Hello, Tmangray, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 01:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you feel it's absolutely necessary, please post your comments on the topic discussion pages rather than here. Thank you. Tmangray

I've seen your edits to articles related to the Bay Area, such as Berkeley, California, so I was wondering if you'd like to join WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area. It's a WikiProject that focuses on improving Wikipedia's coverage of the Bay Area. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the member list. Thanks for reading! — Emiellaiendiay 08:30, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tmangray, and welcome to WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles relevant to the Bay Area. Here are some points that may be helpful: Our main aim is to help improve Bay Area-related articles, so if people ask for help with an article, please try your hardest to help them if you are able. Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page. It is highly recommended that you watchlist it. The project has several ongoing and developing activities, such as article quality assessment, which you are welcome to participate. Our system for improving lower-quality articles is Jumpaclass. If you'll be editing stub, start, or B-class articles, consider using Jumpaclass to track your progress. If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to our translation section, to help us improve our foreign Bay Area topics. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We hope you enjoy working on this project.

P.S. Right now we're focusing on tagging everything Bay Area-related. You can pitch in by adding {{SFBAProject | class=}} to the top of talk pages of articles. Click here if you need more information on assessing articles. Thanks!

— Emiellaiendiay 19:36, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would really like to know the source that you used for the added sentence As the rifting is, in geologic terms, just getting underway, these two parts of the African Plate are generally regarded as protoplates rather than as full-fledged independent plates. inthis edit

Thank you,--Adi (talk) 06:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

K, in that case I'll just remove the whole sentence.--Adi (talk) 06:25, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Be my guest. The definition is rarely stated by geologists anyway. It was pointed out to me online that a full-fledged plate is one which includes oceanic crust emerging from a seafloor spreading rift at its growing edge. An incipient spreading center is one in which continental crust is being rifted antecedent to oceanic crust being formed. No particular citeable source near at hand for me to reference, but I expect someone else may eventually come up with one. Tmangray (talk) 20:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at Wikipedia:Notability (people) please. --Sting Buzz Me... 12:32, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I have. See discussion page at article to continue. Thanks. Tmangray (talk) 18:48, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated Georgia 300, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, 293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 23:18, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On January 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Georgia 300, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 11:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Were you thinking monsoon trough was a more generalized term (parent article) to ITCZ, or the other way around? Your comments on the monsoon trough talk page gave me the impression it was the other way around. Either way, some piece of literature must be found to indicate they are not one and the same. Their definitions through the glossary of meteorology seem different, but inherently explain the same feature. Definitely let me know if you ever run across a paper that separates the two terms. I've never run across one. Thegreatdr (talk) 15:47, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I've removed a bit about the Colorado River course and Monterey Canyon (see: Talk:Colorado River#Section removed for discussion. Seems it was sourced to an abstract of a master's thesis from 1982, and that doesn't really qualify as a reliable source. After a bit of looking at article history, I found that you added the material on 14 November 2007. The info is interesting, but I've not found a good source for it - so thought I'd ask if you perhaps know of more info about it. I see the same MS thesis used as a source on the Monterey Canyon article for similar content, so we need a WP:RS for that also. Thanks, Vsmith (talk) 03:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article ALICE (propellant) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. I dream of horses @ 17:19, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is premature as the article has only just been created. Tmangray (talk) 17:34, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tmangray. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I dream of horses @ 17:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tmangray. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--I dream of horses @ 17:40, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tmangray, would it be possible for you to improve the references section on the ALICE article? Of the three refs you've provided, two of them are news stories that don't back up all of the claims you've made in the article, and the third one, a PDF, only links to the first page of the paper. Is it possible to access the rest of the paper online? That would be very helpful. Also, to back up what Horses said, while I can agree she jumped the gun a little bit, you can avoid having such things happen in the future by having referenced statements on the article at the very time it goes live. -- Soap ^Talk/_{Contributions} 18:40, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen your early work on this article - I'm currently trying to get it to Featured Article status. Any comments on the ongoing Peer Review or tweaks to the article itself would be appreciated. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 21:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The link that justified the article is now dead - do you see reason why it should not be Prod'ed or Afd'd? If you wish to support it perhaps you could help find some valid refs somewhere SatuSuro 05:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well if I knew what Prod'ed or Afd'd meant, I might. Tmangray (talk) 00:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article UC Village has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable building

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 21:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You mention a map showing the connection between Ward & Derby. This is problematical because the SP operated a freight yard at Ward St. until 1950 or so. To access it the train had to go past Ward St. and then back into the yard, so it needed some track along Shattuck Ave. Demoro vol. I locates the crossover at Dwight Way. You mention a photo of the track connection. Does it appear in a publication?

