Hey buddy, i removed your edits to Tehran Imam Khomeini Airport, stating the Air France will halt its services to Tehran in October. Unfortuantley, you did not provide a source to back up your point. If you could just provide me a source to prove your point, I would be obliged. thankyou, User: Megastrike 14 xx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.229.73 (talk) 11:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You did not listen to me. I asked you politley to provide me a source proving your point but you completley ignored me and re-editte the page. If there is no source available to prove that Air France is terminating its services to Tehran, please do not add this point in. If you offend again, I will report you for vandalism and may take further action against you. thankyou, User:Megastrike14

If you would have provided me with that source in the first place then we would not have had this problem would we. all i was asking for was a little cooperation with you but that obviously was too difficult. User:Megastrike14 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.229.73 (talk) 22:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Back in '07 you edited a photo that I had uploaded. I forgot to thank you for making sure that it was correctly labled. Yes, I know its been a long time since then but I just now looked at the images history and saw that you were the one who edited it. ArmoredPersonel (talk) 17:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DCAM0200.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Zvartnotsairport.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Aeroportdequebec.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Zvartnotsairport2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for finding that. I have the NAVCAN CFS and of course it was removed from there some time ago. But I couldn't find anything on the official site to indicate that it was closed and they don't answer email. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way I would be careful about quoting NAV CANADA. Take a look at User talk:CambridgeBayWeather#Nav Canada (my reply at User talk:Stinking Jack) and then NAV CANADA. Those guys can't even update their own site. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I only could find 46 which is why I typed the list out. Also we should let the reader decide the correct version seeing as they both come from the same source. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:03, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports#Airport article structure and then to item #5 it says "...the flight number and the aircraft, starts at this airport and continues to one or more airports." It also says that "Direct flights are not always non-stop flights." Then if you go to First Air Flight Schedule you can see that on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, First Air 866 flies to Iqaluit. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just followed the "Flights Schedule On-Line" link from http://www.admtl.com/passenger_services.aspx?id=45 to http://www.admtl.com/flightschedulesonline.aspx. It also shows that you can get to Iqaluit from CYUL. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:13, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That page uses the NAV CANADA TP577 as a source for movments. That way all the airports are from the same source. Otherwise you would have to list a source for each airport. Plus the fact is that not every airport in Canada counts the same way. They all seem to have larger numbers than NAV CANADA comes up with.

Hello... I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm not sure if this is the place to do this or not, but I noticed that you changed what I put for Thomas Cook Airlines for the Calgary International Airport. You stated that Thomas Cook Airlines only flies from Manchester to Calgary. You deleted my addition of the London Gatwick to Calgary route.

I worked for Thomas Cook Airlines. This summer, in it's tour opertaor conjuction with Canadian Affair, Thomas Cook Airlines flew from London Gatwick to Calgary on Thursdays and Saturdays, and from Manchester to Calgary on Sundays.

You stated that on FlyThomasCook.com it only has Manchester to Calgary. I'm not sure where or why that is stated but I know that they also have a London Gatwick to Calgary route because I work for them in Calgary!

Currently, Thomas Cook does not have any flights to Calgary - this is usual for the winter season as Monarch Airlines serves the routes of London Gatwick and Manchester to Calgary.

So, please stop deleting the London Gatwick to Calgary route. I apologize if this is the wrong area to post this kind of message to you.

