Archives

July 2006 – December 2007 December 2007 – June 2008

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar Thanks for all your contributions to the article Late Night With Conan O'Brien! For all your work, I would like to present you with this Tireless Contributor Barnstar. aido2002 05:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about reverting your edit to Rock-paper-scissors, but then my brain went off on a "but what does random really mean, anyway? I mean really mean?", and I had to leave your edit alone to shut my brain up. Then you reverted it! Cretog8 (talk) 07:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I thought I heard him say that when I first watched. I went back and checked the DVR just now, and when the second team arrives at Jon's bench, he says "...good news, you've made it to the halfway point..." It could have been him just being folksy, and some small talk, but if the elapsed time is an indication, it's probably about right. So since he said "halfway point," I think it's fair for us to include that phrase. Doctorindy (talk) 13:10, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on this article. I'd made a start on the whole mess of original research and fancruft that it had become, but you've really whipped it into shape now. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You took down something of mine and I would like to work with you so I can become better at editing Wikipedia.
It was on the Mythbusters page. I am new, but please assume I know not to soap-box, post original research or loose NPOV. Privately I do have some observations about the recent seasons of the show:

The PETA point is the only one of encyclopedic merit. I believe this is the case because Mythbusters is setting a precedent for other developing media. Mythbusters is a part of semi-mature class of television which has little 4^th wall and a lot of internet participation.

I was careful with my change. Berrying in mind, Non-original research is hard to find for most any television show. Also that I want to keep the page only containing the most relevant information. I felt that expanding the sentence on cockroaches to illuminate a general trend was the best solution. I don’t think it was too wordy. The first version is 96 words and my version is 98.

I changed this:

The program generally avoids experiments harmful to animals and people that cannot be tested safely, though in one episode they bombarded cockroaches and other laboratory insects with lethal doses of radiation and the cast addressed this, saying that the insects were specifically bred for experiments and would have likely died anyway. In another episode, Kari Byron intentionally allowed herself to be stung by a jellyfish, though it was revealed beforehand by an expert at the aquarium where the jellyfish was obtained that the experiment they had planned would not be a serious threat to Kari's safety.

To this:

While Mythbusters is science, it also follows the rule of not harming living things for the purpose of entertainment. In one episode Adam was required to be sprayed by a skunk. However the teem couldn’t mistreat the animal in any way. Several attempts and environments where tried until finally the behavior was induced in a PETA approved manner. An exception to this is an episode where cockroaches and other laboratory insects where bombarded with lethal doses of radiation. The cast addressed the morality, saying that the insects were specifically bred for experiments and would have likely died anyway.
Is there any part of this which belongs on Wikipedia? Pstaight (talk) 13:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw a listing on TVGuide.com for next week's show, as it is a two-hour finale, and the teams will be broken up and there will be three elimination challenges. I just thought you'd like to know. NoseNuggets (talk) 4:53 AM US EDT Jul 29 2008.

MOS:SCROLL Gary King (talk) 07:26, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Good work on the article. It appears the article took a bit of a beating format wise while I took my eye off it, though! Can I ask what you think about the date format in the article (uses 21 August 2008 standard)? Jamaica is also written thus but Jamaican news websites seem to be favouring the American standard. The article was originally written with British dates and lexicon and I reverted the changes against this but am now unsure about whether this is how the article should be written.

Also, it appears I had misunderstood the purpose of a lead - to summarise the only most important feats of the athlete (not to summarise the article as a whole). I currently have Dwain Chambers at FAC and I think you could really help me out. Only one editor is making suggestions currently and there seems to be little interest in editing athletics articles on wikipedia anyway. Any thoughts/suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanks Sillyfolkboy (talk) 15:09, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You rejected my edits about the outcome of a possible playoff. How is it obvious? Just curious. 98.192.44.39 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 03:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to say that the reason I might've had the one possibly of a playoff is because there is an episode I've seen in which nobody solved the second $250 puzzle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.192.44.39 (talk) 15:22, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your {{fact}} / ^{[citation needed]} in the article Salary cap#Reserve clause: If you are interested in why the NHL had a salary cap in the 1930s, it is because the Great Depression. Two teams (out of ten) folded in the early 30s, while other teams were forced to restrict players' salaries. This should have a reference in the article, though. — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 15:27, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ebo1.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:16, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's an entire section for "History." It isn't necessary to include historical data, specifically related to previous cash distributions, in the main body of the article.

