Hello and welcome to Wikiproject Environment--Alex 07:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have got one link here. I really do not get you when you say that you could not find article about Pastor Don. Well I did find it and here it is.Pastor Don And I tell you please if you do not like the page going on just delete it.rencin24 rencin24 09:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i've been honing Kohlberg's stages of moral development for a little while now, and noticed on your user page that you have a degree in philosophy. the article has a section on philosophical assumptions, but seeing as i have no formal knowledge in the subject i'd really love it if you could give at least that part of the text a look-over. if you're curious i guess - if not, sorry to bother. cheers. :) JoeSmack ^Talk(p-review!) 07:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, The Way, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Strothra 06:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good hello. I was just perusing the AfD page and came across your comments on the Pokemon episodes. If you feel so inclined, please stop by Project: Trivia cleanup and join us in our quest to rid the encyclopedia of unsourced foolishness. Cheers. L0b0t 15:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Way.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm you might want to get triming then Category:Simpsons episodes looks like it has quite a few episodes listed. ;) Whispering 22:40, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support in this discussion, however, I noticed that you stated that this article may have encyclopedic value. I would disagree and would like to point out that the term itself is not in academic or popular usage and although it may have been used by one academic, that hardly meets the standards of notability. The ideas in the article merit encyclopedic value insofar as they are presented in a historical context within the article Race Science. The term itself, however, is not encyclopedic nor are the ideas in the article presented in a historical context. The ideas in the article used contemporary research to support them, yes. That research, however, is being twisted by the author in order to promote his ideas (which happen to be once accepted enough to be notable). That's the problem with origional research - you can manipulate it to support whatever ideas you'd like in a forum such as this. I hope that this sheds more light on my position. --Strothra 04:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Way, I was coming to your page and noticed your nifty gay banner. I'm also gay and would like to know where you get all those banners you have up. Are they accesible by anyone?

On this Ughmonster thing, I normally woulnd't even comemnt because it's none of my business but it seems like that Midge guy and that other one are unfairly targeting Ughmonster simply because they don't like his article. Things like telling him not to comment when everybody else is commenting, and taking what was obviously a joke and making a problem out of it.

It would be cool if you could come down on Ugh's side a little and just tell EVERYONE to shut up already, that innappropriate sheninigans are happening on all sides. Ugh is clearly being a little babyish about the whole thing but it looks like he's trying to gracefully drop it and these guys just keep dogging him.

That's my two cents, take it or leave it. But please do get me that info. I wanna build my page. --ConeyIslandBoy 16:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comments in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Achaia Football Clubs and I want to tell you that I strongly agree with you. The guys there told me that I am anti-Greek and it only has no interest by me. How ever what I see all the foreigns who came supported its deletion. However, after they saw that they had no support, they coaliated and together agreed to find more Greeks to save the article, eventhough the non-Greeks do not want it (see contributions of FocalPoint, user:Tony esopi patra and more specifically of Georgeg). I would like from you if you could help and bring more people to vote DELETE because in wikipedia there will be an article eventhough is unimportant because some Greeks feel so patriotic to have stupid information in wikipedia (not a coincidence that they called me Anti-Greek). Interesting to see User talk:Georgeg --KRBN 16:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give your vote on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAEEK please? --KRBN 16:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I see you've argued for delete in the above-mentioned AfD. Since your position was motivated by the absence of a claim to notability in the article in question, I thought you may be interested in knowing that subsequent edits have indeed included one such claim in the article, and fetched two references for it. You may want to give the article another look and see whether you become satisfied by that claim or still think deletion is in order. Thanks! --Nehwyn 11:31, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I got to your page from the Trivia Cleanup WikiProject page. I need advice regarding an article that I believe to be trivia. Because I am a WP newbie, I hesitate to do anything about it by myself. Could you please take a look at Elvira Arellano and tell me what you think? If it's not trivia, fine, I'll accept that and move on. But if it is, then what's the next step? Thanks —Chicaneo 09:05, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Elvira Arellano was nominated for deletion by another editor. Your input would be appreciated! Thanks -- Shunpiker 23:26, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. You may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of North Carolina Tower Chapel Hill, which I have just listed. I would appreciate your input. --Descendall 09:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Happy and Prosperous New Year to you ..The Way..thanks for your advice and help..and your absolutly right and I will make sure I am more thorough in future but this was great learning experience for me and for that I am grateful..I feel I can never learn enough..also the way if I have souces like legitimatly published books that are not on the net as well as legal documents and Newspapaer articles are these acceptable and how would I have to quote them, and then load all the other government archived documents later (from Fijian affairs board and Native lands commission)?? please advise MB 21:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Keni_Naulumatua_II"