-griffinpaul

Thanks fro catching that. I can't believe that in the end I added 1,000 to the movements. Gave me a good laugh. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! While reviewing the assessment change log for Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports, I noticed that you created the article Abel Santa Maria Airport. You contribution to improving Wikipedia's collection of airport articles is greatly appreciated. If at all interested, I'd like to extend an invitation to join the project. You can join by simply adding your name to the list of participants. If not interested, please disregard this message. Thanks! thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 19:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you recently edited the Ottawa Macdonald-Cartier International Airport article to add Air Canada Jazz service from Ottawa to Toronto City Centre. Do you have a source for that? They're still not listing flights at the Air Canada web site. David 23:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply on my talk page. I think that we should revert your change, since Jazz isn't actually flying to City Centre right now — it's probably just stale information on the airport web site. I also received a private e-mail from the manager of CYTZ, and he said that while there have been some negotiations with other carriers, Porter is currently the only one with service to the airport. David 21:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've pulled the City Centre destination off the airport page for now, because it's not verifiable, and will check the CYUL and CYTZ articles as well. You mentioned on my talk page that you had a conversation with a Porter pilot who said Jazz would start flying to City Centre again in January, but even if the pilot's information is accurate, it would be original research, so we can't use it for a Wikipedia article. We have to wait until Jazz makes an official announcement, or some other source publishes the information. Right now, Jazz isn't even selling tickets to City Centre (only two weeks before the Porter pilot told you service will resume). On 14 December, Bill Yule, the director of the airport, sent wrote this in a private e-mail to me: "With respect to Commercial Services Porter Airlines are the only operators at this time and they are flying to Ottawa and Montreal, we have received expressions of interest from others however, nothing concrete has developed yet." We cannot even write that there's a rumour that Jazz will resume service unless we can point to a public source somewhere. David 12:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:200.122.86.50 keeps re-adding AC's service to Algiers. Isn't this against the WP:3RR rule? He's obviously wrong and doesn't appear responsive to attempts to correct his mistakes. Any idea what can be done about this? --BetaCentauri 05:44, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From my understanding, sir, former destinations are okay on airline destination pages but NOT on airport destination pages. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing that. I thought I got it several edits ago but it turns out I still used the wrong one. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 07:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are a user located in Montréal, you may be interested in: Wikipedia:Meetup/Montreal. Please add your name to the "Interested" or to the "Not interested" list. Date is set for May 3rd 2008 and Buffet La Stanza is the proposed location. If you have another idea for the location; propose away! Please pass on to any Montreal Wikis you maybe aware of and who are not yet listed as interested, may be interested, or not interested. Pro bug catcher (talk • contribs). 04:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I noticed you removed the one stop service from Edmonton to Quebec City through Toronto by WestJet. I agree with this change and was wondering what you thought of all the destinations listed from YEG with Canadian North and First Air, considering most of the connections are after a stop in their hub of Yellowknife... Thankyoubaby (talk) 05:45, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thenoflyzone! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SriMesh | talk 05:21, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

There are now images in a gallery on the talk page of this article. If they are of any use in the article... I noticed you were adding info to airline articles...SriMesh | talk 05:23, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Are you interested in a serious Wikimeetup? --Creamy!^Talk 01:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Artush! Viens voir mes photos et n'hésite pas à t'en servir pour tes articles. Phil13 (talk) 22:26, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flight to Barcelona are via Malaga thats why you don't see it on the site. I was on the flight in January 2008.