The column format is not consistently used throughout Wikipedia and looked awkward in your edit. The two tables weren't the same height and bullet points/explanations didn't line up. Sottolacqua (talk) 12:45, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your talk page message to User:Wheeler0152, you might not be aware that date autoformatting was sadly deprecated last August after some long and protracted battles over the issue. Robert K S (talk) 19:18, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You got it right--it will still work, but we're "not supposed" to use it. The changeover took me by surprise, too. It would seem like the kind of guideline change that should be featured on the front page. Robert K S (talk) 15:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this discussion is now beyond my number of levels of "undo". Robert K S (talk) 19:48, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Bnyok1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 14:11, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ho ho ho. That's some funny stuff... Sillyfolkboy (talk) 03:27, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping Alientraveller with those concerns during the GA review. Wildroot (talk) 21:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Palmer1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 00:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware that you actually reverted my changes that were done to improve the article? --Pwnage8 (talk) 07:33, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought I'd bring that to your attention, that's all. I was wondering the same thing about it letting you make the edit. --Pwnage8 (talk) 08:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar! I really appreciate the comments too. I have to say I spent (too) many hours researching that article so I hope you've enjoyed working on it and reading it. Cheers. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 16:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, A couple of weeks ago I modified an image and then uploaded it to the Barenaked Ladies article. You reverted my edit, [1] but gave no meaningful reason in your edit summary or did not leave any message on my talk page as why the edit was inappropriate. I feel that the new image, (with the black background removed), helps the reader see the subject easier.
Both Images for comparison:

• 
  Original
• 
  Blue Background

-- GateKeeper^(X) @ 18:58, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for your response, however in the future try to leave your comment on my talk page and not my user page :( . My reason for trying to eliminate the dark background was that others had commented in the past they had trouble distinguishing his hair from the background. I don't care which image is left in the article, as long as it is the version that helps readers the best, something probably best discussed at the talk page of the article.

As a courtesy I would also like to let you to know that I used the image at his profile page, you may review it and use your best judgment to revert it if you feel that it does not contribute to the article. -- GateKeeper^(X) @ 19:20, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheHYPO, On the 1st of December 2007, you edited the Micrurus fulvius article to add a link to candy cigarette, since at the time "Candy stick" redirected to Micrurus fulvius. After that, I changed the "Candy stick" redirect to a disambiguation page and moved your link there. Currently, Candy stick is a new article on the hard candy and the original disambiguation page is called Candy stick (disambiguation). The last question that was raised, however, asks whether "candy stick" really is a legitimate alternative name for "candy cigarette" or not. Since you came up with the association, I was wondering if perhaps you could clarify the matter and possibly produce a reference. I think the best soltution would be to add the name and the reference to the "candy cigarette" article. Thanks, (PS -- Please answer here, as I've temporarily added your talk page to my watchlist). --Jwinius (talk) 01:39, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey J; I checked the talk pages of all of the relevant articles I could find and I didn't see any ask about the cigs. At least one brand has gone this way: popeye candy cigs were changed, at some point, in at least some markets, to be billed as popeye candy sticks. I believe, though this would be original research without a citation, that the move was made in recent years due to the obvious argument against offering children candy that portrays cigarettes as enjoyable. I'm not sure how many, or what other companies have taken similar moves. I hope this helps. TheHYPO (talk) 07:04, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good enough! Thanks, --Jwinius (talk) 11:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your edit of this article on 10/28/08. Thank you. Faethon Ghost (talk) 14:37, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't the amount of guest stars in this season eclipse other seasons? I mean some of the episodes were clearly just written strictly FOR the guest stars with no real plot. That season was the beginning of the end for the Simpsons and you can even hear the blade as it moves across the bottom of the wooden barrel. Faethon Ghost (talk) 14:59, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have fun on the comfy bottom of the barrel. Say hi to Bart's twin for me. Must be nice down there. Faethon Ghost (talk) 05:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Early bird dinner, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early bird dinner. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Brideshead_{(leave a message)} 21:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Newset1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Obrienaudition1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. seresin ( ¡? )  09:15, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to keep you updated, User:Gsnviewer is also User:Debbiesvoucher, User:Dooyar, User:Nyannrunning, etc., who is permanently banned for sock puppet violations. I've been (slowly) working up an SSI report. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know I left a comment regarding a section I blanked out from the Casa Loma article in January over on the copyright violations page. Other than that section that I blanked, I couldn't find anything else that matched exactly, but then again, I was a bit distracted at the time by other things anyway. You might have more luck with it than I did.

