Hello, Uncleangelo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jokestress (talk) 22:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greatest Hits: 1965–1992, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GLF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cher albums discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:26, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jake Shears, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Closer to the Truth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not update chart positions until confirmed/published by its source, Billboard. Per WP:RS, Twitter is not considered a reliable source, nor are message boards or forum posts. Billboard normally gives a "Chart Highlights" column on Mondays, which will preview select upcoming charts. Please wait til then, thanks - eo (talk) 19:42, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will not undid your version,but I think that if you dislike de Videography page,you should improve it.--88marcus (talk) 01:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will try. There are way too many info there, and many are not referenced that's why I included the official video albums on the main albums page. If you want you can check other artists' pages and most albums discographies included video releases. --Uncleangelo (talk) 17:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i own gold and live in the us and can vouch the album is an official release and was released by geffen records as the back of the cd says it is copyright 2005 geffen records so that means the album gold is an official release. if it isnt then Greatest Hits: 1965–1992, If I Could Turn Back Time: Cher's Greatest Hits, should not be on there either as they are released by geffen records too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.58.24.163 (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but how did Geffen get the rights to release songs Cher recorded for WB? Geffen had a contract with Cher to release a compilation after they have split, and that was Greatest Hits: 1965–1992 in Europe and If I Could Turn Back Time: Cher's Greatest Hits in US. Imo that is not an official release as the official one happened 2 years before, in 2003... I will check more on this...--Uncleangelo (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i have no clue how they got the rights. but they released it. it looks as though the album contains all the songs from The Very Best of Cher plus eleven tracks, a remix of "heart of stone", which was featured on If I Could Turn Back Time: Cher's Greatest Hits, instead of it being the original version, and "take me home" is extended. but other then that it contains the same songs on The Very Best of Cher, so idk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.58.24.163 (talk) 13:47, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Heart of Stone (Cher album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• /> Her nineteenth studio album, it was the first in her career to go top 10 in the United States (though she would go on to have four more, ''[[Believe (Cher album)|Believe]]'', ''[[Living Proof (

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I Hope You Find It, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:58, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Half-Breed (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The New Normal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aretha Franklin Sings the Great Diva Classics may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {| class="wikitable sortable plainrowheaders"
• !scope="row"|[[UK Albums Chart]]<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.officialcharts.com/archive-chart/_/3/2014-11-01/ |title=2012 Top 40

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:29, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be in a slow moving edit war on Believe (Cher album). Keep yourself aware, and I believe page protection has already been requested. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 18:36, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dusti, that's right, the unregistered user is making the edit over and over again. what is the way to ask for the page protection or to block certain ip addresses. thanks!Uncleangelo (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you have marked some of your edits as minor, even if they add significant amounts of information into the article. Minor edits are only edits that: fix spelling, or change wording. They are not major additions of content. Please keep this in mind next time you make a major edit. -- Orduin ^⋠T⋡ 00:51, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Got You Babe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock and Pop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cher Bang Bang.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:46, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sonny and Cher -A Cowboy's Work Is Never Done.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sonny and Cher All I Ever Need is you.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sonny and Cher Baby Don't Go.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sonny and Cher Little man.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for these notifications, I will try and add what's needed though I don't really have the experience with the images on wiki, hence why it happened.Uncleangelo (talk) 17:43, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cher feat. Beavis and Butthead.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:33, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Please don't mark your edit as minor when you add a brand new message to a talk page. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 12:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have removed the US cash box 100 chart because Billboard is the main and most important chart and I thought it would be misleading for the readers - so many US charts. As it goes for the "Believe" 2013 charts: 1. Scottisch chart is already there: she peaked at #1 when the single was released. Do you want to add every year to the table when the single re-entered the chart? Is it notable that she re-enetered at #91 in Scotland? To avoid long tables, there is info in the table "Chart (1998–99)", because Believe peaked on the charts not only in 1998. But I think we shouldn't change it to 1998–2013 either, in this case.

By the way, I'm not sure if you know this, but "Believe" also re-entered the UK Official Singles Chart these three times: 18/08/2012: 195 (1 wk), 06/10/2012: 125 (1 wk) and 26/10/2013: 128 (1 wk).