How come Canadian ATC centers are spelled the American way? Shouldn't Canadian objects, per MOS, be spelled the Commonwealth way (centre)? HkCaGu (talk) 08:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Canadian spelling is "centre". According to WP:ENGVAR, the Canadian spelling should be used in Canadian articles, especially proper names. HkCaGu (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some new planned destinations that you have removed were officially announced http://www.thy.com/en-INT/corporate/investor_relations/special/2008.aspx QUOTE "18.01.2008 Incorporation has decided to operate to Toronto, Washington and Sao Paulo for long haul; for medium haul from Istanbul to Halep (Syria) Birmingham (UK), Lahore (Pakistan) Atrau (Kazakhstan), Oran (Algeria), Lvov (Ukraine), Ufa (Russia) ve İskenderiye (Egypt) in 2008. Based on the arrival date of each new aircraft, exact date of openning each destination will be informed accordingly." UNQUOTE, they should be included in destinations list.116.71.40.45 (talk) 17:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for seeing that. It was the template that was the problem, cutting off after 37/38 airlines. For now I've restored an older version using both the un-named and named parameters until 3247 can fix it. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 10:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's been fixed now. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 21:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why arent you preventing that person Dimitree from arranging the destinations list according to his own prefernces? he created a section "CIS" i.e Commonwealth of Independant States which is a political group of post-Soviet states of the former Soviet Union, and not a region of any continent, are people going to be allowed to list destinations under "European Union" next instead of Europe, or "SAARC" instead of South Asia? he also didnt list the destinations of Asia as they should be listd region wise but creatd his own version with some countries in CIS others as Asian the rest as Middle East, I thought editors were supposed to correct articles and mainatin wiki formats.116.71.63.229 (talk) 18:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a couple of opinions on how airlines should be in a table. Can you comment at the above link. Thanks. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 23:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - Please do not cite a personal online blog or discussion forum as a source - this is not in line with the project rules. Refer WP:Airports. Thanks. Jasepl (talk) 04:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Once again, please see the Wikipedia Policies and guidelines, specifically Verifiability and Reliability. Personal blogs and discussion forums are not typically considered valid sources of information. Thanks. Jasepl (talk) 19:22, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you remove those that are not listed correctly, are you planning to list these in the correct article? Also there is at least one that you removed that was correctly listed. The piped name was different then the article, but the article probably should be used without being piped. Vegaswikian (talk) 08:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've seen you claim that Sky Georgia has no traffic right between Berlin and Budapest on their planned Tiblisi-Budapest-Berlin trip. ist this also true for the return trip? What are your sources? Per aspera ad Astra (talk) 17:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 05:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's just 1 day until the contest begins, so I thought I'd check in with everyone and make sure you're all ready to go. First I'd like everyone to check out the main contest page and read over the rules and the scoring system. If you have any final questions or concerns, make them known on the talk page. Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/History/2009 is the scoreboard that will be updated, you can watchlist it. Check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/Submissions which shows how your submission page should look. Another example is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/Submissions Example, and your personal page should be listed at the footer of the page, which is also at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/Users. Again, take any questions to the contest talk page.

Good luck! - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 21:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the dates to "seasonal" as it will be suspended for the winter then returns next summer. 74.183.173.237 (talk) 01:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Need your help. One IP continue to add New York-LaGuardia as a hub for American Airlines. So far, me and Zaps23 do not say that LGA is not a hub. I have started a discussion at the American Airlines talk page to settle this. If you get a chance, id appreciate your comments. Regards! 74.183.173.237 (talk) 03:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Physical locations of countries, keeping in mind their primary landmass (not islands etc):

• Fully in Asia:

1. Armenia
2. Cyprus

• Partly in Asia, partly in Africa

1. Egypt - Sinai is in Asia

• Partly in Asia, partly in Europe

1. Azerbaijan - lies both north and south of the Caucasus
2. Georgia - lies both north and south of the Caucasus
3. Kazakhstan - lies both east and west of the Urals
4. Russia - lies both east and west of the Urals
5. Turkey - Thrace is in Europe; the rest in Asia

Their political, cultural, historical leanings are immaterial. Thanks. Jasepl (talk) 20:52, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The UN isn't wrong, and you opinion isn't wrong either. But yiu need to look at the basis on which the UN forms its subregions. Physical location is not the UN's only criteria; convenience, commonality , etc have all been factored in. That is why there are so many differing opinions of what lies where.. Pooking at pure physical location, there will be slight differences. Jasepl (talk) 21:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I see on your user page that you live in Montreal. I am going to assume that you have heard of Place Ville-Marie in asking you this question. The reports of the number of floors in Place Ville-Marie vary from 43 to 46. Do you, with your Montreal expertise, know the actual number of floors in this structure, or could you possibly visit this building to find out? Thanks,

-Stuck in Edmonton 117Avenue (talk) 22:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have absolutely no idea. To tell you the truth, I've never been to that building. Thenoflyzone (talk) 16:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks anyways. 117Avenue (talk) 20:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is'nt it a rule to have bold text for country names as per British Airways destinations?118.103.230.193 (talk) 17:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Artush!

