/Archive1

Hi! Could you please spell for me "Vangelia" in Greek? --Cameltrader 10:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...and confirm whether it really means Herald of the Blessed Word as claimed in baba Vanga. --Cameltrader 10:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I hope I don't get annoying, but I need another one: Pristis, supposed to mean harbour or something. It is part of Sexaginta Prista, an ancient name of Rousse, Bulgaria (the first word means "sixty" in Latin). There's a similar Bulgarian word pristanishte — harbour, which gives me hope to find the root. I tried some online dictionaries listed at the article about Greek language, and I got περιθάλπω (maybe modern Greek?), which looks vaguely similar only in the first few letters. I can't figure out the original combinations of iod/eta and accents. --Cameltrader 13:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahah, I like it! I just love the way "one can easily see" where the Macedonians make up the majority of the population, and that there aren't national minoroties in Greece simply because "every country in Europe has national minorities". Of course, it's needless to say there are no Albanians in the Republic, not at all :)

Thanks for the interwiki and the name in Greek! Todor→Bozhinov 11:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Telex, as you have some practice creating picture galleries: would you like to make a new one for the Arvanites, using perhaps Image:Melina Mercouri.JPG, Image:Bouboulina.JPG, Image:MarkosBotsaris.jpg, Image:Nikos Engonopoulos.jpg, and/or one of the four uniformed politicians? I'm quite proud I actually got GFDL permission for the Melina picture, we didn't have any good photograph of her anywhere on WP. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:41, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a few days - I have limited internet access at the moment. --Telex 13:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As for Arbereshe/Arberore, I see we currently have only the one version, but apparently both are attested. Feel free to insert whatever you think is linguistically authentic. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, do you think we should move the Arvanitic language article to Arvanitika? There seem to have been wild move wars about that, some time back in the Bronze Age or so, but my impression is those disputes are pretty much obsolete now. "Arvanitika" seems to be more common in the literature, and it is also neutral with respect to the underlying separate-language dispute that was so hotly debated back then. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:27, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you ask what license this image is under? I'd like to be sure that it is GFDL before uploading it to Wikimedia Commons. Jkelly 01:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hm. I mean the panoramic view found at el:Θεσσαλονίκη. Jkelly 02:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, you added something about the non-mutual intelligibility of Greek Slavic dialects and standard Macedonian. I removed it as I couldn't find the citation in the link provided. If I've missed it, can you point it out on the talk page. Thanks. - FrancisTyers · 15:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gyrisa :-(. Esy? :NikoSilver: 20:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Γεια σου Τέλεξ:). Όλα καλά... Καλώς επέστρεψες και, όπως είπε και ο Νικόλας, "Καλό χειμώνα!". --Hectorian 14:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ΟΟΟΟΟχχχχιιιι! Μη μου λέτε για χειμώνα, σάς παρακαλώωω. Ρε Άυγουστο έχουμε ακόμα, εγώ δε χόρτασα καλοκαίρι! :-(( Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Καλά τότε.... "Καλό φθινόπωρο";). --Hectorian 14:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mpou-xou-xou-xou :-( :NikoSilver: 14:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha... Gia sena to traviksan poly makria! Osa exoun sxesi me tous vlaxous, ta eixa dei kai tote, mias kai prosexo ta arthra afta. Xero vlahika, alla eilikrina, den einai to idio me to na diavazeis roumanika (oti ki an lene:p). kai mono me ta latinika mou, tha katalavaina to noima, outws h allws:). Exo tin entuposi oti pagidevontai sta logia tous, kai otan den mporoun na peisoun tous allous, apla tous katigoroun... Isos pali na zilevoun... What should i say for Baristarim? it is not my fault that Churchil, Einstein, Hugo, etc said those things! i just editted them! Perhaps, i am nationalist cause i chose to use them, and all of them are greek nationalists as well for having said such things:ppp. Pao stoixima pos an den eixa fotografia tis agias sofias, tha eixe vgalei to skasmo! ton etsouxe, alla den me noiazei...:) --Hectorian 21:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you looked at the current state of the the article Armenian-Turkish_relations?? and pls also have a look at its talk page talk:Armenian-Turkish_relations... I rewrote it and enriched it, and there is also a comment by the guy who created the article user:Fedayee who confirmed that it was nice editing.. This deletion that u mentioned ONLY took place because I am new to Wikipedia and I didn't have much experience on how editing works.. The current state of the article CLEARLY shows this, that part of the article is still there and it has much more clarity... I have also copy-edited the PKK article from TOP to BOTTOM, something nobody was willing to do for AGES, if you have any evidence of bias there, pls feel free to change it... Pls stop