Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 04:35, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Counterculture Hall of Fame inductees ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 22:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:How people got fire tish.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:06, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was a promotional still from the website for the film. They are used all over this site. Is the Non-free film screenshot tag correct? Trilliumz (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trilliumz. You have new messages at Acather96's talk page.
Message added 19:19, 5 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, Trilliumz. You have new messages at Acather96's talk page.
Message added 19:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I've restored this per your request at WP:REFUND. I will give you 24 hours to provide a valid fair-use rationale. The reason it was deleted was because there was no rationale explaining why its use was permitted under WP:NFCC (CSD F6), so I'm giving you 24 hours to add one. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:52, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Earl Best article is nicely done and would be an excellent candidate for DYK. Can I remind you that when adding entries to articles like List of Newark, New Jersey people as in this edit that you include appropriate sources in the list, ideally ones already included in the original article. Again, nicely done on the article about Best. Alansohn (talk) 03:44, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for encouragement and adding the cite. Wouldn't have tried for a DYK otherwise! Trilliumz (talk) 16:34, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With all of the negative press that Newark so regularly receives, Best is an example of someone who could have easily fallen back into the world he had left, but instead chose to follow a far more positive and constructive path. His is a wonderful story that other should know about, and DYK is an excellent venue. My only general suggestion is that it looks like there needs to be an article about street ministry to correspond to the category and to better explain the practice. Keep it up! Alansohn (talk) 16:42, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Earl Best at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 18:29, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trilliumz. I'd like to apologize for accidentally removing {{Template talk:Did you know/Earl Best}} from T:TDYK by mistake. I have just restored it to T:TDYK. The nomination should get evaluated with the rest of the noms on T:TDYK and moved to queue as usual. Sorry for the inconvenience and delay caused. Hope this helps. --PFHLai (talk) 03:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trilliumz, greetings from Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv, on my way to Wikimania in Haifa. I spent about an hour yesterday and figured out that the entry had accidentally been removed from the queue. I agree with you that one source per paragraph is enough in most cases, but for DYK the standards are raised and the insistence is that there be a source to support every statement in the hook. I made those changes and the article is being reviewed. I will keep an eye on it, but I think that it will go smoothly from here. I hope this helps, but let me know if you need any more assistance. Keep up the great work! Alansohn (talk) 14:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)D[reply]

I have reviewed the article and have a small comment. Could you see T:TDYK and reply there? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can't find your comment or the article. This is awfully confusing. Could some of you more experienced people help fix whatever needs to be fixed here? Trilliumz (talk) 12:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, your nomination is here. My comments (I've commented again) are there. Don't worry though, Alansohn fixed the problems I identified and I have approved the article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:41, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Crisco 1492 for the approval, which must have come moments after I edited the article, and to all those who helped resolve this issue. Trilliumz, this is a new article that should represent Wikipedia well on the front page and I hope that you will create more. Please feel free to contact me if I can help with any DYK-eligible articles or any other issue, and my hope is that you will soon be comfortable nominating articles for DYK and becoming familiar with the sourcing requirements there. Congratulations! Alansohn (talk) 12:46, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for help, and one more thing: it's sitting in Category:Passed DYK nominations from July 2001 instead of July 2011. Does this need to be fixed to proceed? Trilliumz (talk) 22:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trilliumz. I feel bad that you have to wait so long to see your DYK article get on MainPage, but please see Wikipedia talk:Did you know#Earl Best. Feel free to chime in. Hope this helps. --PFHLai (talk) 03:36, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trilliumz. Pls note that the "Street Doctor" is now on DYKQ6 and scheduled to appear on MainPage at midnight tonight (UTC). Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 13:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Trilliumz, thanks for trying to rescue Gecko Gear, unfortunately, I have removed much of your work. This is because I would like the AfD to decide on the notability of the Australian company alone, and introducing info on the other companies may confuse the !voters at the AfD as to what the article is about. If you still think that the removed content is useful, we can have a discussion about that on Talk:Gecko Gear. Quasihuman | Talk 10:38, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Plain Green Loans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Harry the Dog WOOF 16:05, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Free public outdoor meals, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 18:48, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trilliumz/Sandbox1 to User:Trilliumz/Sandbox1. Next will come the nasty-lookin' CSD notice. Ouch! --Shirt58 (talk) 03:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trilliumz. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 04:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi Trilliumz. I've just started the Nellie Stone Johnson article and saw that you did some work in your sandbox. I'll go ahead and include your infobox and references if you don't mind. Also if you'd like to help improve the article that would be most welcome. Thanks, Gobōnobo ^{+ c} 21:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great, I was hoping to find someone to run with this. Would make a DYK if you have time for a self-nom. Trilliumz (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thanks for publishing the new articles California State Relief Administration, Drought Relief Service and others. Thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia's coverage of historical topics. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:00, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Subsistence Homesteads Division, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from From given sources. While quote marks are used, if all of the quoted material was removed from the article, there would really only be random words left for most of the sections., and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Subsistence Homesteads Division and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Subsistence Homesteads Division, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Subsistence Homesteads Division with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Subsistence Homesteads Division. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at . Leave a note at Talk:Subsistence Homesteads Division saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Dana boomer (talk) 20:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. Ottawahitech (talk) 04:01, 29 July 2016 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miranda Gibson, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miranda Gibson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]