I suggest you use the new userbox I designed on your user page:

User:Phil13/TRACON

Just type the double accolades before and after to use it!Phil13 (talk) 20:33, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thenoflyzone,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ^{☎ call me!}

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:59, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your message. WestJet operates a lot of same plane service throughout Canada, for example: Grande Prairie - Edmonton - Calgary - Kamloops - Vancouver is all on the same plane with the same flight number. It would make little sense to list all of those destinations under the Grande Prairie Airport article right? There should be a limit, maybe if the flight continues to an international destination then it is ok, but not another domestic aiport, especially a hub like YYZ. Just my thought. Thankyoubaby (talk) 00:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - some of your recent edits of airports and there seasonal flights. From what I can see it hasn't been updated onto Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports or is there any other article where it has been updated. I'm not going to undo yours edits as I have no problem with them but other people may have. Jamie2k9 (talk) 23:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was there any announcement for these routes?? I can't find this in their press release nor i don't see any flights bookable. Snoozlepet (talk) 23:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there was a mention of the airline planning to start service ORD-HEL and ORD-BUD in April 2011. But we can't list it until an exact date is announced. Users continue to add April 4 as start date but can't find any nonstop flights on or after that date. Snoozlepet (talk) 23:53, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ողջույն, հարգելի Thenoflyzone: Ես Հայերեն Վիքիպեդիայի մասնակիցներից մեկն եմ: Վերջերս քննարկվել է Արևմտահայերեն Վիքիպեդիայի ստեղծումը (քննարկումը կարող եք գտնել այստեղ) և Հայերեն Վիքիպեդիայի համայնքը եկավ այն եզրակացության, որ կարելի է ստեղծել Արևմտահայերեն Վիքիպեդիա, բայց եթե որ գոնե մի քանի մասնակից, որոնք խոսում են արևմտահայերեն լեզվով, կխոստանան որ կմասնակցեն Արևմտահայեն Վիքիպեդիայում: Եթե դուք համաձայն եք և կաջակցեք այդ նախագծին, ապա գրեք ձեր անունը այստեղ և հաղորդեք այս լուրը մյուս հայ մասնակիցներին: Շնորհակալություն:--Pandukht (talk) 17:44, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know that I changed Toronto Pearson International Airport to the StatCan numbers. That way all the airports use the same source rather than the self reported numbers. While I was updating the articles I noticed that Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport has 770,000 for passengers in 2009. That would make them the 15th busiest in Canada. Not only that but they had a 60% in aircraft movements in 2010. So based on that in the "Canada's 15 busiest airports by passenger traffic" section I dropped Fort McMurray Airport and added Billy Bishop. Unfortunately StatsCan don't provide passenger numbers for Billy Bishop as per the Statistics Act. I guess it's some sort of secret. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 07:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I missed the fact that in February they changed "Toronto City Centre" to "Billy Bishop Toronto City" and then to "Toronto/Billy Bishop Toronto City". That put the airport in three different places on the tables. I'll redo the numbers. Thanks for seeing that. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All of them from Boundary Bay to Toronto/Buttonville Municipal are wrong. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 23:34, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DL has suspended the flight for the winter and will resume next summer. Is this seasonal or a year round route. 166.137.14.13 (talk) 18:41, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's now seasonal, since there is a break in service. Thenoflyzone (talk) 17:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you get a chance, can you keep an eye on this page? A user continues to disambiguate Oakland (CA), Newark, and Frankfurt. He keeps stating that these cities are served by the city the airport is in (OAK serving San Francisco, Newark serving NYC, etc). Wasnt this discussed already? 166.137.13.249 (talk) 00:00, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thenoflyzone! We need some consensus quickly regarding listing of UA/CO destinations in airport articles. Please come to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#CO.2FUA_SOC_2011-11-30 at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, HkCaGu (talk) 04:17, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Air Berlin destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Las Vegas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Jazz (airline), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion was started here at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports#Airlines_and_Destinations_tables on whether or not we should link destinations since we are in a table format. We are trying to reach a firm consensus and your comments are appreciated. Thanks! Snoozlepet (talk) 23:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know if the CNV9 is confirmed? I see they have it on the site but as of the latest Canada Flight Supplement (July 26) there is no listing for the airport or the code. I also looked at the NAV CANADA site, checked the NOTAM and METAR and both say it's an invalid code. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 04:15, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As you said, even the airport is not in the CFS yet. I was hoping AIS would make it for the July 26 publication, but i guess not. Hopefully for the next issue. Until then, since there is at the least the airport website source, i guess we could leave it as is for now.Thenoflyzone (talk) 01:24, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I suspect they have applied for the code but it just hasn't worked its way through the system yet. I'd just leave it too, easy enough to change it later. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 01:35, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a preview of the CNV9 CFS page coming online Sept. 20, 2012. http://www.ailesquebecoises.com/phannonce/CNV9_CFS.jpg

