Very nice start on the subject article -- I've linked back to it from the Raytheon article, and will try to add a bit more detail on the ALR-67(V)3 when I get a chance.

Would you have any objection to renaming (moving) the article to "ALR-67 Radar Warning Receiver"? This would make the title more descriptive in category listings. Engineer Bob 09:27, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to know why you decided to alter this Babelbox? I spent a good number of minutes trying to get to a unique colour scheme that worked and, if you don't mind me saying, I'm not really down with yr. new one. It was originally created for my userpage, where it was for quite a while, before I decided to post it on the list of userpage boxes, to share it with others of my persuassion, but as its creator, I take a certain degree of exception to it being altered stylistically. I know you stated that it was because it was hard to read in yr. edit summary, but I've seen on it several monitors - (both CRT and TFT) - and I gave this issue some brief thought when I was making the template, but after I checked it with my brightness setting on low, I figured it was fine. What I'm saying is that it was designed for my use and that I let others use it, provided they think it [in its intended original design] would look good on their own userpage.

Thanks for yr. time, Aaron ^(talk) 00:55 (GMT), 14 December 2005

Don't sweat it, I've altered it to something entirely new myself. If yr. okay with it, then I guess we're both happy.

I realised shortly afterwards that I'd taken yr. alteration I little too close to heart, but it had just happened at when of those moments when I was, at that exact point in time, annoyed with Wikipedia and it kind of felt like unintentional vandalism by proxy. I hope yr. cool with my own new version.

I guess you'll probably realised that when you do anything on Wikipedia, there's always two dozen eyes looking at your work, so make sure you consult/discuss and, of course, try to please the masses. That way you'll find less angry messages on yr. talk page.

Take care and hope you enjoy yr. Christmas, Aaron ^(talk) 21:15 (GMT), 18 December 2005

Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there! -- user:zanimum

Bonjour/bonsoir; comment allez-vous?

Engineering Wikia (formerly a wikicity) has only two engineers making serious contributions at present, and one of them is in his mid-80s. Your list of contributions there is still too short to need scrolling. Your thermometer here suggests that you're not too stressed yet - so how about looking in from time to time? (I can almost guarantee that nobody will give you any harsh criticism!)

Au revoir! Robin Patterson 11:59, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That source you posted wasn't reliable, so I changed it to a redirect. WhisperToMe (talk) 18:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Microconnect Distributed Antennas, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Microconnect Distributed Antennae. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:37, 23 June 2008 (UTC) The reason you got this "stupid bot [message]" was because you had created the new article with a copy&paste instead of a move. You have been contributing here for long enough to know better. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:57, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have granted rollback to your account. Please be sure to read WP:ROLLBACK thoroughly and be sure to use to tool to revert no more than simple vandalism, or the function will be removed accordingly. Happy editing to you. Keegan^talk 06:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. I see you've just been granted rollback and are choosing to use it to edit war over adding a category :-( Personally I'm not sure if we should have the article at all but it surely belongs in that category if we do. Theresa Knott | The otter sank

You are absolutely right. It should be deleted. Edit wars make you loose your focus... Germ (talk) 19:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that you have are great at creating infoboxes in SAM articles. Can you help fill in the infobx in 9K35 Strela-10?--EZ1234 (talk) 12:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done! --Ŧħę௹ɛя㎥ 02:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Hidden Page Barnstar
		I award you one for finding Trekphiler's page for people who always think that "new message" bar is real. Aren't you glad you checked your mail? TREKphiler hit me ♠ 20:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC) (BTW, what brought you to my page?)[reply]

Re , I think it got taken off Commons, but I haven't bothered to remove it. I still want 1, so I look occasionally. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 03:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Template Barnstar
		For your awesome and tireless efforts on the Template:Russian and Soviet missiles--EZ1234 (talk) 02:11, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dude! --Ŧħę௹ɛя㎥ 02:50, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, TheGerm. I noticed your signature just now and saw it had an image in it. According to our signature guideline, we ask that users not use images in their signatures for a large number of reasons - mainly that it has the risk of really slowing down the servers, and it also makes it difficult to track where the images are actually being used. Could I ask you to remove it, please? It's possible you might be able to replace it with a unicode character that looks similar. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to let me know. Thanks. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:47, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. I will change that!

for the last time: --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 02:49, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Et voila: --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 02:50, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a bunch. :-) Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have been asked by the 10 CMA's in Victoria to make thses pages. How do I indicated this so they are not deleted?

Also, I work for the State gov down here in Victoria and we are about to make a whole lot of pages on our Department (DSE) Wil i have similar issues and how do I work around them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Louiseann76 (talk • contribs) 03:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,

I now understand where you come from. The reason why I tagged the article was because of this sentence: "Our role as manager of the Barwon through Geelong in particular provides an excellent platform to engage with thousands of people in Victoria’s largest regional city." so I imagine you took the text from a website... which is not referenced (see WP:CITE for some help on referencing articles).

