I see that you've removed the prose saying that Skyfall grosses over $780 million world-world wide. I'd like to convince you a bit that we should keep it. Since a good article like Prometheus (film), and a featured one like Casino Royal (film) both have this part. And because the number in the prose is an estimate (it says 'over' this or that figure) we won't have to tediously update it as you fear. I hope this convinces you. Hope your OK with this? Anthonydraco (talk) 21:04, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice that there has been on-going reversions of categories of the Skyfall article over the last couple of weeks. Before you make any changes to the disputed category, could you and the other editor involved slug it out in the article talk page please? If nothing else the wider community will be able to see your individual rationales and may be able to help provide a way forward. Many thanks - SchroCat (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Trance 2013 UK quad poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The Clown90,

I would like to request that you un-delete information about the nonprofit organization that I work for - Build It Green!NYC, which I tried to add to Wikipedia today. I think that our nonprofit organization should be included on this site because we are working to reduce the unnecessary amount of waste headed to the landfill, and offering free/low-cost services (such as free pick-ups, free or low-cost deconstruction services) to help make this process easier for New Yorkers. We are a non-governmental, nonprofit organization, similar to Habitat for Humanity's Re-Stores (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitat_for_Humanity).

Please let me know what type of information I should add or remove to our listing, to make it seem less like a "promotion" as you defined our page. I am new to adding content to Wikipedia, but have referenced this source many times over the years.

As a side note - Our parent nonprofit, Community Environmental Center, is listed on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_Environmental_Center) as well as our sister nonprofit organization Solar One (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_1).

Thanks for your time and consideration.

Best, Jaclyn JaclynBIGNYC (talk) 22:41, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged Revolutionary in india for speedy deletion. I don't think it was an article. It was a new user asking (in the wrong space) for an article on that topic to be created. I left the following message for the user, which I hope her or she will find useful: :There are several categories that you should look at, including Category:Indian reformers, Category:Indian prisoners and detainees and Category:Indian people by political orientation." If I hadn't been able to find these categories, I would have posted a note at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics with the user's request for the article, and added the title to Wikipedia:Requested articles Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TheClown90, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gibensu, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A1 is for very short articles, not ones in foreign languages. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 22:26, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out to be an album by someone with an article. I've declined the speedy, but it could do with a ref or two. I've messaged the author, who might appreciate a bit of help. (Might not...) Peridon (talk) 20:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Sorry about that, I'm used to tagging a significant amount of articles with people trying to promote their own band. TheClown90 (talk) 21:03, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:I Give It a Year UK Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Surreal Barnstar
	Had to do this… couldn’t resist it. You’ve done a magnificent job on the time you’ve spent editing and protecting Wikipedia. I hope and pray you succeed greatly in your life. Surge_Elec (talk) 22:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]