Thenoflyzone (talk) 00:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can you record the pronunciation of the word caisse with an Quebec accent please ? Fête (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Delta Connection destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:40, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you created List of airports in Nagorno-Karabakh a couple of years ago. It has but a single entry and so seems rather pointless. Can it not be merged into a Transport section at Nagorno-Karabakh and redirected there? - Sitush (talk) 10:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it can i suppose. Mind doing it? Thenoflyzone (talk) 14:12, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, thanks. - Sitush (talk) 07:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thenoflyzone, I'm contacting you because we need some Armenian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hy.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need assistance with a personal message for the Armenian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 16:52, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, Air Canada Express is a brand...not a certified airline, it operates regional feeder flights for Air Canada. It is just like Delta Connection, United Express, American Eagle, and US Airways Express. So, it can't hub. 68.119.73.36 (talk) 03:37, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thenoflyzone. You have new messages at Synchronism's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello. This is not the first time I revert ([1], [2]) some of your unreferenced edits. Given that your first edit occurred in Octobre 2006, you should know by now that there exists a policy on verifiability. Please stop adding unsourced content into articles. Thanks.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• You do realize that the mileage for all the other flights on that list are not sourced right? Besides, My source isn't there to claim the mileage, my source (which i just replaced with the official AA.com one) is there to claim the start of the new route. The mileage is taken from where it is almost always taken on that page, which is gcmap.com

Thenoflyzone (talk) 10:44, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• • That's why there's a tag at the top of the article indicating the need of more sources. The lack of references is not an entitlement for adding more unsourced content. Yes, you provided a reference for your edit. As I said, it is out of context: it did not support the fact that the flight will be among the longest non-stop ones. It only says American will start that flight.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • Another unsourced statement. Is it so hard for you to add a citation showing that KLM withdrew its operations from Doha International Airport?--Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for updating the Pulkovo airport page to take into account the new terminal. However, I think a bit more clarification work would be useful as this currently reads this way: "In the near term, Pulkovo strategically focuses on its master plan until 2025 that calls for massive modernization of the entire airport infrastructure. A new terminal will be located directly to the north of the Terminal 1 and will contain 18 gates. The construction was planned to begin in 2008 with scheduled completion in 2010/11, but construction started only in spring 2011 with opening for passengers expected in December 2013. The new Terminal 1 opened on February 14, 2014. All operations have now been consolidated into the new terminal as the old Pulkovo-1 and Pulkovo-2 terminals have been shut down." I think the "A new terminal will be located..." part refers to the new terminal which opened in February 2014, so using 'will' is no longer accurate. I'm not sure how to properly reword this though, hence this message :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChristopheFergeau (talk • contribs) 17:17, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk: Boeing 777#Boeing 77X Split. Thanks. Baseball Watcher 15:01, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:04, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of football stadiums in Mexico page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SideshowBob7. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Garuda Indonesia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The intent to purchase is not an order. SideshowBob7 (talk) 22:27, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,33aircharter in reply to your message regarding Air China flight between Havana and Beijing. According to your message sent to me then why do you have both Montreal and Beijing flight begins (28 DEC 2015) on that date on the Havana section? That is a misleading statement in that it will make someone think two plane services will be flying on that same date to Havana instead of one. As the source state Air China flies BEI-YUL-HAV return HAV-YUL-BEI, which is an extension of the present ongoing flight between BEI-YUL. so in that case my edit was not false. 33aircharter (talk) 15:49, 20 NOV 2015 (UTC)

Yes it is wrong. Taken straight from WP:AIRPORTS page content section.

"List non-stop and direct flights only. That means the flight number and the aircraft, starts at this airport and continues to one or more airports. Avoid using the description 'via' since that is more correctly listed as another destination. If passengers can not disembark at a stop on a direct flight, then do not list it as a destination or as 'via'. Direct flights are not always non-stop flights. However, avoid listing direct flights that contain a stop at a domestic hub, as virtually all of these are simply flights from one "spoke city" to a hub, with the plane continuing from the hub to a second spoke city. Furthermore, these flights often involve plane changes, despite the direct designation. Including these flights dramatically increases the length of destination listings, artificially inflates the airline's presence at a location and requires constant updating, as these "timetable direct" destinations have little rhyme or reason and may change as often as every week or two."

