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yny501. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think that the content on your userpage is good as it seems to accuse others of being hired by the CCP and PAP and calling them idiots. Would you mind changing this? Thanks. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 05:25, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nigos Is it really necessary? The existence of those two groups are well-known to be fact, and I'm not accusing anybody in particular. Yny501 (talk) 20:31, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a violation of WP:POLEMIC and can result in a block if reinstated. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 00:03, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CaradhrasAiguo: You just have all the time in the world to do this don't you? I see that you really like spamming Wikipedia policies on everybody when you disagree with them. I'd warn you that it's not really appropriate behaviour, and besides you're not even at the level where you can decide if I'm allowed to be blocked or not. I'd wait for someone that actually has rights to make a clear decision before I change anything. Lay off the delusions of grandeur. Yny501 (talk) 00:08, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know about your existence until I saw you had reverted Taekhosong's edit. Perhaps you should first deflate your own sense of self-importance before asking others to lay off delusion of grandeur that they do not possess. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 00:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@CaradhrasAiguo: At the very least I'm important enough to warrant you deleting my user page - a pretty uncommon sight on Wikipedia. You're the one that's making me important if anything, and you're just implying you're involved in some of the behaviours mentioned - again, I have not put any value judgement on those behaviours - and you feel bad that somebody else can see it, which again isn't my problem. Yny501 (talk) 00:16, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When your previous page was literally quoted as certain recently active editors resemble idiotic tools, an unambiguous violation of the second point of WP:POLEMIC (Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors...), it is hard to take anything you say seriously. This is as naked of a display of WP:WIKILAWYERING as I have seen anywhere on this branch of Wikimedia. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 00:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aiguo Again, you don't read the policy in full. WP:WIKILAWYERING states: use and misuse of the term - offence vs insult: the former is argumentative. I fail to see how your second sentence achieves this result. You are literally just putting policies on the table to show that you know the rules, but you don't really read anything in full, do you? Also, since you have the time, maybe you should respond to what I put on your talk page. Yny501 (talk) 00:29, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: talk page content deleted as user has not responded but acknowledged receipt. Matter closed. Yny501 (talk) 01:54, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy, as you did at Special:Diff/923377567. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ST47 (talk) 04:01, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yny501:, your comments at Special:Diff/923377567 were way over any reasonable line of WP:NPA or WP:HARASSMENT, and your repeated reference to them as "Aiguo" when you are presumably aware of the note at the top of their talkpage asking not to do so also feels a lot like harassment to me. I'm blocking you for 31 hours for the personal attacks, and I'd recommend that you make every effort to avoid each other going forward, at least until tempers cool. It's clear that this isn't an isolated incident, and the next step is likely an interaction ban. ST47 (talk) 04:05, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stygian20s (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Were the comments on Horse Eye Jack by my reporter reviewed? I hope everyone is held to the same standards. I agree my comments in that edit were not helpful, but I was reacting to the previous attacks made by the reporter and I apologise for being out of line. I used the term 'unhinged' in the context of my reporter's comments which said something about 'Sinophobic, pan-Green militants' and 'fascist USA sympathisers', which in retrospect was inflammatory at best. I did not intend to harass when using the name 'Aiguo', but if this is perceived as harassment I will stop doing so. Also the reporter made a reference to their talk page - I have no intention of editing their talk page, so I don't see how that's a get out of jail card. I will try to start assuming good faith in them again in the future, and I hope they will do the same (which I frankly haven't seen right from the beginning). Finally, is there a mechanism for determining the block length, and is there a way to only appeal the length of the block? Yny501 (talk) 06:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please read WP:NOTTHEM. You spend most of this unblock request talking about other people when you should be talking about yourself. The block will end on 11:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC). Any admin can adjust the block length, but you typically need to appeal the block for that to happen. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:11, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]