Also, the infobox and opening statement should be unmarked, in my opinion. Even if anything in it were copied from elsewhere, it'd be fair use, and it'd be recreated if the infobox was ever added to the page in its rewrite. Likewise, the opening statement, as it'd be difficult, if not impossible, to rewrite it some other way. (BTW, the opening statement may be from http://www.galenfrysinger.com/ontario_toronto_casa_loma.htm but with a slight variation in translation; a Google search for the phrase pulled this up right after the WP article. Other text on that page sounds familiar, too.) --coldacid (talk|contrib) 05:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheHYPO. You have new messages at Coldacid's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

As suggested by the copyvio template, edits for the new article should be at Talk:Casa Loma/Temp until such time as we have a decent enough article to replace the original. --coldacid (talk|contrib) 09:59, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:OW1.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 21:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated ITunes Originals, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Originals. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Frasier1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ItunesOr.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_April_20, the original deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ITunes_Originals has been overturned and the articles restored for consideration at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/ITunes_Originals_(2nd_nomination).--Aervanath (talk) 13:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Shb1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 13:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheHYPO! Given you interest in working on Usain Bolt in the past: Would you like to join WikiProject Athletics? Thanks. Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits)^{WIKIPROJECT ATHLETICS NEEDS YOU!} 12:13, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as you opened this AFD - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Guests on Late Night with Conan O'Brien (2nd nomination)...

Just wanted to let you know about this latest Conan-related one: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien episodes Cheers, --Madchester (talk) 00:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheHYPO,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

• Each casebook will have a subpage.

• Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
• It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
• Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.

• I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.

2. If you're a law student,

• Email http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:Hornbook to your classmates, and tell them to do the same.
• Contact me directly via talk page or email about coordinating a chapter of "Student WP:Hornbook Editors" at your own school.

(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)

3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 02:16, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bonus round, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonus round. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sottolacqua (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When reintroducing material please be sure to check for accuracy, spelling and duplicate word errors. Sottolacqua (talk) 15:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Card Game (pricing game), Bullseye (active pricing game), Bonus Game, Bonkers (pricing game), Barker's Bargain Bar, Balance Game (2000s), Any Number, List of The Price Is Right pricing games. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Card Game (pricing game) for Card Game (pricing game), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullseye (active pricing game) for Bullseye (active pricing game), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonus Game for Bonus Game, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonkers (pricing game) for Bonkers (pricing game), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barker's Bargain Bar for Barker's Bargain Bar, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balance Game (2000s) for Balance Game (2000s), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Any Number for Any Number, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Price Is Right pricing games (2nd nomination) for List of The Price Is Right pricing games. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Check Game. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Check Game. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Kathy Greco, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Greco. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sottolacqua (talk) 14:21, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Roger Dobkowitz, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Dobkowitz. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sottolacqua (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saw you were editing Showcase Showdown but haven't commented on the Talk:The Price Is Right (U.S. game show)#Merge Discussions. Wanted to give you a chance to weigh in before merging the article. Sottolacqua (talk) 21:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Although it was several years ago now, you pulled what you considered trivial information off of the Hockey number section. But if you look at the history of numbers in the NHL the shift to numbers above 30 was a significant change in the tradition of the NHL and so describing how this happened with references is not any more trivial than talking about number of peoples jerseys in general. When I first read the article, it said that there was no basis for number selection in the NHL and that lower numbers were not more valued. This is untrue to this day. However it was very rare to see a number over 40 before the selection of higher numbers by Espo, Hodge, Gretzky. But you chose to delete this information. Well if that is the case, the only non trivial information is: "In hockey you can be any number between 1-98." Any more information is anecdotal. The point is, if you are going to slash articles with this information do it in a consistent manner instead of arbitrarily determining what is and isn't useful information.Kevinskogg (talk) 19:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not signing. After your edits, the full story of how Gretzky ended up with 99 was removed. And one of your edit comments said removing trivial items. I assumed that meant all of that set of edits. My original verbiage had been corrupted and needed to be cleaned up when you got there I agree, for example the parenthetical statement about the NHL retiring 99 like baseball did for 42 was out of place. But the point of that story was to show the direct link from Esposito's decision to Gatsby's number selection which, because of his eventual stature in the game, sped up the inclusion of non-hockey (as I call them) numbers in the game. Also, although it was not my inclusion, I think your comment about birth years is also wrong. My reasoning is this, Gordie Howe started in 1946-47 at the age of 18. He could have take his birth year 28 at that time but the Red Wings only numbered up to 22 and assigned numbers to players. Howe's original number of 17 was only changed the next year because it got him a lower berth on the Pullman car. It was typical in his era to be assigned numbers by the team. Considering that only one more birth year was available above the magic 30 and most number selection was done by the teams at this time, it falls that by the time individual numbers choices were common, only people born after 1930 were choosing so by the traditional "hockey number" system, birth years were not available. Therefore it wasn't really until recently that this became feasible under the hockey number "system," and for the writer to say this was a relatively new trend was correct.