So as you see, YUL should be listed on the HAV airport page, same as PEK, because Air China will be selling seats to Montreal as well, and it is the same plane, same flight number operating.

Thenoflyzone (talk) 20:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

33aircharter So then why are you continuing to use both begins 28th dec 2015 don't matter what excuse you come up with when flights is listed like that it means that two separate aircrafts flies the two destinations so that's why its important to make an additional note. E.g look at the Barbados, Tobago, Saõ Paulo page what do you see? Gol flight operate GRU-BGI-TAB and return TAB-BGI-GRU, it is an extended flight so all you have to do is change via and put what think is best. since Air China is not a Montrèal hub the airline will fly from PEK to YUL pick up and drop off passengers then continue completion in Havana. passengers can book from PEK to YUL & YUL-PEK but the ones who book PEK-HAV have to remain on the plane, passengers cannot book flights from YUL-HAV nor from HAV-YUL so therefore passengers travelling to PEK from HAV will remain on the plane when arrive at YUL. hope you understand. thanks. —Preceding undated comment added 13:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to provide your input at this discussion regarding references and the Airlines and destinations tables? Thank you! — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 23:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thenoflyzone. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.73.87.74.115 (talk) 14:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide a source stating that Vancouver is year-round? All Delta mainline service is summer seasonal. Do you know which destinations from YVR are operated year-round. Thanks! TravelLover37 (talk) 04:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thenoflyzone. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you may be aware, there was a recent discussion on the talk page of WP:Airports which prematurely and without consensus resulted in mass changes to airport articles throughout Wikipedia. Before a drastic change like this is put into practice, it is important to have clear consensus, which from my readings as an observer, did not occur. Many of these changes started to occur before any real discussion had taken place, and despite much disagreement from some community members. Disagreement is good -- it's great actually -- without it nothing would ever get done. But it's important that everyone opinions are heard fairly and accurately, and that significant changes like merging the Regional Airline destinations with the Mainline destinations are not done without such consensus. I encourage you, as someone involved in WP:Airports and the original discussion, to voice your opinions and discuss with others about how we should move forward at this point. Positive and constructive conversation is the way to a consensus. I also ask that everyone (myself included) ceases merging or un-merging mainline/regional destinations until a censuses is reached. Please contribute to the conversation here. Tofutwitch11 ^(TALK) 00:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skyservice destinations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyservice destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rhadow (talk) 12:45, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thenoflyzone. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleague, thanks for your update about EK operations to GIG. However, I encourage you to check a later update (4AUG) on Routes Online [3] stating that not only EZE and SCL are cancelled but also GIG. Sometimes Routes Online has mistakes so should you have other information please advise. FYI tourist specialized media in Rio has already announced the indefinite cancellation of EK flight to GIG. Before reverting back, I thought I would drop you a line first. BRGDS (Brunoptsem (talk) 15:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC))[reply]

thanks. Just saw that. Reverted my edits. I also checked on emirates.com and GIG isn't bookable for the foreseeable future. Thenoflyzone (talk) 18:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know why Qatar Airways cancelled booking flights to YYZ, and if/when the flight will return? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.229.208.70 (talk) 19:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Qatar's bilateral agreement with Canada is maxed out with 4x weekly frequencies a week, currently all being used for YUL. They received extra-bilateral approval to operate 3x weekly service to YYZ for the month of July only. Hence why the flights are no longer bookable. QR should have never advertised the new route in the first place. Fake news, so to speak, as it's not a new route, just a temporary permission, due to COVID. Yes, the flights were bookable online, but QR made it seem like the route was a permanent addition. It isn't. Air India has received the same kind of approval for YVR service this month, yet they never announced it as a new route.Thenoflyzone (talk) 20:17, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

oh okay, thank you so much for the explanation. do you think the service will return to toronto? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.229.208.70 (talk) 01:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No Thenoflyzone (talk) 02:48, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]