User talk:Wataana
February 2012
A sockpuppet of DavidYork71 (talk · contribs). See edit history for clear edit pattern consistent with past socking. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 08:48, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Wataana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
?? No common element between this and thatWataana (talk) 09:16, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wataana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Shouldn't take this long for someone independent of the original admin to review this, should it?Wataana (talk) 20:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Reviewed above. Jayron32 21:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your request for a review. The thread is Block review. Thank you. Mattinbgn (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)