Just an aside to this. When I was growing up my father was a high school running coach. One year, right before Espo went to the Rangers, his team bought extra warm up jerseys and my brother and I got our own with our HS graduation year on them. Boy did 1987 seem like a long way away. Being a little hockey fan I was disappointed by the number on the back. But then that winter Espo changed from 12 to 77 and I could now consider that it was a hockey number. I remember we had cable TV and at the time there weren't a lot of channels even on cable but one that we got was the MSG network. I remember watching the Rangers and want just to see this hockey jersey with such an outlandish number on it so I could pretend my #87 jersey was a hockey jersey (interesting now for me as the Pens are my #2 team.) There was no system, just like the "unwritten rules" of all sports, there was a protocol that people followed because that's the way it was. Turns out it was just because there were about 20 guys on a team and so you printed 20 jerseys with serial numbers and the first one was the goalie. Later as you had different rosters you added 10 more to cover everyone. And the first and last were goalies.Kevinskogg (talk) 20:22, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Add 'em Up, 3 Strikes (pricing game). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Add 'em Up for Add 'em Up, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3 Strikes (pricing game) for 3 Strikes (pricing game). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Check Game. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Check Game (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Triple Play (pricing game). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triple Play (pricing game). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My edit to the Barenaked Ladies article was fair. Scarborough was not merely a suburb of Toronto when Barenaked Ladies was formed, but still is. It's no longer a suburban municipality within Metro Toronto, but still a suburb. Why did you revert my edit? A.Roz (talk) 08:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(I've responded to this discussion on my talk page A.Roz (talk) 19:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]

[New response] A.Roz (talk) 05:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC) [New response] A.Roz (talk) 07:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is 1 Right Price. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 Right Price. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Eazy az 1 2 3. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eazy az 1 2 3. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hi Lo. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hi Lo. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bullseye (retired pricing game). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullseye (retired pricing game). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Cover Up (pricing game). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cover Up (pricing game). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Fortune Hunter, Hit Me, It's Optional. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fortune Hunter for Fortune Hunter, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hit Me for Hit Me, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/It's Optional for It's Optional. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Make Your Mark. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make Your Mark. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Double Prices. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double Prices. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TTD1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Quit Playin Games.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ebo1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:55, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hodges11.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:40, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article General average/New version is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General average/New version until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:24, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shapeofmyheartbsbsingle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cliff Hangers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Hangers (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 11:33, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Late night television in the United States has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Ryulong (竜龙) 03:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:TonyRan1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 05:39, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Stop Us If You've Heard This One Before, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Indie, Gordon and One Week (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:20, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grinning Streak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gavin Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WML1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Nickelodeon Guts page, your edit caused an empty citation error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mike Evin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheHYPO. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Peepshow tour has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable concert tour fails both WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR that has been incorrectly tagged as being sourced to primary references, because the only reference is an "Unofficial Peepshow song tracker" that now leads to a 404 website, for a year.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Aspects (talk) 02:14, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Late night television in the United States has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheHYPO. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheHYPO. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:KvS Scoreboard has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 04:23, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Detour de Force, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 03:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Detour de Force, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ItunesOr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LouisArmstrong PeterDavis1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TestPattern1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Joke's on Us has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:35, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]