Archives

1

Vrac, Human Resources (gallery) has been nominated for proposed deletion before, so it doesn't qualify for this process. Feel free to take it to articles for deletion. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:45, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops I missed that, thanks. AFD it is. Vrac (talk) 04:49, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vrac, I added Human Resources (Non-Profit) to your deletion nomination. Please have a look at this second page to see if it changes your mind. I doubt it will. Thanks, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 15:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, I'm going to wait and see what Mr. Troutman comes up with before I weigh back in. Vrac (talk) 20:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		Humor Barnstar!
		Für exzellente Humor auf Talk:Samira Samii ... this made me smile, and this made me laugh. Danke schön! Sam Sing! 23:22, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't see your note about no references for this article until today and it's now been deleted. I based the page on a translation of the article about him on the Spanish wiki:

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisandro_Aristimu%C3%B1o

Is there any way to resurrect the page? MagistraMundi (talk) 10:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@MagistraMundi:, Your best bet is probably to ask the deleting admin User:Graeme Bartlett if they will restore the article into your user space. Here is the deletion record for reference:

"17:04, 15 January 2015 Graeme Bartlett (talk | contribs) deleted page Lisandro Aristimuño (Expired BLPPROD, concern was: Unsourced BLP)"

Cheers, Vrac (talk) 11:51, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've done that. MagistraMundi (talk) 10:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbari Roma Nord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Skyfireinteractive (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Doris Brendel ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Skyfireinteractive (talk) 11:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi i am a bit confused with how to present the draft article on Doris Brendel in the required format. Could you please give me some assistance in this.

Cheers

Rick Skyfireinteractive (talk) 11:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Skyfireinteractive: The best advice I can give would be to follow those two help articles I cited in the draft comments: WP:LAYOUT and WP:REFBEGIN. Or you could follow the example of any biographical article in Wikipedia on a well-known person. Regards, Vrac (talk) 14:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Katya1812 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Swmusic ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Vrac, I've made the revisions requested for Draft:Jeff von der Schmidt as requested. However, I am concerned about the duplication from other sources of items such as titles of projects, which cannot be changed or edited. Can you look over the submission and give me your opinion as to whether we have addressed the copyright issues adequately? Many thanks, katya1812 (name changed from swmusic)

Katya1812 (talk) 20:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I think you can resubmit it. A few other things you can do to make it conform to standards: move the external links section below the references section and remove all the links except jeffvonderschmidt.com (see WP:EXTERNAL LINKS. Regards, Vrac (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katya1812 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vrac,

Sorry to have not gotten back to you more quickly after your review of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Pluribus_Networks.

I have added a fair amount of information to that page with cited references including Forbes, Red Herring, Business Insider, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Oracle and Intel.

I believe we are as significant or more than other companies listed including Pica8 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pica8) and Cumulus Networks (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumulus_Networks), both of which are listed on WIkipedia.

Your consideration and guidance are greatly appreciated.

Best Regards,

Jason Lackey 408jay (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

fr:Liste de Pieds-Noirs célèbres est proposé à la suppression. --Agatino Catarella (talk) 08:29, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per the talk page and revision notes, I had enlisted the assistance of multiple editors and administrators in making this page as encyclopaedic as possible. Please accept my apologies if you found it to be anything but! However, I feel that the CSD were not appropriate to apply here; with its large number of references, significant notability of subject, and the extent to which I worked within the community to get feedback prior to posting it, I would appreciate an undeletion (or your support in WP:REFUND), even if you ultimately wish to support an AfD for this article. Within that AfD, if there are serious concerns of any type, I will endeavor to address them.

Jouster  (Talk) 14:49, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jouster: Sorry I've completely forgotten what this was about, I suggest following the refund process. I'm not an admin so I can't undelete. Vrac (talk) 15:34, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

• it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave references, they were generally of low quality for one of the following reasons

• They were affiliate or self-editable, like LinkedIn.
• They were reputable, like Bloomberg, but were just repeating the company claims
• They were reporting interviews with company chiefs rather than providing independent comment
• The were low quality sites of dubious provenance, blogs or forums

• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.