The UK Dance Chart is official, but wasn't there in 1998 - so what does this peak at #18 in 2013 say? In 1998 - she would've been #1. The same goes for the Dance/Electronic Digital Songs chart in the US. These are the reasons, why I have removed them last year :) Out of all these charts, I have added today the "Believe" 2013 UK Dance Chart and Dance/Electronic Digital Songs. :) --Max24 (talk) 12:54, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Many artists have the Cash Box 100 chart included as it was a popular magazine which indicated the song's popularity using slightly different criteria than Billboard. Also, I'm aware that Believe re-entered the UK top 200 chart several times, and those kinds of entries shouldn't be used. However, I do feel that a top 100 placement, which is shown on the official website for both Britain and Scotland, should be kept. After all that is what the charts are about, I mean if it entered at #1 it would surely be added, but in my book a chart position is a chart position. thanks! Uncleangelo (talk) 17:43, 08 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Got You Babe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack and Jill (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Uncleangelo! I have replied to your comment on my talk page. Cheers, Lordelliott (talk) 13:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Cher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRMA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what to do about the certification table in Cher's Believe article. I tried a lot of things, and put a help on Cher's talk page, but nobody answer it. 20 million copies is exagerated even considering shipments. Information provide by the record company is not reliable.--88marcus (talk) 15:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Cher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Half Breed. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of awards and nominations received by Cher page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why is it only showing one certification on this e-mail? Cher has also received 5x Platinum for her album Believe. She could have also had other certifications in Denmark besides those two. What was your e-mail to IFPI Denmark if you don't mind?--Harout72 (talk) 16:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I asked them if she had any other certifications besides the ones for Believe and that was their reply, quite to the point :). Later, I asked for a PDF but they said they will not be providing info and that I should ask the label. Here's the video where they presented her the awards for both the album and the single, apparently the single is also certified according to the video, and the album is awarded 3xPlatinum here, but that was in early 1999 and it was re-certified later as reported by Billboard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svLEkFl2QeU User:Uncleangelo (User talk:Uncleangelo) 22:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I have a question that's unrelated to my question above, thanks BTW for clarifying the Denmark's certification. Remember this file you provided for Cher's New Zealand's certification? Do you have this book in your procession or it was somebody else's? The reason I'm asking is because I'm trying to get hold of New Zealand's earlier certification levels. And if you look at the 3rd page where it says "Column 4", immediately after it indicated the levels for singles, it states "For album figures see above". I'm trying to understand if the levels for albums were higher as it was the case for the singles. So I'd like to know if there is an additional page as it says "For album figures see above" which possibly shows the changes for album levels.--Harout72 (talk) 03:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I contacted someone who has the book through http://www.charts.org.nz He was kind enough to scan the pages for a few artists I asked but I remember I waited for a few months... I guess you can try and contact Dean Scapolo himself somehow, he had a blog with his email address I remember, I did a quick search now but couldn't find it... edit. found this email now scapolo.dean@clear.net.nz - not sure if it's still functional though.

Anyway, good luck, curious to know what you discover! User:Uncleangelo (User talk:Uncleangelo) 23:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you have proof that Doris Dragović in late 1999 covered the song strong enough on Croatian language? I would likely to see that. I have search everywhere, but can not find.--Rkjon (talk) 21:25, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cher Bang Bang.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greatest Hits: 1965–1992, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRMA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Here We Go Again Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aukland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chart (2018)	Peak position
Australian Digital Tracks (ARIA)[1]	40
Belgium (Ultratip Bubbling Under Flanders)[2]	37
Finland Digital Song Sales[3]	7
French Downloads (SNEP)[4]	76
Hungary (Single Top 40)[5]	37
Scotland (OCC)[6]	26
Spain Radio Singles (PROMUSICAE)[7]	31
Spain Physical/Digital Singles (PROMUSICAE)[8]	46
Sweden Digital Song Sales[9]	8
UK Singles Sales (Official Charts Company)[10]	34
US Dance Club Songs (Billboard)[11]	4

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Here We Go Again Tour. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Braxton C. Womack^{talk to me!} 02:41, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Greatest Hits (Cher album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Cher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page O2 Arena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Cher singles discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Longhair\^talk 04:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Regarding this revert and this revert You claim the source is official. Can you prove that it is official? Please note that the burden of proof is on you as the one reintroducing the material. Current consensus is that this is a self-published list which has no official standing but we might be all wrong. --Muhandes (talk) 12:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't take this as going against WP:BRD, but there is consensus and support for removal of this source (I removed it from about hundred articles), so I undid your reverts. If you still think that consensus is wrong and you have proof that this source is official, feel free to re-revert and discuss the subject here. Of course, reverting without discussion will be considered edit-warring. Best regards. --Muhandes (talk) 06:27, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the Reshet Gimel and Galgalatz charts are single network charts, and incorporate user voting, so they should not be added, see WP:BADCHARTS. --Muhandes (talk) 14:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Below are the singles that were listed as promotional singles that have been moved to the main singles section. These singles were released as commercial 45s, sent to radio, and reviewed by Billboard, Cashbox, and/or Record World magazines. They were legitimate singles which failed to chart. A failure to chart does not downgrade a single to "promotional" status. These singles were reviewed by these publications as showing "chart potential", further indicating that they were indeed singles. Please review the sources below before reverting any changes that you personally disagree with. The constant reverting of this page is verging on edit-warring, or at the very least disruptive editing. As it states in this section of that page, if the added or changed information is sourced it should not be reverted simply because you personally disagree with what has been added.

