Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

Wishing you joy & happiness during this festive season. Happy Bada Dashain! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 06:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tulsi,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Tulsi Bhagat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Online Khabar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:21, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tulsi,

Since the previous removal of your global rollback rights involved your English Wikipedia activity, I felt the need to notify English Wikipedia people as well. The notification was made via WP:AN.

Thank you for your understanding, Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tulsi,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello Tulsi Bhagat Would you like to write about Isabelle de Charrière (123386) for the Nepal Wikipedia? That would be appreciated. Boss-well63 (talk) 16:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Boss-well63! Sorry, I am a bit busy these days. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat ^{[ contribs | talk ]} 02:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Tulsi Bhagat maybe when you have time after all that. Dont is hurry. Boss-well63 (talk) 11:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Pranam Mithila. Tulsi Bhagat is one of the social activists from Mithila Nepal. Sitaramradheshyam (talk) 10:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tulsi Bhagat: मुझे मैथिली भाषा नहीं आती। कृपया निम्नलिखित का अनुवाद कर दीजिए

असंख्य मुर्दा लनवरत अनगिनत फेर अलका नूपुर । कत्थक नृत्य । तखन महाकाली आ हुनक सखसहेनी सभ नरमुंडक माला गंथने - खप्परमे खून चुअबैत ।

117.234.15.134 (वार्ता) 03:35, 8 अप्रैल 2022 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Balen Shah instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Balen Shah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Balen Shah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tulsi Bhagat! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tulsi

Thank you for creating Kiran Kumari Rae.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

According to the references the surname is spelled Rai, or is this a translation issue? Regards