trolling.. I have lived in Turkey, the US and France (still there) during my life, I went to schools that 99 percent of the people of this world doesn't have the luck to go and I speak three languages fluently, the Hagia Sophia picture definitely DIDN'T piss me off, in fact I see it as a good evidence of how intertwined Turkish and Greek cultures are, and as such, a wealth to be cherished, when I saw the picture, that's not at all what I was thinking, that kind of animosity belongs in the past... ANYONE, Turkish, Greek, French, Russian etc. that puts so many quotes about the greatness of his country is a nationalist, if you can point me to a Turk that has so many quotes on his page, I give you my WORD that I will write on his page exactly what I just wrote. I have not claimed to be the unique (or any) example of democracy and never will... And please let's not skirt the issue, being democratic doesn't mean blindly accepting every political claim of grievance put forward for the sake of political correctness.. You have still not been able to anwser my posts in the talk page... If, for one reason or the other, you got some beef with the Young Turks, pls keep it to yourself UNLESS you got the proof to back it up.. I have not even mentioned or defended, or attacked the Young Turks in any of my postings, where did this come from???? I most probably know about the atrocities that the Young Turks have committed or influenced much more than you do, I have made extensive research on European legal history, as I said I am an international lawyer, I have read hundreds of thousands of pages concerning history, law and philosophy to this day. As i said, again, you don't know me, you don't know what i do in life and you don't know what experiences I had in life to this point.. If you are assuming that all Turks are chauvinistic nationalists, than u r wrong and that's not cool; if u don't however, pls act accordingly.. What I am saying is, however, that allegations have to be substantiated... But, I am definitely someone to lay down and give people free reign to settle old scores on the other hand, FYI.. If there is enough PROOF of anything, I WILL believe it.. I am an atheist and I believe that the only valid form of proof is the scientific one, and as such, claims have to be proven using the Scientific Method.. Why don't u spend your time trying to answer my posts rather than engaging in ad hominim attacks?? Regards.. Baristarim 23:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, as for the quotes, I have said nothing about them or their authors, I don't think that they are Greek nationalists nor do I think that the content of the quotes are incorrect, quite the contrary actually... I repeat again, I don't think that this issue is a who-is-better issue, it only gives me pleasure that such rich cultures have existed and continue to exist in our planet.. What I am SAYING, however, is the EXCESSIVE USE of such quotes by ANYONE about their country would be nationalistic behaviour, that's all. Pls don't try to portray me as a Greek-hater (culturally or individually) Baristarim 23:49, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...you know the drill! :-) •NikoSilver• 10:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't create any more please. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:09, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Note: I'm neither Greek nor Turkish, nor do I have any knowledge whatsoever about the alleged incidents. I do, however, have an opinion on the title of Pontian Greek Genocide. I read through the talk page, and there was one suggestion that was mentioned that seemed to be overlooked by all parties: "Pontian Greek Genocide Thesis". The word "thesis" is extremely neutral. I've added my points to the most recent discussion there, but bear in mind that I won't discuss the issue any further on that page. Please, however, feel free to discuss on my talk page. --Storkk 12:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, usually Bonny changes the numbers to be in the 30s. Jeorjika might be a Constantzeanu sock, I would reccomend a CheckUser. —Khoikhoi 18:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed a suspected sock puppet template on your userpage, due to your edit to Republic_of_Macedonia. This doesn't mean you're banned or anything, but the similarities with aldux are too close to be ignored, so I have put it up just to be safe. If a long period of time passes without any trouble, I'll remove it. AIUI 14:01, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not edit my user page. Many people have considered me a sockpuppet of Aldux, of Hectorian, of NikoSilver etc in the past, and the admins able to verify the validity of these allegations (see WP:RCU) have always dismissed the requests. If you want, feel free to make another RCU, just don't edit my user page. --Telex 14:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How admins are able to verify the validity of these allegations? AIUI 15:12, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By looking at my and Aldux's IP addresses. If we can be traced to different countries (and that's what will happen), then we are assumed not to be sockpuppets. --Telex 15:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding {{totallydisputed}}, are you sure it includes {{unreferenced}}? I always thought it just was used as a combination between {{POV}} and {{disputed}}... BTW, do you remember what you said to Pecher a long time ago? "It doesn't hurt to assume good faith once in a while." :-/