• I can see no financial or employment data, which would help to establish notability, it's just about what you are trying to sell, rather than factual data
• Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: high-performance private cloud infrastructure underlying this solution (not in the reference).. provide custom, personalized services" to enterprises he saw as being "ignored" by other providers (quoting the chairman is hardly an independent fact) and BlackMesh launched a new service to offer developers (sales talk for they sell)

I'll restore the text here shortly for you to fix Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:55, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimfbleak: I think you intended this message for User:Jouster, I was the one who nominated the article for deletion. Vrac (talk) 06:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, my bad, feel free to delete the above. I'll delete the sandbox too, sorry

Hello Vrac, you recently deleted the curator/contributor tables from the zingmagazine wiki page. I work for the founder/editor/publisher for zingmagazine, Devon Dikeou, and she asked me to create these tables, which directly link to the respective projects on the zingmagazine website. These tables have become a valuable resource for the zingmagazine staff, its past contributors, and its fans. Please let me know what I can do to prevent these tables from being deleted in the future.

Please read Wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest. The information is not encyclopedic, Wikipedia is not a directory, nor is it a webhost for intranet-type information. Regards, Vrac (talk) 22:40, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page is linked in the topic title. Thanks--Taeyebaar (talk) 21:44, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I think you might have accidentally added the AfD for Riogate to the June 23 log twice. Just wanted to let you know that I've reverted it. Thanks, Pishcal — ♣ 00:35, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, twinkle failed in the middle of its run so I reverted the edit to Riogate and re-ran it, didn't know about the log... Vrac (talk) 00:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I've been having a few issues reporting users to AIV myself recently. Cheers, Pishcal — ♣ 00:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I declined the proposed deletion of Carriage Hill, a page that you placed a PROD template on because of the following concern:

There is very little to no context identifying the subject of the article and has been tagged for speedy deletion per CSD A1. Having two completely different deletion requests open at the exact same time is not ideal.

If you would like to discuss this, please post a message on my Talk Page. I will see it there. Thank you. Wiki you now, Wiki you later! (talk) 00:55, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have declined another page you tagged for PROD, this time it is Church Fall Festival. However, I declined it for a totally different reason. My concern is:

This is a blatant hoax. I am a Christian myself and this does not exist anywhere in my church calender I have tagged it for speedy deletion per CSD G3.

Again, discussion is always welcome on my Talk Page. Wiki you now, Wiki you later! (talk) 01:03, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiki you now, Wiki you later!: May I suggest that you spend some time watching and !voting in deletion discussions to familiarize yourself with deletion policies/guidelines/procedures before you start de-prodding and tagging things for speedy deletion. This de-prod, csd, afd runaround is not a productive use of community time. Vrac (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 12:39, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quinto Real (place), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for patrolling new pages, Wikipedia appreciates your help. However while we encourage editors to patrol new pages, inappropriate tagging of articles for deletion is considered disruptive. Editors are allowed to declined inappropriate speedy deletion request and its often not constructive for the nominator to replace the template on the article. The best way to deal with issues like this when a nominator disagree is to initial a discussion on the article's talk page or on the talk page of the editor who declined the request stating why they feel the page is eligible for deletion under a particular criterion. Don't edit warring, its considered disruptive and could result in a block. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 14:52, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikicology:Then state your case why you disagree on the talk page like the template says and leave it for an admin to decice. Vrac (talk) 14:58, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I approve, no longer exists. Please proceed.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. postdlf (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nigel Cox (author), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Responsibility. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vrac. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Cloud-based lending, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:35, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FreeRangeFrog: I hesitated to CSD it but it was written by an account called LendKey and both the references are about LendKey, so someone hijacked a trendy-sounding neologism for self-promotion. "Cloud-based lending" isn't a notable topic any more than "Internet-based lending" or "Lending using computers".. Conceivably it's a redirect to Financial Technology or Loan but it's a stretch... Vrac (talk) 20:46, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but the criteria for deletion must me met, otherwise it's not eligible. Maybe we can find a suitable redirect target? Quite honestly I don't think the term is widespread enough. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:00, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll send it to Financial technology, I spent some time looking before I CSD'd it and that was the best I could come up with. Vrac (talk) 21:05, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or reinstate maintence templates to articles for issues that do not exist. 82.9.185.151 (talk) 20:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's start with the easy one: the article is indisputably an orphan, so you should not have removed the orphan tag. If you have some doubt about that, check out Wikipedia:Orphan for the definition . As for context, the article is not written for users with no knowledge of the subject, see Wikipedia:Make technical articles understandable. In fact I think it's a good candidate for a selective merge to an article like Error detection and correction which gives some background explanation of how, why, where. Vrac (talk) 21:05, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Promart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alain Passard

