Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

• meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
• or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
  

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eleonora Kopalinsky and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rsfisher132! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dorothy Pile, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, TheResilientEngineer, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you have already created three biographies of women engineers and now intend to cover many more. You should be able to improve your biographies by following the guidance in our Primer. In particular, you should base your articles on reliable independent sources rather than on links to items closely associated with the subject. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Ipigott thank you for the guidance. I'm an academic and the style of referencing is different to what I'm used to. I'm trying to get better. I have two observations/questions. 1)people don't write "secondary sources" about women because....the way the world is. and 2) the criteria for notability particularly for academics is systematically exclusive to women because they don't get to be head of departments for example. Particularly historically. I'm not sure this means that they are not notable, but I'm not sure how to navigate this issue.

Perhaps I need to be more specific about screening which women to look into? I was trying to do all of the past presidents of the Women's Engineering Society but there are very few "reliable secondary sources" for these women because they are not deemed to be relevant beyond the society's own journal.

Any advice would be great. Thanks! TheResilientEngineer (talk) 19:00, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I sympathize, TheResilientEngineer, with the difficulties you express. You will see the same points have frequently been made in press reports and research papers. There has fortunately been some recent progress in awareness of the need for women to be covered more extensively in biographical dictionaries, critical assessments and specialized journals but much more needs to be done. One of the reasons Wikipedia looks for secondary sources is that many individuals, both men and women, are keen to promote themselves and their colleagues on the basis of their qualifications and achievements but if these are not covered independently, there may indeed be a lack of notability. As you gain experience, you may find support through The Wikipedia Library but for now I think you should try to concentrate on women who have received informative coverage in at least three recognized independent sources. Women engineers certainly deserve further attention. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:31, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott thank you for the guidance and encouragement! TheResilientEngineer (talk) 22:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317 Online events: New: Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Islands A - H Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (Jul, Aug, Sep) Announcements from other communities August 30 is the tenth anniversary of WikiProject Women writers! Tip of the month: Try her pen name when searching for sources, and remember to add her to any of these that apply: List of pen names, List of literary initials, and Category:Pseudonymous women writers. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Veronica Milligan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zeromonk (talk) 10:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to National Cycle Route 46. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GrabUp - Talk 11:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:National Cycle Route 46 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 08:22, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

National Cycle Route 46, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320 Online events: New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon Tip of the month: Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of National Academies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of National Academies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UzbukUdash (talk) 11:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of fellows of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alex Brown, Frank Caruso and David Moss. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:02, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheResilientEngineer,

Please sign all of your posts on talk pages, noticeboards and deletion discussions. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323 Online events: New: Asian women | Geofocus: Islands Q-Z | Women in engineering Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Annual Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) is an online campaign designed to boost Asian content on Wikipedia each November. Unreferenced articles backlog drive. These Wikiproject clean-up lists offer a start to November's backlog drive, e.g. Women's History and Women writers Tip of the month: Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed images at search.creativecommons.org/ Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danielle Zaikoff and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thilsebatti (talk) 13:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Winifred Pink. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because I think you meant to move it here, and the sources are a little wanting, anyways. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 16:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I think this belongs to you. Nice work on Winifred Pink. I boldly moved it to main space. I say "boldly" but it was more than ready and it inspired me to start Ladies' Automobile Club. Victuallers (talk) 11:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Victuallers oh amazing. another reviewer thought it needed more references which I've struggled to find! thank you for moving it I think it's ready too. others can add as they please then. you got to the LAC before me nice work! I hope you found the piece from the national motor museum? if not I can send the link or add it in. let me know! TheResilientEngineer (talk) 13:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Opinions vary but three good refs is the bar that I use and if there are 1,500 origial characters of text then its a start article. I moved Zaikoff with that criteria. I added an extra ref but it wasn't necessary IMO. You realise that you are able to use Page,Move to publish your own articles? We do see OK-articles that get stuck in AfC. None of the Women in Red regulars use this method. You can leave a message on the/my talk page if you have an article that you would like an informal review of, before publishing yourself. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 15:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Victuallers you have the national motor museum ref! excellent work on LAC! originally I moved Pink from my user space straight to articles. a reviewer moved it to draft because they thought I'd done it in error and there weren't enough refs. which I was a little surprised by but I'm still new so figured they were right. your guidance here is a helpful guide though, thank you! TheResilientEngineer (talk) 17:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Victuallers also thank you for the barnstar!! i had to look it up as it's my first one and I'm still pretty new! TheResilientEngineer (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325 Online events: New: Women who died in 2024 | Religion Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Women in Religion have a monthly virtual edit-a-thon and the next session is December 2nd 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. CST. For Zoom meeting details, contact Dzingle1 or RosPost. Women in Red members are welcome to join the Zoom Meeting here Tip of the month: Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]