Welcome! to my talk page

Hello, I am Tinpisa. Thankyou for visiting my talk page. Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, welcome! --Tinpisa (talk) 15:35, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Kuldip Nayar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indian and The Daily Star (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kingfisher Calendar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Archaios (talk) 17:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for the (inaccurate) CSD nom. Archaios (talk) 18:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No issues, Archaios! Tinpisa (talk) 20:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good job creating this article. It definitely is notable and you have done well collecting information about its cultural importance. Blue Rasberry (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Bluerasberry!--Tinpisa (talk) 10:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Diesel Locomotive Works, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Railway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:11, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kingfisher calendar model hunt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingfisher calendar model hunt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 15:26, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are invited to comment here. Joyson Prabhu ^{Holla at me!} 10:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Muhajir people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ayub Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...that these revenge edits of yours don't reflect positively on you?  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 15:36, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

there is no such feeling, my dear friend. We are all here to collectively improve Wikipedia, and don't own anything! There is nothing that you came with in this world and nothing that you shall carry with you ... we are just puppets of the Almighty while we live on Earth, and bid as He directs us. --Tinpisa (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Right... I guess it's just coincidence that after I had one of your articles merged that you're going after articles I created, including attaching a generic speedy tag to one, adding clearly unwarranted footnote tags to two others, then - after I introduce additional citations to two of the articles - requesting citations for almost every unsourced sentence, despite the fact that you don't hold your own created articles to the same standard. This is as obvious as revenge editing gets.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 18:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you meant to say that you had an article merged i.e. I don't think you can manage such things on Wikipedia. I hold nothing against anybody in this world, as I understand that their acts are all controlled by Him. Every fact listed on an article should be sourced, else an editor can surely mark it with a {{cn}} tag. I hope you don't grudge an editor who marks an article with a {{cn}} tag? And you are free to bring instances of unsourced facts on any page I have edited, or to add suitable sources to them. Thanks. --Tinpisa (talk) 09:38, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SupernovaExplosion ^Talk 08:39, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dinesh Trivedi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Economic Times

Indian Railways (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Economic Times

Manu Sharma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Economic Times

Om Prakash Yadav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Siwan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Dinesh Trivedi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

• Note that you only need to add 160 more prose characters to meet the five times expansion requirement. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 21:48, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Have expanded the article. Does it pass? --Tinpisa (talk) 10:19, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A month or so ago the discussion took place regarding indic scripts. It is archieved here and is further clarrified over here. Please go through these. I am reverting your edits on Saif Ali Khan. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 11:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion on a private space is no Wikipedia policy. The main context for the discussion was edit-warring on the native language in the articles. Till the discussion actually translates into a Wikipedia policy and is reflected in the Wikipedia space, it has no status. Also, please note that Bollyjeff was the first one to remove the native language stating that IPA is preferred, and there had been no edit-warring on this issue in the article. As such, your revert is unjustified. May I also point out that your other reversion in the article was also unjustified, as matter added to the lead was already in the main article (with source), and usually does not need to be sourced again when summarized in the lead. Please go through the Wikipedia policies in greater detail and understand them completely. Moreover, your edit summary and writing suggests that you have a weak grasp over English and don't understand the meaning of what you write, as I do not believe you would deliberately demean other editors. Happy learning and editing! --Tinpisa (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the edit just before mine, someone had removed one of two language scripts that were present, indicating a dispute. Wherever I find a dispute, I enforce the agreement. BollyJeff || talk 13:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Wikipedia is not one isolated edit, but repeated editing. Removal of one language script is justification enough to remove the other too! Great logic my friend! --Tinpisa (talk) 13:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to open a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics regarding the concerns you have with the above mentioned two discussions related to Indic scripts. Many editors are going to follow the concensus. Its better that you get it clarified before bumping into all editors on all articles. And thanks for the advice; i will buy one English grammar book. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 13:09, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no such issues, my friend ... have no egos, and don't fear bumping into friendly people :) And don't buy a grammar book - your grammar seems fine. Its just that your sentences sometimes are very offensive to people like us here in Europe. --Tinpisa (talk) 13:22, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your continuous effort on Bhagat Singh to make a GA. Glad to have you around, Keep It Up :-) -- ɑηsuмaη ʈ ᶏ ɭ Ϟ 08:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:55, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Though I am quite sure you'll notice it in your talk page, want to drop a line here that I have started to review the article. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:12, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the GA review for the article has already started. Are you going to return and address the issues? The article might have a chance of passing this time. I will get to work after you are done, and archive all the online references. Joyson Prabhu ^{Holla at me!} 18:34, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Resilient Barnstar
		Thanks for your work on Bhagat Singh and Kingfisher, jai hind!

Parsh (talk) 01:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	excellent work on rail chairman's page.if you can help please contribute to CBDT Chairman's page Harishrawat11 (talk) 16:36, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 15:21, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there,

Tinpisa I have nominated the page Bhagat Singh for Wikipedia:Featured articles, as you can check the talk page of the page and leave your comment, as you have contributed majorly to the page I am informing you the same thanks. You can also check here Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bhagat Singh/archive1. --Dtt1^Talk 22:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]