Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 300 (number) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dhrm77 (talk) 11:41, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 100 (number). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dhrm77 (talk) 11:42, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dhrm77. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 300 (number) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. unexplained removal of Table Of Content limitation. Dhrm77 (talk) 04:12, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 400 (number). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Unexplained removal of Table Of Content limitation. Dhrm77 (talk) 04:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit war. See WP:BRD; if you wish to change the references format, discuss this on the article talk page. Clean Copy^talk 11:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I noticed that in this edit to Mars, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 09:28, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to United States, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. bojo1498 talk 14:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Military intervention against ISIL, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 06:59, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Syrian civil war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 09:29, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Template:Syrian Civil War infobox. Jim1138 (talk) 08:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at template:Syrian Civil War infobox, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Editor abcdef (talk) 09:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Syrian civil war, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. bojo1498 talk 14:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Military intervention against ISIL, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. SaintAviator lets talk 09:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Syrian civil war, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. GAB^gab 15:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

--NeilN ^{talk to me} 11:27, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:38, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Copa América Centenario broadcasting rights is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copa América Centenario broadcasting rights until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 07:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]