MagnaGraecia (talk) 19:22, 30 May 2010 (UTC)MagnaGraecia[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 14:00, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Louise Noack Gray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for many years and I can't see anything of substance (that is not a Wiki mirror) online. Little claim to notability either, it suggests this is a tribute by a relative?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 11:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Berkeley Unified School District may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[University Students' Cooperative Association|Rochdale Apartments student housing cooperative]])

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Luther King Middle School (Berkeley) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Luther King Middle School (Berkeley) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:38, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on James J. Kenney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Zackmann08 (talk) 05:19, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James J. Kenney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James J. Kenney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (talk) 05:31, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tmangray, One of the requirements for a Newspapers.com account is that you have your Wikipedia Preferences enabled to receive email messages on English Wikipedia. I need to email you a very short signup form to fill out. Your email address (and no other information) will be passed on to Newspapers.com so they can activate your subscription. Thanks, HazelAB (talk) 22:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tmangray. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 22:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are still interested in getting a Newspapers.com account, please follow the instructions in the Wikipedia email that was sent to you on October 9. HazelAB (talk) 18:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Dry lightning —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Pierre cb (talk) 05:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre cb (talk) 05:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my note at Talk:Giant Powder Company. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to explain why I reverted your change of is to was in Blue Monday Jamboree.

When I began creating articles about old-time radio programs, I used was in the leads. At some point, however, I found some of the articles being corrected to present tense. When I questioned those changes, I was directed to the Tense section of Wikipedia's Manual of Style, which gives the example Earth: Final Conflict is a Canadian science fiction television series that ran for five seasons between October 6, 1997 and May 20, 2002.

If you want to change back to past tense, I won't interfere again, but I wanted you to know that I had a reason for reverting your change; it wasn't just a whim. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what your edit was meant to accomplish. The grammar was wrong, and Lillienfeld was not a German national, he was from Austria-Hungary - specifically, from the german ethnic subpopulation of A-H. Tarl N. (discuss) 05:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused about referring to Lilienfeld as "ethnic German" when he was an ethnic Jew. I thought the original wording was confusing nationality with ethnicity. Adding to the confusion is the sidebar reference which gives his nationality as "German", so I was attempting to make what I thought was a correction of the text to correspond with the sidebar. Tmangray (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Austria-Hungary was a mess of ethnicities. Generally, they were tagged by the language they spoke (German, Hungarian, Serbian, ...). Being tagged as both German and Jewish (which separately described language and religion) was not uncommon. Tarl N. (discuss) 01:01, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary comment. Digging out his biography, it mentions his father was "a Jewish lawyer", does not say that Lilienfeld was Jewish (and he might not have been, depending on whether his mother, Sarah Jamoler Lilienfeld, was). He was born in what is now Lviv, Ukraine. His own ethnicity isn't mentioned at all (at least in American National Biography), but his history from 1899 demonstrates his facility in German - Universities in Berlin and Leipzig. Unlikely destinations for Serbian, Romanian, Hungarian, ... Regards, Tarl N. (discuss) 01:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicity is not determined by language, although language can be a feature of a shared culture in a population that is primarily endogamous. Nationality is about citizenship. I see nothing about Lilienfeld's parentage to indicate that he was German at all. We do know that he was at least half Jewish in the ethnic sense, and he married a Jewish woman. He was born in the Jewish community of Ukraine. Whether he was a religiously observant Jew, I have no idea, but the information I see definitely connects him to the Jewish community by ancestry and marriage. It would be remarkable and probably mentioned specifically if his immediate ancestors/either parent were non-Jewish (ethnic sense) converts to Judaism (the religion). Tmangray (talk) 01:47, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas E. Caldecott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas E. Caldecott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 08:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm currently working on the page you started on Edgar Rickard. On 30 April 2007 you added a reference: Truman Library bio sketch

The URL was http://www.trumanlibrary.org/hoover/rickard.htm

As best I can tell the link is dead, the search function on trumanlibrary.gov for Rickard gives no results, and the URL is not in the webarchive.

Do you have any suggestions as to where the text of this reference might be found on the web?

Thanks, Tango Mike Bravo (talk) 12:21, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the intrusion, I looked again in the web archive and found http://web.archive.org/web/20070519122416/https://www.trumanlibrary.org/hoover/rickard.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tango Mike Bravo (talk • contribs) 12:33, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Surface weather analysis for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Noah^Talk 22:45, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wildcat Canyon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGEO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tooncool64 (talk) 01:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]