I was wondering if you were still active with the Trivia Cleanup project. Seeing as how Category:Articles with large trivia sections hasn't gone down much, I figured many people became inactive. I've created a talk page discussion here, asking if people are active or not: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Trivia_Cleanup#Who_is_still_active_with_the_project.3F. RobJ1981 08:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 21:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot is most definitely useful and necessary, though I have one problem with it. Currently, when it signs something it leaves a rather long message to the effect of "The previous unsigned comment was posted by..." in small text. The wording seems to give the impression that the editor who forgot to sign did something wrong. Can't the bot simply sign the editors username in a normal sized font with no additional text? --The Way 07:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK it just uses the standard {{unsigned}} template, which is used when you "sign" somebody else's work. — RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib} 15:45, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I did see that. I did the AfD with the belief that it would quickly dead the whole issue, though I gotta say I don't mind seeing my handle up in lights. -- Kendrick7^talk 16:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a barnstar for Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment. Please visit the talk page to vote for the barnstar since there are no votes for 2 months. OhanaUnited 20:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have just created two new articles one being Fijian Religion and the other being Fijian Tradition & Ceremony, your input and help would be very much appreciated when you have the time.

Vinaka Vaka Levu Maikeli MB 02:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on the Development Economics article! I am doing a month-long course on it using the same textbook you cited for most of your sources, and will do my best to add to and criticize your work. (It's like studying, only worthwhile to society!)

NByz 06:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are being recruited by the Environmental Record Task Force, a collaborative project committed to accurately and consistently representing the environmental impact of policymakers, corporations, and institutions throughout the encyclopedia. Join us!

Hi,
I'm hoping you'll come have a look at this new project--we could really use someone with your expertise/interest in Intl. Development and Environment. (PS. Do you know the Bonnie "Prince" Billy song "The Way"? One of my favorites!)
Cyrusc

Hi, some text you added to History of Africa on 04:50, 28 October 2006 has been flagged as a possible copyright violation. Could you have a look at the discussion on the talk page. Thanks. Ha! (talk) 10:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it might be a good idea to run a contest or two through the Countries WikiProject to attract editors to improve country coverage on Wikipedia, especially the country outlines.

I noticed you are a member of the WikiProject, and was wondering if you could help.

I've posted a message at Countries WikiProject talk page to get discussion started on what the awards programs should be and how they should be run.

Your ideas and feedback would be greatly appreciated.

The Transhumanist 23:44, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gentle admonition You may want to review this edit to Illinois (album). As you correctly point out, there was a lot of original research in there, but some cited information as well; could none of that be retained? If you want to respond, please do so on my talk. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of WikiProject Countries, I'm seeking your opinion on a possible issue identified at List of sovereign states. If you have some spare moments, please contribute a comment at the Discussion of criteria. Best regards, Nightw 07:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings The Way-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 18:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The Way I've come across some comments you made regarding this article and concerns that it sounds like an advertisement and I tend to agree. First, should let you know up front that I have a WP:COI and represent the Company. In looking at the article, we have noticed a number of inaccuracies including the wrong logo, misspellings, listing of products that no longer exist, confusion over which products are actually "frozen dairy deserts" vs. "ice cream" and in some instances lack of references.

I think you get the picture:) In any case, given your previous perspective I am wondering if you might consider working to address some if not all of these issues. Breyers would like to see its article be of the highest quality possible and have all the information it includes fall in line with Wikipedia guidelines.

If you agree, I am happy to work it through however you would like. Can identify the specific issues and provide you with the references and leave it up for your consideration to make the changes or not. Alternatively, I am happy to make the updates but would appreciate a watchful eye to ensure all the changes are in line with Wikipedia guidelines.

Appreciate your consideration of this. SusanChana (talk) 16:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:The Way, the Wikipedian.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo for user page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 21:14, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]