Welcome!

Hello, Toci, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! BalkanFever 03:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vo pravo si - mnogu interesno ke bide literaturno spored dijalekticki. Za zal, jas ne znam mnogu za sboruvi sto se razlicni megju dijalekti, jas pisuvam i zboruvam vo literaturniot jazik povekjeto vreme. Na toj nacin, i isto taka bidejki mojot leksikon ne e najgolem, nemam idei za pridonesuvanje na vikirecnikot. Korisnici koi mozat da pridonesuvaat izgleda se naogjat na makedonskata vikipedija. Pozdrav.

P.S. Ako nekogas imas vreme da pridonesuvas tuka vo angliski, pogledni kaj WP:MKD. BalkanFever 12:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bravos! Mnogu dobra statija ispadna. BalkanFever 04:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ti prativ email za toa. Isto taka, poveli ovde da glasiš za brišanje. Pozdrav BalkanFever 03:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am very rarely on wikipedia lately, i don't think the project is going into the right direction, and is too easy to put in POV, and way too hard to get objective articles (whatever objective means), but good work on the Macedonian articles, say hi to my dear bulgarian and greek friends which I see you've met :)

pozdrav Capricornis (talk) 22:35, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:MakedonskGlasNo9 Page2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you may be interested in, Macedonian language naming dispute, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Macedonian language naming dispute. Thank you.Alex Makedon (talk) 09:27, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not undertake any moves without consensus. Discuss prior to making a move and unless you have the approval of other people, do not proceed. There's no point in move wars, especially such over a single letter. Todor→Bozhinov 17:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I beg you pardon? "Inappropriate"? "Aggressiveness?" "War threats"? And this is all referring to my advice just above, that you duly followed by initiating a discussion?

On to the topic. Google hits, otherwise a good reference point, cannot be used here because there are Macedonian sports teams and a municipality of Skopje which bear the name, and so this query is dominant. Naturally, Google redirects searches to the dominant query. Seriously, what's this thing about making such a fuss over a single letter?

And honestly, I expected more than "the Bulgarian spelling of Gyorche Petrov's name should not be used because Bulgarians don't care about him and because he hated Bulgaria". This is so factually wrong and naive that I consider this dispute over. Todor→Bozhinov 20:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jingiby. I noticed that you add tags POV to the articles Gemidzii and Pavel Shatev. Your edits appear to be nonconstructive and have been reverted. Please, do not introduce redundant and/or spam taqs into this articles. Discuss your ideas at first on article's talk-page and describe then your suggestions. Afterwards wait for several days and if there is neither discussion nor reliable changes then add proposed by you tags. Dispute templates are used to alert other editors that work is needed on a certain article. They should normally not be used without a clear description from the applying editor of the rationale, preferably presented in a numbered list form on the article's talk page, in a section which includes the name of the template that was applied. As these items are dealt with, it is suggested each line be struck through. Some guidance should be given by the posting editor as to what action will resolve the matter when using section and article (page) tagging templates. Many editors consider use of any banner template in an article a serious measure of last resort, and would prefer other measures be exhausted before such detractions from the project be used. If one must be used, please make a thorough note listing deficiencies or items being disputed in bulleted or numbered paragraph format under a clear notice section heading on the article's talk page. If you believe the tags you added are correct, please cite references or sources before adding them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 10:02, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Toci, you obviously didn't read even the opinion of the best Macedonian expert of the IMRO-issue, the historian Academician Ivan Katardzhiev, who confirms that left-wing IMRO revolutionaries continued to identify themselves de facto as Bulgarians even in Communist Yugoslavia:

ФОРУМ: Неодамна, во едно интервју, висока функционерка на ВМРО-ДПМНЕ, зборувајќи за тезата дека левицата во Македонија секогаш била ориентирана кон Белград, а десницата кон Софија, ми го посочи примерот на Димитар Влахов - левичар од ВМРО (Обединета), кој се декларирал како Бугарин.

КАТАРЏИЕВ: Да, тоа е точно. И не само Димитар Влахов. Павел Шатев, Панко Брашнаров, Ризо Ризов и др. Меѓутоа, овде тезата е погрешно поставена. Не е работата во тоа дали левицата се определуваше за Србија, а десницата за Бугарија. Тука се мешаат поимите. Практично, ни левицата ни десницата не ја доведуваа во прашање својата бугарска провениенција. Тоа ќе го доведе дури и Димитар Влахов во 1948 година на седница на Политбирото, кога говореше за постоењето на македонска нација, да рече дека во 1931-32 година (then IMRO (United) issued for the first time the idea of separate Macedonian nation) е направена грешка.Сите тие ветерани останаа само на нивото на политички, а не и на национален сепаратизам... Така, во текот на НОБ, кога дојде времето за поврзување, постоеше огромен јаз во свеста на Македонецот од трите дела на земјата. Сите велеа дека се Македонци, ама сите на тој поим му даваа поинаква содржина. Кои доаѓаа од Бугарија, тие сметаа дека треба да дојдат на чело и да ја водат Македонија, особено ветераните како Шатев и Влахов. Тие, практично, се чувствуваа како Бугари. ВМРО (Об.) не мрдна од обичниот политички македонски сепаратизам. Jingiby (talk) 13:19, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gemidzii and Pavel Shatev. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jingiby (talk) 16:13, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:56, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not insert fringe or undue weight content into articles. An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Please use the article's talk page to discuss the material and its appropriate weight within the article. Thank you.Jingiby (talk) 07:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. :-) I have been on Wikipedia for more than 10 years. Nice to get all the medals for being fringe theorist. I am just presenting a Macedonian POV as many Bulgarian editors are giving their POV. The difference is that I try to clear the articles from Bulgarian or Macedonian attributes whenever it is possible. It is better to write that someone is poet, than Bulgarian poet in Republic of Bulgaria, but also considered Macedonian poet in Republic of Macedonia. Toci (talk) 07:26, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jingiby. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 08:01, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MakedonskGlasNo1 FrontPage.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]