About the link you showed me, how often do you read their articles? :-) Regardless of the source, it is interesting nonetheless, and I agree—it is nice. I wonder how many countries recognize the Assyrian genocide, the article doesn't have a section about that. My friend Chaldean wrote most of the article, perhaps he knows. —Khoikhoi 08:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, the article does state that it is not recognized by any country in the world. —Khoikhoi 08:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) Regarding the terms Assyrian, Syriac, and Chaldean...I think Χαλδαίος would give you a better answer. What I now is that the term Assyrian is what most of the non-Arab, non-Turk, non-Kurd Christians from the Middle East describe themselves as. "Chaldean" refers to ethnic Assyrians that belong to the Chaldean Catholic Church. Syriac is a term used to coin all Semitic and ethnically non-Arab Christians of the Middle East—so I guess they include Arameans as well. It's a confusing subject, I hope I didn't make matters more complicated. According to the 2nd paragraph of the Assyrian genocide, there are many people that do not wish to use the ethnic ethnic identifier Assyrian. But different people will tell you different things. —Khoikhoi 20:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that currently it has the status of 'treaty language' -- e.g. treaties are published in Irish. In 2007 it will become fully official. I may be wrong though... - FrancisTyers · 13:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ανέλαβα την πρωτοβουλία για τη δημιουργία του ως άνω project! Στη σελίδα διαλόγου του project (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History of Greece) θα δεις τις προτάσεις μου και τις σχέσεις μου για το μέλλον. Άλλωστε, ελπίζω ότι από τη στιγμή της δημιουργίας του το project θα φύγει από τα χέρια του και θα αγκαλιαστεί και από όλους χρήστες, που θα του προσφέρουν τη δική τους δυναμική. Αυτός είναι ο στόχος μου. Να μη μείνει ένα μνημειακό δείγμα χωρίς ζωή.
Εχω διαπιστώσει το ενδιαφέρον σου για την ιστορία και σκέφτηκα ότι μπορεί να ενδιαφέρεσαι να συμμετάσχεις και να συνεισφέρεις. Οποιαδήποτε συνεισφορά, οπώς και η ενημέρωση άλλων χρηστών για το project ή προτάσεις σχετικά με το lay-out και τη δομή του project είναι άκρως επιθυμητές. Προσδοκώ στη βοήθειά σου, όποτε θα σου είναι δυνατό.
Χαιρετίσματα!--Yannismarou 16:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your greek seems very robotic. Are you using a translator such as SysTran, maybe? Χαιρετίσματα! ΚρύψουΣεΨάχνουνε

Όταν το κεφάλι σου έχει γίνει ναααααααα και γράφεις ακατάπαυστα για 3 ώρες, συμβαίνει και αυτό καμιά φορά. Επί της ουσίας, όμως, δε βλέπω απάντηση! ΜεΒρήκανε;

