Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

Userboxes This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 20:54, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is poor etiquete to revert an edit which was not vandilisation without an explaination. The dates I added were correct. Dorkinglad (talk) 16:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)an[reply]

The dates had nothing to do with the tournament and were therefor misleading. Tewapack (talk) 16:24, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. keep on truckin'. Next time an explanation. It's courtesy. Dorkinglad (talk) 12:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

His age was showing up as 56 yesterday, on his birthday, until I changed the birth month from 4 to 04. Maybe that was just a coincidence? It was the afternoon, so it wasn't a time zone issue. The birth date and age template seems broken. Kstern (talk) 11:34, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a source anywhere to suggest that his name is spelt Peña and not Pena? Have had a quick look and found nothing. Jimmymci234 (talk) 14:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jimmymci234: Peña was certainly used in many newspapers during the 1990s, e.g. [1]. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 19:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wjemather: Thanks, will go with that then. Jimmymci234 (talk) 19:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know it doesn't really matter, but is there any difference in using these codes for flagicons, or is it just purely based on preference? Jimmymci234 (talk) 18:28, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using DEU requires 1 less template load than GER. As you said, doesn't really matter. Tewapack (talk) 18:30, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the mess. Tried to correct without being aware of your correction. EEJB EEJB (talk) 21:27, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was just wondering why the cat sorts were reverted. I don't doubt you have a good reason for doing it, but it would be helpful to know why it was done, for future reference. Thanks! Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 17:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think it makes more sense to sort by year for these types of events (non-annual, or no pattern). Tewapack (talk) 20:16, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is sense to doing it that way, I agree. But I think in this case where we're collecting different kinds of events that happened in a city, sorting by year jumbles them in terms of the name/kind of event and may make it harder for the reader to find what they're looking for (in principle at least). That's why I was trying to sort by event name, with year as a secondary sort. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 20:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for not following what I see now is pretty common/the norm for golfers in terms of sections dealing with wins and thanks for reverting it. (Not sure why I hadn't noticed it before.) Is there a good thread/page that talks about the suggested layout for golfers? Thanks! Skynxnex (talk) 21:18, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately no. The style has evolved (and continues to evolve) over time. Tewapack (talk) 22:54, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know where to place my message, so I am using this section. Thank you for improving the article "Kokona Sakurai" that I wrote. I appreciate it very much. However, please do not change the date format. Since she will be participating in at least the Women's US Open this year, hopefully, also the Women's PGA Championship, and she plans to become an LPGA member next year, I would prefer the American-style date format. Thank you in advance. Pantherat2 (talk) 09:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For non-US and non-Canadian related articles,the day-month-year date format should be used per MOS:DATETIES. I'll revert the article to use mdy dates.Tewapack (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As for your revision of Aug. 15, I understand that it was done with the purpose of trimming the contents down. However, from a precise point of view, Kokona was given the invitation to the AIG Open actually ranked 74th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pantherat2 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tewapack,

Please review Wikipedia:Rollback, especially the section that states Editors who misuse MediaWiki rollback (for example, by using it to make unexplained reversions of good-faith edits in situations where an explanatory edit summary would normally be expected) may have their rollback rights removed. Do not use rollback to revert edits of longtime editors making good faith edits without leaving an explanation as you did when you emptied Category:Italian expatriate golfers in the United States out of process. If you persist in misusing this editing feature, you may have your privileges removed. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!}

Yeap, I boo-booed on Chris Kirk, forgetting it was a golf-related article before saving. I'll try to pay better attention to these instances. Cheers! Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 22:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 in sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springfield, New Jersey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You rolled back a recent edit I'd made to Ken Venturi's page. The sentence in question was: Venturi spent the next 35 years working as a color commentator and lead analyst for CBS Sports, the longest lead analyst stint in sports broadcasting history, made remarkable by the fact that he had a stutter. I added "even more" before "remarkable," and you changed it back. I wanted to not a couple of things: First, the saying is "even more remarkable," but aside from that, his stutter isn't what made his feat remarkable. His feat of being a the longest-serving color analyst in the sports broadcasting history was remarkable in its own right. It was made more so by the fact that he had a stutter. Jmg999 (talk) 20:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you reverted my edits to the Multiple winners section for the U.S. Amateur several times. Earlier this year I brought this up on the main talk page but no one responded. I then corresponded with User:Jimmymci234 about this as he works on a lot of tournament stuff. We came to the consensus that this section was extraneous as the amount of wins is already denoted in parentheses in the Winner column. What are your thoughts?

Regards,

Oogglywoogly (talk) 22:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because it contains different info than other "Multiple winners" sections, info that isn't already in the winners section. Tewapack (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

True but it still feels like trivia. I still feel like we should get rid of it.

Oogglywoogly (talk) 03:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)Oogglywoogly[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golf at the 2024 Summer Olympics – Qualification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Scott.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am almost done with formatting for the 1919 U.S. Open and 1928 U.S. Amateur. However, I have a couple of little issues with citations in the infobox. For the 1919 event, I am using the same citation for The Brooklyn Daily Eagle in the infobox but when I publish it always denotes the source as two separate citations (#1 and #2). Do you know how to fix this?

In addition, there is a source for the infobox for the 1928 U.S. Amateur that is used in the text. It is The Springfield Daily Republican article here. It is currently citation #1 and #4. But they should be the same. If you could fix these or teach me how to fix these that would be great.

Regards,

Oogglywoogly (talk) 00:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. My guess, based on this and other questions you've had, is that you are using the visual editor which I don't use and am not familiar with. I use the wiki markup source editor - see Help:Introduction. Tewapack (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ben Griffin (golfer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tewapack! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Griffin (golfer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 21:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A couple months ago, when I prepared a "List of" page and hid the entry for the future winner, an editor came along and reversed it, saying that it goes against the rules to hide that entry. That is why I did not hide the one that I put on the "List of Women's British Open champions" page. Now it will be something to see if that same editor comes along and reverses it now that it has been hidden. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 09:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing to inquire to why was the edit made 16:47, 27 August 2024‎ in regards to how he was the designer of the course was deleted. As it could be found around San Diego and Chula Vista that he was. I provide a source from the golf course that illustrates his conurbation. If my the problem was in regards to my placement of the text or my reference what was the main issue? Thank you. Issac I Navarro (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also I don't know if this dose help however some information could be found "Chula Vista Golf Course and its restaurant, the Glenn. The shopping center where Vons now sits was an open field, so on to the Sunnyside Store at the east end of town. After several meetings, the group named itself and elected the officers for the first time. Dr. Bob Fouchet was elected the first president. Emily was the vice president, Dede Shields, secretary. ( Chula Vista Historical Society. Family, Friends, and Homes,1991. ) Billy Casper with Lorraine Whittington and Emily Ritter preparing for a golf tournament to benefit the Community Hospital in 1973. Emily Ritter was president of the hospital auxiliary in Chula Vista and founder of the BBPA in Bonita. (Photo from Community Hospital)" Issac I Navarro (talk) 20:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a copyright violation from https://chulavistagc.com/course-details/ Tewapack (talk) 20:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. However it dose seem that was the designer of the course, how may it be added without it being in copyright violation? I did add an URL linking it to the website, was that not enough with edits from what was said with a unbiased perspective? Issac I Navarro (talk) 20:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FedEx Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Scott.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Esther Henseleit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrea Lee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Max Greyserman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that PGA Tour golfer Max Greyserman and his brother Reed are the first brothers to win the New Jersey Amateur Championship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Max Greyserman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Max Greyserman), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 LPGA Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hannah Green.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]