added a link pointing to Breton

Philippe Legendre

added a link pointing to 8th arrondissement

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know that I had to decline your PROD on Sezion for procedural reasons. The article had been suggested for a PROD in the past (2013-10-08, disputed via removal 2013-10-09) and is thus ineligible. However, I think that the article is sufficiently promotional in nature to qualify for a G11 promotional speedy deletion, which I am about to do.

In the future, don't forget to check the article's history before proposing deletion via PROD, as any article that has been PRODded and the PROD gets disputed/removed is permanently ineligible for future PRODs. –Darkwind (talk) 11:03, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I do a lot of these and always check, I just missed this one. Vrac (talk) 11:56, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of motorcycle manufacturers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Juery]] (1930s-1960s0
• *[[Harley-Davidson]] — (1905-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Val d'Aran may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the slopes of [[Aneto|Aneto mountain]]) and passes underground at the ''[[Forau de Aigualluts]]''). It then reappears in the Val dera Artiga before reaching the Val d'Aran, then through France and

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:45, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

, Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fidelity Investments, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NPOV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For your work to expand 2015 Colombia helicopter crash using reliable independent sources and thus demonstrate its Notability, I hereby award you this Barnstar. YSSYguy (talk) 02:44, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vrac,

Thank you for your feedback. I will change my username from WikipediaNOVA. I didn't know this was a violation of Wikipedia's rules. Do you work for Wikipedia? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikipediaNOVA (talk • contribs) 20:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, OK, I changed my Username. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sara M. Davin (talk • contribs) 20:25, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sir, I've researched. They said to "discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page." This is, I assume, your talk page. If it is not, please direct me. I do not want to violate any rules and my lawyer/friend indeed says that I am not. Please let me know what rules you think I violated. I would very much like to know so we can solve this issue amicably and fairly. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sara M. Davin (talk • contribs) 20:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sara M. Davin: Content disputes are resolved through discussion on the article talk pages, that would be Talk:Nova Science Publishers. There is also the issue of conflict of interest that must be discussed. The default state of the article is the status quo (i.e. before you made your edits) until the issue is resolved, please stop edit warring and discuss on the Nova Science Publishers talk page. If you continue to revert you may be blocked from editing. Vrac (talk) 20:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see now. Thank you. I will be posting on this page in the upcoming weeks, because there is a lot of false information. But I believe, like you have been doing, that I can post on anybody's page. You are posting on my talk page right now :) Again Vrac, nothing wrong is being done and would argue for you to stop editing until this is resolved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sara M. Davin (talk • contribs) 20:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sara M. Davin: Wikipedia has a conflict of interest policy that you should read. The article stays unchanged until these issues are resolved on the article's talk page. Perhaps you are not familiar with Wikipedia's editing guidelines, this is the procedure that is followed. Vrac (talk) 20:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vrac, why should what's written on wikipedia stay unchanged if its untrue? Michael — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelAdamSmith (talk • contribs) 21:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was intrigued by your comments at the Cara AFD. I don't read or write or speak French so if you can update the article with some of the links you provided and add the award (Officier) he received so as to make the article better, I will certainly consider withdrawing the nomination. Yours, Quis separabit? 01:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rms125a@hotmail.com: I updated the article with some content and references. It's still a stub, but at least it is sourced. The frwiki article for him has lots of content but is woefully under-sourced (as is often the case over there...) Vrac (talk) 02:37, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. It looks a lot better. I didn't have to withdraw the nom, obviously, as it was a keep vote. Yours, Quis separabit? 13:39, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vrac. Recently, I made some edits in the BNP Paribas article, and, seeing you already edited it, I'll ask adivice to you. I removed the section "Paribas Sentenced for Conspiring to Violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Trading with the Enemy Act" and moved the content to other section within the article because the incident addressed there was already covered in other sections: "Founding of BNP Paribas till date: 2000–present" and "Criticism" and in my opinion it gives the article an overbearing negative bias. However, the editor responsible for the first addition didn't consider my point relevant, and he thinks the creation of a new section is valid in reason of its significance. To avoid an edit war, I reverted the article to its first instance and opened a talk page discussion to give all the involved parts the oportunity to participate. What do you think? Do I have to "drop the stick" in this or not? Regards, --Urbanoc (talk) 11:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I gave my opinion on the talk page; I agree with you that the section should be removed. Cheers, Vrac (talk) 02:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Vrac, I already left a response there. Let's see is someone has something to bring into the discussion. --Urbanoc (talk) 02:00, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported for vandalizing my entry. So stop doing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FredTheBiped2 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reported where exactly? Vrac (talk) 12:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly note for you on the talk page of the Nova article:

Well, I should answer that - reading carefully enough my proposal - I say in all clarity "The result ranked Nova among the top global book publishing companies according to their output (rank 6 out of 100), and a lower medium average citation rate (0.25; rank 58 out of 100)." I think this sentence summarizes both sides of the heated arguments here on this page in a civilized, polite and acceptable manner, supported by solid peer-reviewed and published evidence. Emotions alone are certainly not sufficient to write a good Wikipedia article, and remember as well that my proposal also integrated the earlier criticism section on a 1:1 basis, without any changes. I am sorry to contradict Wikipedia editor DGG in a friendly way in an important minor detail: SENSE talks about "decent INTERNATIONAL" publishers. Whether we like it or not, the SENSE Consortium has a right to be represented here with what they say on a 1:1 basis as well. Sense, after all, IS a major consortium of very respected Dutch scholarship, and what they say has ALSO a weight. One cannot overrule their judgement by simply misrepresenting it. Decent is not lowest. Al Andaluz Toledano (talk) 10:55, 9 October 2015 (UTC) RegardsAl Andaluz Toledano (talk) 10:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've just renamed all those product pages Product (Company) as the syntax Company Product is not correct in Occitan (we'd rather say Word de Microsoft or Maps de Google, but as all are foreign words - and neither Microsoft nor Google have made any effort to provide an Occitan-language version of their products - it's better to use parentheses). And I'm still wondering about the eligibility of ads in the wikipedia :) Best regards. --— J. F. B. ^{(me´n parlar)} 06:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, como esta todo? I pinged you but I wonder if it maybe never went through therefore I thought I would notify you again in case you wanted to comment (no one else has in the last week). Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 04:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I remember seeing the ping but must have gotten distracted with something else. Vrac (talk) 20:57, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article is gone, what else you need mistah? --Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 01:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I, we, need you to stop behaving like Wikipedia is your personal playground. Closing an AFD yourself, on your own COI article, is just silly. Vrac (talk) 01:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article is gone, and the way it was going to be closed was obvious, so I just saved it from going into Wikipedia's deep asshole, and moved it to my userspace. Is there a problem with that? Can you just stop discrediting my comments just because I am the oh-it's-a-fucking-COI-dickhead-let's-just-drive-them-nuts-for-being-a-douche. --Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 01:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've been around more than long enough to know what is wrong with doing a non-admin closure on an AFD for an article with which you are WP:INVOLVED and have a conflict of interest. You also know this isn't going to end well for you, do you want to get blocked? What's up with that? Vrac (talk) 01:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vrac, I know, I've just gotten annoyed enough with these Chilean guys who don't let me do anything here without being scrutinized. The article was written on good faith. It had to be gone, yes, it had to be gone, I should have probably not written that [the article], but this kind of situations is exactly what keeps driving off Wikipedia users, we all (content creators) get so frustrated with drama-whores. It's shitty, really shitty. I don't mind if I get blocked, it's better to stay well away. I can still write elsewhere. Diego Grez-Cañete (talk) 01:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Vrac (talk) 02:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Savvyjack23 (talk) 08:04, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey... Those from Uraba are Urabaenses. Please research, after do undo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.131.97.7 (talk) 15:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the research, and the name Los Urabeños takes its name from Urabá. Whether the residents of Urabá prefer another name for themselves is a separate question that is irrelevant to this Wikipedia article. The article is about the criminal organization, not Urabá. Vrac (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]