Ναι, ρε συ. Και και να το είχες γράψει χιουμοριστικά το πήρα. Δεν είναι θέμα. Ευχαριστώ!--Yannismarou 08:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it's a great article idea, I'd be happy to work on it :) As for history, Aldux's suggestion to start from 1878 is nice, although the Bulgarians and the Greeks as peoples have had contacts since the Early Middle Ages, and I wouldn't object on beginning from that period either. There is already an article about the the Byzantine-Bulgarian Wars, we can integrate it in some way in Byzantine-Bulgarian relations or Greco-Bulgarian relations. Todor→Bozhinov 13:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find this a good idea as well! however, with all respect to Aldux, i do not think that we should we should start from 1878. because we are not talking only about the modern states. this way we should create a separate article named Byzantine Empire-First Bulgarian Kingdom relations and so on. There could be some reference to the Byzantine and early Middle Ages periods, and then, in a 'See also' section, we may add Byzantine-Bulgarian Wars. --Hectorian 14:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ki egw tous lypame... kai aftous kai tous eks-anatolwn... alla, aftoi prepei na apodeiksoun oti aksizoun na mpoun, me ta kritiria pou isxuoun, oxi me afta pou theloun... Kati akousa oti eipe i Dora gia Accession of the Republic of Macedonia to the European Union, alla den vrika kapoio link sto diktyo:). xairomai gia tous Vulgarous! an mas elegan prin 15 xronia oti tha ta pame toso kala mazi tous, mallon tha skagame sta gelia...! Hectorian 13:54, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

e? ti crap einai afto? maybe i should shout: shit on my face!!! to vriskw dyskolo na pistepsw oti yparxoun anthrwpoi pou mporoun na pistepsoun oles aftes tis m....ies! Toulaxiston den leei oti kai o Xpictoc itan Skopianos...:p Hectorian 14:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re paidia, poly plaka exete! Telex, exeis idea gia ton an oi Albanoi ths FYROM kai ths mala Prespa & Golo Bardo, aytoxarakthrizontai ws Makedones? 8elw na alla3w (pali) to intro sto terminology, alla oxi 2 fores (mia gia na pw "4 groups, 3 of which self-id" kai meta allh mia gia na pw "4 groups, all of which self-id"...•NikoSilver• 14:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ap' oti xero, i Alvani ton Prespon dhen aftoharaktirizonde os Makedhones. Ute i Ellines tis Alvanias (Koritsas-Pogradhets) aftoharaktirizonde os Makedhones alla os Ipirotes. Ap' oti xero, mono i Alvani tis FYROM spania, ke merikes fores mono aftoharaktirizonde os Makedhones opos i Alvani tu Kosyfopedhiu aftoharaktirizonde os Kosovarë. Tha psakso ya piyes omos... --Telex 14:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Eyxaristw. Pali kala pou ta milas esy... •NikoSilver• 15:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Den pas na gineis melos sto Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Greece#Members? •NikoSilver• 22:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My latest activities are nothing more or less than my standard wikipedia activities. :) I am not considering standing any elections at all. As much as I'm flattered by Thy proposal, I am determined to decline (if you are refering to adminship) - not time for such a burden yet! :)

By the way, where do you live, if I may know? Your neutrality and anti-nationalism has made it almost appearent that live in the world :) however, your physical being must be somehwere! --HolyRomanEmperor 14:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, T. Nice to hear from you again. ;-) So tell me, how are you doin'? Bomac 22:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Добро - фала :-) --Telex 22:32, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well then, read you later. :-) Bomac 22:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt Sargonious is going to accept it, however. :( —Khoikhoi 22:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He can't expect nineveh.com to be a serious source on what and who people are. All that sources is the self-identification of the community (e.g. the community claims to be XYZ). It doesn't source what he is saying. Anyway, the exact quote from Britannica is The most numerous of these [ethnic minorities] (more than one-fifth of the population) are the Albanians, who claim to be descendants of the ancient Illyrians. They are concentrated in the northwest, along the borders with Albania and the predominantly Albanian province of Kosovo in Serbia., so don't have any doubts, this is encyclopedic style. --Telex 22:32, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. What does Britannica say about the Greeks being descendants from the ancient ones? —Khoikhoi 22:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I've been talking with an Aromanian editor here. What part of meta do you think he should go to? —Khoikhoi 22:56, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Britannica doesn't really address the issue of modern vs ancient Greeks, although at their article on Greece it does say: Greece lies at the juncture of Europe, Asia, and Africa. It is heir to the heritages of classical Greece, the Byzantine Empire, and nearly four centuries of Ottoman rule.