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hughesdarren: I think it's an alternative. Sometimes it is written as Rae, Ray or Rai, people choices you know. I've created it as per the Wikidata item, Kiran Kumari Rae (Q67915184). Kind regards, — Tulsi 24x7 09:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough at least the wikis will be consistent. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:00, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Upendra Mahato (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:14, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tulsi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Halalguy, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 12:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shirt58: The user has no significant edit on Wikipedia and their userpage has a promotional link to Biography Radar. Also, Userpage has information related nothing to Wikipedia, so Could you please advice how it is 'Not a blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost'? Kind regards, — Tulsi 24x7 12:29, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ROPE, WP:BITE and de minimis non curat lex would all appear to apply here. Peter in Australia aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:56, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shirt58: WP:ROPE is an essay on the blocking policy (I have not requested any block). WP:BITE is mainly concerned about edits on mainspace and not userspace. No comment for de minimis non curat lex because Its neither a policy nor an essay. I believe all three you pointed doesn't appear to apply here. All what apply is WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:U5. With this, I feel it should be deleted instead. Thank you for your understanding. — Tulsi 24x7 11:42, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Babita Kumari (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tulsi, I noticed that my article was put into draft space. I admit I am a newer editor and would like you to tell me how I can improve the article JayBirdtyper (talk) 14:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JayBirdtyper: Please see your talk page message. Study the links mentioned on it. Kind regards, — Tulsi 24x7 14:27, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tulsi, try using the Election box templates, in articles like Gulab Jung Shah. It makes editing easier. For an example, see Hatpipliya Assembly constituency#2018 Vidhan Sabha -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Routine of Nepal banda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Routine of Nepal banda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DIVINE (talk) 13:07, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We commonly see news on Communist Party of Nepal (Unity National Campaign) of Bam Dev Gautam. This article is not available on Wikipedia. You are on article creation campaign. This party is currently in light! So can you please make an article on it? I hope to get positive response very soon. Thanks!2404:7C00:43:C621:9C6C:5D36:EC45:18C (talk) 07:19, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I will take a look and make it, a bit later when I am feel like doing it. Kind regards, — Tulsi 24x7 08:17, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anil Keshary Shah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anil Keshary Shah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I sent a request to change my name, I'd like if you could accept it E.S. Cohen - א.ס. כהן (talk) 12:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@א.ס. כהן: Hi, I am not a Global renamer and has no access to rename tools. Wait for a while someone may handle it shortly. — Tulsi 24x7 12:26, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsi can you tell me someone who's a global renamer and they're online? E.S Cohen - א.ס. כהן (talk) 12:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@א.ס. כהן: See m:Global renamers#Users with global rename access. Kind regards, — Tulsi 24x7 06:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the article I created, should not have had a speedy delete. Can you please tell me what steps I have to take. I apologize if messaging you isn't the best course of action, but I messaged another administrator, and I think that wasn't the right person to contact. Please help. Bronoton (talk) 01:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bronoton: Please check out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tami-Adrian George and go through WP:AFC, submit your drafted article for review. If needed any help, go for Teahouse. Kind regards, — Tulsi 24x7 06:42, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like the content I created sent to me, or to my sandbox please. Because I went through extensive edits on that article. Then I will do the afc. Bronoton (talk) 19:42, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bronoton: I am not an admin so I have no access to do that. Please ask the admin who deleted it upon request. — Tulsi 24x7 03:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	You have did a Excellent work for Wikipedia. Sayeed2k (talk) 05:08, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Rastriya Swatantra Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rastriya Swatantra Party. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you take a look at or report the page 56 to ple (talk · contribs) and the IP 2400:1A00:BD20:4866:15DD:DDC6:AEBF:E3E3 (talk · contribs). The new account is editing pages related to Province 1. Their edits seem to be similar in nature to edits made by Anup Rajbanshi (talk · contribs). Also they are trying to bypass the cool-down period of creating new articles by new users by moving unrelated pages in order to create new pages. The user may also be Lexington Will (talk · contribs) who was banned for similar reasons. Thank you. PenGear (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also this IP 2400:1A00:BD20:4866:6051:5AC7:8F91:A5C0 (talk · contribs) PenGear (talk) 18:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ghero and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 12:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fade258: Would you care to explain what sort of references (included in the draft) you find not in-depth, unreliable, not secondary and not independent of the subject? Kantipur, Nagarik News, Himal Khabar or RASTRIYA SAMACHAR SAMITI are not reliable? Tulsi 24x7 14:46, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tulsi, First of all, that was an automated message of declined reason which I choose while declining this draft. Mentioned references are reliable and independent to the subject and have significant coverage but coverage is not much sufficient. It would be better to add more references and then re-submit it, where possibility of accepting this draft would be better. May be I will review this draft again. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 15:38, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fade258: Thank you for your response. I couldn't understand you, "...have significant coverage but coverage is not much sufficient". I have added 10 references, each sentence is verifiable by the cited reliable sources. Generally, three references are required for the draft to be moved to mainspace. It has more than three. Could you please let me know what else are you looking for? How can I improve it? Kind regards, Tulsi 24x7 02:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tulsi:, I've re-checked the mentioned references and found good ref. i.e Kantipur, Online khabar, Himal khabar, Nagarik news, Nepal Live etc, these all are reliable and independent but I found that ekagaj is not quite reliable as I think that this news portal has been running by two or more people and editorial content is not much good. It's all good now and you can re-submit this draft. Thank you! Fade258 (talk) 05:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fade258: You said, it has good references then what is the point of declining the draft? Tulsi 24x7 07:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Except Kantipur, Nagarik, and Online khabar, other references have quite significant coverage and ekgaj news is not much reliable. So, I have declined this draft but next time this draft will be accepted and sorry for my missunderstanding it. Thank you ! Fade258 (talk) 07:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ghero, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fade258 (talk) 02:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for creating Ghero. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 09:50, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is DIVINE and Tulsi: COI/UPE/quid-pro-quo editing, association with threats and harassment. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 03:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Babita Kumari (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tulsi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Respected admins, I understand my behaviors were problematic and deceptive. I apologies for those. On 3rd of April 2024, Rosguill blocked my account for the concern undisclosed paid editing with relate to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive361 § DIVINE and Tulsi: COI/UPE/quid-pro-quo editing, association with threats and harassment, but in fact I have no serious involvement in it except for a bit of minor past interactions. Honestly, I have never written any article for payments. I don't support paid editing. The issue which I am accused of was back in 2020 or 2021 and before. For which, I admitted and disclosed the COI with live articles on their respective talk pages. Discussions took place and my globally & locally associated rights were removed, but the block was not placed at that time. Most of the articles were deleted and buried so I didn't find it useful to disclose anything anywhere. I don't prefer to create or edit on any COI article now and in future. However, if someone forces me to create an article then I definitely do a disclosure on article talk page and which go through a review. See a decent example I did on Talk:Ghero. I respect Rosguill's decision to block my account after 2 years of the incident which is still relevant. However, I understand a block is not a punishment, but a way to prevent further disruption. Since the past incidents, I am evolved by the time and lessons learned as well. Reviewing my last 2 years of contributions here, you could find I have created over 80 articles. There are no issues of any undisclosed (paid editing/COI). Apart from creating articles, I had a time in patrolling, see Twinkle log, Draftify log and had reported several usernames at WP:UAA for violation. I am into this hard time because I was not much into reading policies back then. To a great extent to acknowledgment about the policies, the issue is not persistent. I am a globally established user active since Oct. 2014. I have been active on other several projects contributed tirelessly supporting the vision of free access to the sum of all human knowledge. Till date, I have been entrusted with serving as a sysop on Wikimedia Commons, Meta-Wiki, MediaWiki, Maithili and Nepali Wikipedia. What motivates me for placing an unblock request today is that I came across vandalism/unconstructive edits on the article Balen Shah. The unconstructive edits exist since 27 May 2024 and I couldn't revert it. I pledge to contributing abide by the established policies. I would be glad to answer the questions you may have. Sincerely, I humbly urge to request for an unblock here on English Wikipedia. Kind regards, Tulsi 24x7 13:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:22, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: It seems rather non-optimal to procedurally decline this as stale, given that it was a fairly high-profile block. The default text filled in by {{decline stale}} implies that the unblock request was incomplete, and while some admins might certainly see cause to doubt validity of the request (I'll leave that judgement call to others), one thing it wasn't was incomplete. A response on the merits, even if it leads to the same result, would be preferable procedurally. Cp blocking admin Rosguill. Sdkb ^talk 16:24, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but nobody reviewed the unblock request. If you'd like to review it on the merits yourself, I believe you are free to do so; I certainly wouldn't object to you reinstating the request and then immediately reviewing it yourself. There were well over a hundred open unblock requests, many of which had been languishing for months. --Yamla (talk) 16:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Huh, what do you mean by nobody reviewed the unblock request? You didn't care to review it, and just declined it for sake of closing the request? Thank you for your poor judgement. This is definitely NOT what I could have expected from an admin. Tulsi 24x7 08:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Followed up on the broader issue here. Sdkb ^talk 17:39, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]