The other page you worked on - Corangamite - is not written appropriately, and I will therefore put a wikify tag. Thanks for your efforts and I will try to help tomorrow... (it's getting late in Canada!!!).

Thanks, --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 03:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will try to fix them while you sleep! (the CCMA page, I thought I had gotten rid of the OUrs and We's, I must have missed that one. They wrote the text for me) Louiseann76 (talk) 03:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck! --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 03:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. But we will need to fix the three articles as they talk a lot about each other. Same problem with SA-7,SA-14, SA-16, SA-18 and SA-24. --Ŧħę௹ɛя㎥ 03:14, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, so things look set to propose a merge for all of the Buk articles into "Buk missile system"?Typhoon9410 (talk) 11:59, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, before we forget and the articles get too complex... I will put the merge tags.--ŦħęGɛя㎥ 13:06, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting the vandal on my talk page! --ɔɹǝɐɯʎ!^Talk 12:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I place your tool box on my user page? I may be useful for me cheers--EZ1234 (talk) 07:30, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For sure, go ahead! I took it initially from Carom but he doesn't have it anymore... --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 20:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers--EZ1234 (talk) 08:22, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The anon continues to remove sourced content with no discussion on Talk. Perhaps we should ask for semi-protection? --Macrakis (talk) 14:50, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have just started the article a few minutes ago.--Bharatshah (talk) 00:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know about the company?

It is a major multinational trading company.

--Bharatshah (talk) 00:33, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look Bharatshah, if you beleive the article is worth being in Wikipedia, please explain why on the talk page. --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 00:37, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious, how did you decide so quickly that the article is not worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia?--Bharatshah (talk) 00:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G Premjee, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular. Please follow the links above for more details. Thanks, and have a good day! --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 01:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The consensus so far has been not to decorate AFV infoboxes with flag icons, as per WP:FLAGCRUFT#Help the reader rather than decorate. I notice you cite WP:WEAPON in your edit summaries, but I see nothing there but some examples without flags. —Michael Z. 2008-09-01 03:44 z

Good day Michael, your manual of style DOES recommand the use of a flag for the AFV infoboxes : "Flag icons may be appropriate as a visual navigational aid in tables, infoboxes or lists provided that citizenship, nationality or jurisdiction is intimately tied to the topic at hand, such as comparison of global economic data or reporting of international sporting event results, and cannot be expressed better with text. They should always be accompanied by their country names at least once."

In the case of the AFV infoboxes, the flag gives the reader a quick reference about the nationality (i.e. Soviet vs Russian, US vs Canadian, ect). Thanks, and have a great day! --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 13:31, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again. The guideline doesn't say “put flags in all infoboxes.”

You'll notice that the examples cited are lists of items, when the topic of the list is intimately tied to nationality. For example, adding flags to the lists of generals in battle boxes can show you at a glance e.g. that out of a couple dozen generals on one side, most were German, but a minority came from other countries. Decorating the name of a solitary country with a flag doesn't provide a “navigation aid ... which cannot be expressed better with text,” unless you count the absolutely illiterate as part of the article's target audience.

You'll also notice that the examples of infoboxes on the page don't have flags (or didn't, until you just added them—some editors might consider it somewhat graceless to change a guideline to fit your view and then cite it to support an argument).

This has been discussed numerous times, and meets with consensus. For example, lately at Template talk:Infobox Weapon#Flags. If you have a problem with it, please bring it up again there or at WT:MILHIST, and get some support to change the practice. Otherwise, please don't add flags to solitary country names. —Michael Z. 2008-09-01 14:00 z

Discussion posted on Template talk:Infobox Weapon#Flags, but I removed the "graceless" comment.

It looks as though you have reverted the article Helen Clark back to a state from several years ago. I presume this was an accident. If you really meant to remove so much material, perhaps you could explain on the talk page. If you didn't, please fix it, as the article is semi-protected.-118.93.41.78 (talk) 00:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! It was indeed an error! Please get an account (I hate talking to an IP address!!!). --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 00:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Sorry for the weirdness with me reverting myself twice. I hit cancel because I reverted something else right afterward that I didn't want to, and it undid my reversion on your talk page. Anyways, if you're getting vandalized, it is obvious you must be doing something really well, so keep it up! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 00:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the speedy tag because there is a weak assertion of notability. It does need sources though so it may have problems in AFD. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 01:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[[pl:Arcania: A Gothic Tale]]. Exactly :), Greets. Sir Lothar (talk) 23:40, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you fixed the link. Thanks! --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 01:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, sorry mate for my asking. Just thought if in EU countries is right I should change it :). Greets, mate :D Sir Lothar (talk) 22:23, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is this edit un-constructive. Even if you disagree with it, why would you template the IP? This seems to be a good faith editor who is just trying to improve Wikipedia. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 01:36, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oups! You are absolutely right! I fixed it. Sorry about that... --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 14:57, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha its ok. I thought maybe I was missing something. But yeah just make sure you be careful with some of those huggle edits. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 04:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice you CSD G4-ed WorkSessions, but there is no indication of where the duplicated content was from, and the delete log for that particular page is empty. As such, I have declined speedy deletion, but if you can point me to where it originally was (or if I'm missing something really obvious), I'll be happy to reverse myself. Also, the notability of the company is pretty shaky anyway, I'm pretty sure that there would be a delete consensus if it were to go to AfD. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Good day Lankiveil.

