Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tmiele assist/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tmiele assist! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

References need to be placed inline at the points in the text which they are intended to support. See WP:REFB for the relevant guidelines. External links should be removed from the content convert to Wikilinks or references where possible.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tmiele assist/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 17:19, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So I'm supposed to take all the external links and insert them in the article? There should not be a separate external link section? Tmiele assist (talk) 18:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tmiele assist. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Tara Miele, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tmiele assist. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tmiele assist|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 18:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a PR person or anything I'm just her personal assistant. She tried to create the page herself and kept getting declined because it's so difficult to navigate. She asked me to help, but it's not my job to make her a wikipedia page. Tmiele assist (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm merely looking into it for her Tmiele assist (talk) 18:54, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So are you paid by her or not? Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 18:55, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not to edit wikipedia. Tmiele assist (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But does this edit count as part of your job? Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 18:57, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, and I'm not doing the editing. I didn't create the page for her, I just started working for her but she's been trying for a while. Tmiele assist (talk) 18:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well then who is making the edits? Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:00, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tara Tmiele assist (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you are sharing an account? Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She gave me her log in information Tmiele assist (talk) 19:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On this account or another? as what you are describing is a violation of the WP:SHAREDACCOUNT policy. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:04, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sir, just tell me what to do. Tmiele assist (talk) 19:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is stated above in the long message. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:06, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was just seeking an answer to the simple question of how long the review process will take to report back to Tara and I've been attacked by your customer service. Thank you Tmiele assist (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@I dream of horses, could you please help me with this, as I have no other way to explain it. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:12, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tmiele assist Being told to do things differently is not a personal attack. (@Zippybonzo) I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 19:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did what you asked. Tmiele assist (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The answer to that is anywhere between 1 week and 10 years, because they are not reviewed in any particular order. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:13, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for password sharing. Sharing an account is not permitted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:17, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is Tara now, the person who owns the account. My executive assistant has all my passwords to all my accounts, didn't know that was against the rules. I will no longer let her log on to wikipedia. Sorry for the mix up. May I please be unblocked so I can edit my page? Tmiele assist (talk) 19:24, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The instructions to appeal the block are included in the block message above; another admin will review the appeal if you make one. Compromised accounts are very rarely unblocked because we have no idea who is behind the keyboard making the appeal. In addition, this account has been used solely for self-promotion, so that issues would need to be addressed as well.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to change my password? Would that help? Tmiele assist (talk) 19:38, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that would help, you can do so in Special:Preferences Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:41, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok done, thank you Tmiele assist (talk) 19:58, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo, courtesy ping for you. Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:25, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Try making an unblock request using {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where do I put in this request? Thank you Tmiele assist (talk) 20:01, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind! I think I figured it out. Tmiele assist (talk) 20:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zippybonzo was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The bottom paragraph is almost entirely promotional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tara Miele and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zippybonzo | Talk (he|him) 19:20, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tmiele assist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't know that I wasn't allowed to give my executive assistant my wikipedia log in information. I have since changed the password and have not shared it with her. Tmiele assist (talk) 20:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to follow the guidance at WP:COMPROMISED to establish that you are back in exclusive control of your account. After that I'd suggest changing your username via Special:GlobalRenameRequest or WP:CHUS to remove "assist" from your username. If your assistant wants to edit, they will need to create an account for themselves(but they should not do so until this block is removed or they risk being blocked as a sock puppet of you). As noted above, you will also need to address your promotional edits about yourself. While it is not absolutely forbidden to make autobiographical contributions, it is highly discouraged; please read the autobiography policy as well as conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 07:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, Tmiele assist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tara Miele, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tmiele assist. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tara Miele".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]