Hi VikiIraq! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:31, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anti-Kurdish sentiment has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anti-Kurdish sentiment was changed by VikiIraq (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951786 on 2015-11-13T22:37:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Al-Zoro may be offensive or unwelcome. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. Crboyer (talk) 01:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing now! I cleaned up a number of your last edits which vary between unhelpful, nonsense and bordering to vandalism. If you stop now, then I will try to go through the rest of your recent edits. If you continue, then I unfortunately have to report you to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Regards, PanchoS (talk) 08:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I had to revert almost every single of your edits since you registered in May. Your disruptive editing went unnoticed for quite a while, but at a certain point someone will always notice it. I didn't report you to give you a second chance. If you start playing by the rules, then your contributions might be welcome. If you continue like this, then you will soon be blocked for quite some time. Şev baş, PanchoS (talk) 10:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making nonsensical page moves, or you may find yourself blocked from editing. I had to do quite a bit of cleanup / deletion of your edits. —Kusma (t·c) 10:41, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kurdish terror, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PanchoS (talk) 09:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]