Hello, Xdenizen. You have new messages at Unomi's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have replied to your post on my talk page. Thanks again Unomi (talk) 12:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Xdenizen, I don't know who you are or if we've ever encountered each other before. That said, I am very troubled by your incivility and personal attacks on me here. Please consider expunging them next time you log in. Thank you. -- əʌləʍʇ əuo-ʎʇuəʍʇ ^ssnɔsıp 06:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 17:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help? (OMGILOVEPEAS (talk) 03:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Hi Xdenizen, I just visited the home page on the way to looking something up and the orange flash appeared across the page top: "You have new messages".

I clicked it out of curiosity and got User talk:88.108.230.219 and your message was "Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sophia Bush." It was dated 3 March 2008.

I dare say you will be much more aware, 3 years later, of this point; but I am leaving this brief note just to underline how pointless it is to leave notes to un-logged-in IP addresses. The way the internet infrastructure has worked for almost a decade, with IP 4 addresses rapidly running out as usage has grown, there may be thousands of ISP subscribers using a given IP address temporarily on one particular day each --- allocated dynamically when they log on to their particular ISP.

The fact that this note to "88.108.230.219" has sat for nearly three years and nobody has been to look at it before (otherwise it wouldn't flash that it was a new message) shows that whoever committed the sin you refer to probably never got that IP address again and never had any chance at all of seeing the message.

As it happens, there is something to celebrate today, which is another reason why it's worth me bothering to write this today: The Daily mail online has a news story datelined 8:25 AM on 3rd February 2011 which has the headline The Internet will run out of numerical addresses 'in the next 24 hours' where it explains that it is all right as long as the change to the new IPv6 IP addresses goes ahead smoothly. But it probably won't, as the story attempts to explain (but there are better places to find out about that than the daily Mail)...

Anyway, have a good year. And may all our IPv6 addresses be happy ones. But the chances of any Wikipedia note to a non-logged-in IPv4 address user ever being seen by the person you intended it for are, from today (I guess), about 4 billion times smaller than they were yesterday (when they were already only one in several billion)!

Iph (talk) 15:15, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has not edited in a year and a half, so I daresay he is not going to see this message of yours either. rʨanaɢ (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:46, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hello

I had edited an article, John Dill, adding quoted material, etc.

I would like the external link citation to show just the article title and author--not the URL.

Please help remedy the editing issue.

Thank you!

Dean Taylor

Stonewhite 06:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stonewhite (talk • contribs)

Some time ago you participated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajkumar Kanagasingam. As the article has recently been recreated, and nominated again for deletion, you are invited to participate in the new discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajkumar Kanagasingam (2nd nomination). —Psychonaut (talk) 10:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?

1. Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
2. Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
3. Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

boi. is someone trynna steal ur page orrrr?

Thegoofymovie (talk) 22:57, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]