I would strongly advise you to avoid 'Angela' (or in this case her sockpuppets AR and Nescar9.) She's a very angry young woman and I was quite serious about her being a total nutter. Like for example the whole bit she is perseverating about with the Yugo was a comment that an MTF friend made about how her sex drive changed (that is was like going from a Jag to a Yugo when she went on E/Spiro.) Though I think Angela is a bit unbalanced in that her other favorite subject to edit was some bizarre kind of Asian porn about women being ejaculated on or something called Bukkake.

As long as she doesn't start editing her transphobic nonsense into the transgender articles she is mostly harmless.NickGorton 08:49, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You may find a userfied version of the deleted box in my user space at User:Tomyumgoong/ubx/nocirc, feel free to subst or transclude it if you wish. Tomyumgoong 07:11, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I *really* liked that userbox. -- WiccaIrish 18:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't replace the non-standard use of italics for quotations. As the Wikipedis Manual of Style says: "There is normally no need to put quotations in italics unless the material would otherwise call for italics (emphasis, use of non-English words, etc.)." --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that! It's a habit and just personally feel it looks better is all, but it's OK. -- WiccaIrish 18:18, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK. I must admit that I hate it, so it's lucky for me that the MoS doesn't like it either. I'm not always that lucky... --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:40, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing the quote over at User:Swatjester/Quotes. I'd have missed it. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 14:28, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say hi! Always nice running into another trans Wikipedian, even if you do prefer only one space after a full stop. --Marumari 20:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi.

It looks like you added information to the Two-Spirit page about Apache languages, beliefs, influence from European culture. I was curious about the source for this. Can you look it up?

Thank you – ishwar  (speak) 06:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Men as Women, Women as Men: Changing Gender in Native American Cultures by Sabine Lang, pgs. 291, 293, 318, 328. Two-Spirit People: Native American Gender Identity, Sexuality, and Spirituality edited by Sue-Ellen Jacobs, Wesley Thomas, and Sabine Lang, pgs. 236-251. The Spirit and the Flesh: Sexual Diversity in American Indian Cultures by Walter L. Williams, pgs. 4, 39-41. List of primary sources: Changing Ones: Third and Fourth Genders in Native North America by Will Roscoe, pg. 224. -- WiccaIrish 10:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi. thanks. i'll check them out. peace – ishwar  (speak) 15:07, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw your edit to shemale and would like to invite you to join WikiProject LGBT studies. We would be happy to welcome you! Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 22:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems wikibooks is the appropriate place to put them, a search reveals a number of guides and other video game related material: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Game+guide&go=Go --Crossmr 20:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh jeeze, you're right. I'll try to work on cleaning it up (I'm not clear on how Wiktionary works, so hopefully I won't mess up). Let me know if I screw up. --Miskwito 00:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please cite the sources for the recent additions. Perhaps it could also go up alongside the claim for most venomous rather than at the end. Cheers. Shyamal 04:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the beaked sea snake and the inland taipan: [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16]. As you can see from these sites there doesn't seem to be a consensus. BTW, the lower the LD50 the more toxic. -- WiccaIrish 06:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great, that is quite a handful. Look forward to see the replacement of the superlatives with more suitable wording. cheers. Shyamal 09:19, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:FraggleRockS3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from referring to the edits of others as "vandalism" when they are made in good-faith. The edits of Jordanjames clearly do not fit Wikipedia's definition of vandalism. Perspicacite 07:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is not debateble. Removal of tags without first discussing it and coming to a consensus (vandalism) and POV-pushing are not acceptable. NPOV violations are not vandalism until the user repeatedly reinserts the statements. It is also unfortunate when Jordanjames/99.244.13.233 will not respond to requests for discussion. Due to the look of his talk pages and his silence I consider his edits as being in bad faith, you may assume good faith if you so choose. But I'd rather you not dictate to me what I can and cannot call an abusive user's actions. -- WiccaIrish 08:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do it again and I'll have an administrator take action. Perspicacite 08:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do what again? Is this all of your case? It is doubtful that an administrator would do much, if anything. I'll have no problem reporting silly, baseless threats. Don't threaten people. -- WiccaIrish 09:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking at my edit on Two-Spirit but even if you didn't like my edit, you should integrate the stuff you don't dislike instead of just reverting. Somewhere that's written as WP policy or guideline. Anyway, you can look at my recent edit. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ephilei (talk • contribs) 00:53, August 22, 2007 (UTC).

I have integrated it. Although I replaced "winkte" with two-spirit. -- WiccaIrish 01:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:FraggleRockS3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unless I'm metasathisizing patothagically even in fixing it. SBHarris 03:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm... I only linked a word in that article, and it wasn't "macrocytic." Wrong person. -- WiccaIrish (talk) 04:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 01:47, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WiccaIrish,
I'd like to inform you of this discussion, which relates to your contributions to Two-Spirit.24.22.141.252 (talk) 09:03, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re Lang (1998):[17]24.22.141.252 (talk) 03:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your response. Might you refactor it, though, to avoid breaking up my post? This has the effect of disrupting my chain of thought and separating my comments from my signature. I have no trouble with you writing in your own post, "24.22.141.252 wrote: …", quoting me, then rebutting it, but I would prefer that my posts remain unaltered, if that's possible. Thanks.24.22.141.252 (talk) 07:14, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've undone your refactoring of my post.[18] Feel free to add quotes to your own points if you feel they need context.24.22.141.252 (talk) 21:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Theron!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 20:15, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Valley View Early Childhood Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Jprg1966 ^(talk) 16:13, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WiccaIrish. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WiccaIrish. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]