• To change the Aromanian interwiki label, you should ask a m:Developers. I think User:Brion VIBBER would be happy to help. Oops, I spoke too late: m:User talk:Jon Harald Søby#Aromanian translation. --Telex 23:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Telex, article related "Genocide of Pontian Greeks" was reverted by you. This a fictious matter created by Greeks. please condider;is it possible to edit an article " Telex is liar" and marked it with "POV" mark. Till to deleting this article will read about "Liar Telex". It is not logical. Lets delete this matter till to findin any proof about it. Regards Mustafa Akalp

Time for a Barnstar, sonny! :) --HolyRomanEmperor 17:54, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you made a revert just now and have not made any comment on the talk page? There is an etiquette.Kaz 10:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't receive any. Could you send it again? Jayjg ^(talk) 14:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Telex, I would highly appreciate if you don't push the Serb POV in the Kosovo article. I can understand your nationalist point of view when it comes to Arvanites and other Albanian-Greek related issues, but I don't understand why you have to 'defend' the Serbs? Greek policy is shifting towards Kosovo and I would appreciate if you actually support the neutral point of view (the UNMIK position) until the status is decided, which will be independence. I have great respect for ancient greek literature... Albanians and Greeks have too much in common, for the latter to fall for Serb propaganda. I don't understand why?

Why have you asked to be indefinitely blocked? Everything OK? (I hope)--Asterion^talk 19:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly check Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Aspasia.--Yannismarou 10:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No - you're a rare worthy asset to the Wikipedia project. I was thinking of nominating you for an administrator - don't abandon us now! P. S. What do you think about the future of Kosovo/a? HolyRomanEmperor 19:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Θα ήθελα να μου πεις πού έμαθες μακεδονικά ρε εσύ; :) Βλέπω πως καταλαβαίνεις τα μακεδονικά καλά, παρόλο και δεν τα γράφεις τόσο καλά (που δεν σημαίνει πως δεν μπορείς να βελθιωθείς  ;) και δεν σημαίνει πως εγώ είμαι καλύτερος στα Ελληνικά ) Μου αρέσουν Έλληνες που μιλάνε την μητρική μου γλώσσα... φιλικοί χαιρετισμοί Guitardemon666 15:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This may interest you. --Pan Gerwazy 20:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YES YES I confirm it's me. Bug off now, you should assume good faith and not assume that everyone is trying to cheat (not as if my one vote would make much of a difference). This account is blocked so that I can move to another account without being accused of sockpuppetry. See how honest I am?--Telex 21:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article User:Telex/Serbian Greek Empire, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:User:Telex/Serbian Greek Empire|its talk page]]. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Calton | Talk 23:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Telex. If you're still watching this page, would you mind checking image:Palaeologus-flag.png and adding a source for this image? Thanks. Valentinian ^{T / C} 12:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MacSlavs.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 21:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Greeks.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 17:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IrredentistGreeceAlbania.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 17:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:GreeksTop50Countries.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 18:30, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Palaeologus-emblem.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Valentinian ^{T / C} 19:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you support this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Akrotiri_and_Dhekelia#Proposed_change_of_name_for_article

We are trying to make the article more reality based and less ambiguous. Reaper7 (talk) 03:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Prespa e Vogël and Golloborda. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prespa e Vogël and Golloborda. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment here. Thanks. georgianJORJADZE 18:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Abecedar.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Telex,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Willbb234 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Greek Helsinki Monitor, for deletion, because it's impossible to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 10:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Milošević and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 12#Milošević until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 14:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]