Sorry, my mistake... I tagged it {{db-g4}} where it should obviously have been {{db-inc}}!!!

The background info on this young (2008) and relatively un-notable (3 employees) company can be found here and here, which makes it a pretty easy case... --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 14:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did I do something wrong..? Bsimmons666 (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all! I noticed that you started an article, referencing it well, and I just wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia! Have a good day! --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 15:36, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whew lol. You too. Bsimmons666 (talk) 15:43, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just a friendly note: please review WP:Patent nonsense carefully before tagging any more articles with {{g1}}. Patent nonsense is gibberish, or nonsensical pseudo-sentences, not stories, vandalism, or hoaxes. Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 02:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. Thanks, --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 02:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another note: albums are not valid candidates for speedy deletion; only their artists/producers/etc. This is in reference to your note to User:Buffbloom. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 02:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, point taken. It will be a straight {{db-a7}} next time. Thanks, --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 01:00, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the reason for deleting my page "kenriche". Thanks

--Kenriche (talk) 22:52, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You welcome. I understand your initial reaction, I'm glad I was able to split the article. I added more information and an image (I got permission to use the Logo image from the University System of Georgia personally). Please let me know if there's any other ways I can fix/expand the new article. I'm almost "intermediate" with my Wikipedia editing skills. This was my first "split". I've been working on the Student Advisory Council of Georgia article almost every day, fine-tuning it for various reasons. Thank you for your help!  :-) Sirkevinalot (talk) 22:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheGerm. I undid your removal of HPV type 63 from Plantar warts because this information is backed by Human Papillomavirus at eMedicine. Although types 1, 2, and 4 are most common, type 63 also seems to cause them. —{admin} Pathoschild 12:10:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Just a quick edit to say thanks for the Chevrons, I appreciate it! Im planning to keep going over the SAM articles as I get time in the coming weeks, the Buk article has been the hardest to date due to the volume of designations and details. Thanks also for your help in getting these articles in the right direction! RegardsTyphoon9410 (talk) 23:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Hi! There was one person who made this change:revision 268338333 by MARK S. (talk) That I am trying to revert, but I don't want to screw it up more than it is... The real history is already located in S-75 Dvina... Thanks, --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 04:38, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with :revision 268340745 by MARK S. (talk)

Thanks, --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 04:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure I understand your questions. Did those revisions introduce something that you want to change? What is the problem with those edits that you are trying to fix? I'm having trouble getting diffs to look at. Do you think that you could include links to them here, instead of just revision numbers. Thanks.—C45207 | Talk 04:54, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry.

SA-2 Guideline should be S-75 Dvina

SA-21 Growler should be S-400 (missile)

All I am worry about is to move the history and discussion with the article. Thanks, --ŦħęGɛя㎥ 04:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly by naming convention says that those should be the names? I'm not arguing, I'm just asking so I can look into how to properly style the title of the article. Keegan (talk) 05:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After figuring out the correct name for the page, you can rename is by moving it to a new name. See Help:Moving a page for helping on renaming a page. When you move a page, its history goes with it. You may want to consider adding redirects too for other names that should take the user to the same page, even if you don't end up renaming the original pages.—C45207 | Talk 05:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma Brewery#Copyright violation -- PBS (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask your GAReview for Arrow (missile)? Flayer (talk)

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:22, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:43, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:06, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:45, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TheGerm,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ^{☎ call me!}

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec)

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:50, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LII (June 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Occupation Infobox style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 15:29, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies ^talk 19:43, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010) Front page Project news Articles Members Editorial

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:05, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:26, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:52, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:52, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:52, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 00:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:16, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

Hello, TheGerm. You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:28, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview: Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign Op-ed: Remembering conflict

Hi fellow editor, You are invited to join the WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort focused on improving Wikipedia's coverage of electrical engineering. If you'd like to join, add also your name to the member list. Thanks for reading! SchreyP (messages) 19:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion Interview: Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the legacy of World War II Op-ed: Bomzibar on German military history

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire Op-ed: Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 16:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

• tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
• updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
• creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:35, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]