"The First Time"

• Billboard, page 92: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Billboard/60s/1969/BB-1969-11-29.pdf
• Record World, page 8: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Record-World/60s/69/RW-1969-11-15.pdf

"Superstar"

• Billboard, page 62: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Billboard/70s/1970/Billboard%201970-11-07.pdf
• Cashbox, page 22: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Cash-Box/70s/1970/CB-1970-11-07.pdf
• Record World, page 8: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Record-World/70s/70/RW-1970-11-07.pdf

"Classified 1A"

• Billboard, page 58: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Billboard/70s/1971/Billboard%201971-04-10.pdf
• Record World, page 12: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Record-World/70s/71/RW-1971-04-10.pdf

"Don’t Put It on Me"

• 45cat, showing commercial and radio 45s: https://www.45cat.com/record/mu1137

"Will You Love Me Tomorrow"

• Billboard, page 52: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Billboard/70s/1971/Billboard%201971-12-04.pdf
• Record World, page 10: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Record-World/70s/71/RW-1971-12-04.pdf

"(Just Enough to Keep Me) Hangin’ On"

• Billboard, page 51: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Billboard/70s/1971/BB-1971-12-25.pdf
• Cashbox, page 10: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Cash-Box/70s/1972/Cash-Box-1972-01-01.pdf

"Carousel Man"

• Billboard, page 58: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Billboard/70s/1974/Billboard%201974-10-19.pdf
• Cashbox, page 23: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Cash-Box/70s/1974/CB-1974-10-19.pdf
• Record World, page 1: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Record-World/70s/74/RW-1974-10-19.pdf

"A Woman’s Story"

• Billboard, page 76: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Billboard/70s/1974/Billboard%201974-11-23.pdf
• Cashbox, page 22: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Cash-Box/70s/1974/CB-1974-11-30.pdf
• Record World, page 10: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Record-World/70s/74/RW-1974-11-30.pdf

"A Love Like Yours"

• Cashbox, page 14: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Cash-Box/70s/1975/CB-1975-02-08.pdf
• Record World, page 14: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Record-World/70s/75/RW-1975-02-08.pdf

"Holdin’ Out for Love"

• Cashbox, page 24: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Cash-Box/70s/1979/CB-1979-11-24.pdf
• Record World, page 1: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Record-World/70s/79/RW-1979-11-24.pdf

"Rudy"

• Billboard, page 70: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Billboard/80s/1982/BB-1982-05-22.pdf

"Main Man"

• Billboard, page 65: https://worldradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-Business/Music/Billboard-Index/IDX/1988/1988-soul-Billboard-Page-0159.pdf
• Cashbox, page 12: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Cash-Box/80s/1988/CB-1988-09-17.pdf

"Bang Bang"

• 45cat, showing commercially released 45 single: https://www.45cat.com/record/9278747

"The Star Spangled Banner"

• Billboard, page 17: https://worldradiohistory.com/Archive-All-Music/Billboard/90s/1999/BB-1999-07-10.pdf

"One of Us"

• Billboard, referred to as “third and final single”: https://www.billboard.com/culture/pride/cher-one-of-us-abba-8476305/

"Happiness Is Just a Thing Called Joe"

• Billboard, referred to as Cher’s new single: https://www.billboard.com/music/music-news/cher-happiness-is-just-a-thing-called-joe-at-biden-benefit-concert-9472662/

Benjichilders (talk) 19:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not mark additions of whole charts as minor edits, as you did here. See Help:Minor edit for what minor edits are—it's a change of either no or only a few bytes, like fixing a typo. Thanks. Ss112 11:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make unexplained reverts as you did here. If you wanted to restore what the user prior to me removed, you could have just copied the footnote templates they removed and readded them. You should not have reverted my edits, which are in line with MOS:SMALL (8pt is too small for text on Wikipedia), and subtitles of albums should not be made small so it can fit more "neatly" inside a column or whatever it was there for. N/a is not needed as Template:Non-album single and Template:Non-album singles now exist, and the pipe to capitalise the "i" in "in" of I'd Rather Believe in You should have been removed per MOS:CT and the article's location a long time ago. Thank you, and I trust you won't intentionally or otherwise helpful edits again. Ss112 19:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you update chart peaks, please update the access-date [1]. Ss112 07:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please remember to update access-dates? It's really not difficult to update the attached date in the album chart template or the single chart template. It is important as it tells editors you accessed that source again to verify that it still works on that date. Thank you. Ss112 23:58, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Christmas (Cher album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 18:06, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cher singles discography, you may be blocked from editing. Uncleangelo, if you continue to add unsourced chart positions, I will report you to an administrator. Ss112 00:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Cher singles discography. Last warning before I inform an administrator you habitually add unsourced chart information. CHECK the sources. Ss112 22:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What are you referring to? There was a source added with the latest edit I did. Either way, obviously I'm not that proficient at editing, as I'm just a fan who wants to add the latest and accurate info, if there are those who are more technically skilled as you are just kindly note what could be done better. thank you. Uncleangelo (talk) 03:57, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you happen to know a source that has the money gross and attendance numbers for the last 3 shows of Cher’s Here We Go Again Tour? Cherfan 15!! (talk) 01:11, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]