Since you deleted my page I was wondering where do I write a biography at then?

Sorry (Dnl.briseno (talk) 23:11, 11 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

This is a confirmation edit for WP:ACC. Tek022 | _Comments? 07:08, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding User talk:Xuzhimol, what are your criteria for Good article!? The page was a copyvio and blatant promotion. Vsmith (talk) 11:51, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I created three links to DGS. Thank you, greetings --Jean11 (talk) 17:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, re this revert: the anon was quite correct, see

• Conolly, W. Philip (1976). British Railways Pre-Grouping Atlas and Gazetteer (5th ed.). Shepperton: Ian Allan. p. 36, section B4. ISBN 0-7110-0320-3. EX/0176. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

the order of the stations, from south to north, is Invergordon - Delny - Kildary - Nigg - Fearn - Tain - Edderton - Bonar Bridge - Culrain. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, thanks for the information. My main suspicion was the red link to Nigg. Tek022 | _Comments? 18:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tek022, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and  Tentinator  06:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. INeverCry (talk) 17:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to walk away from this issue, as all I wanted to insure was an accurate reference, maintain a higher standard than TMZ.com or its friend The Hollywood Reporter. But now I am being threatened by Coffeepusher, whom I really don't care to engage. =//= Johnny Squeaky 22:08, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's perfectly fine, the talk page has just moved downhill. In all honesty, you have 3 reverts on the history, Coffeepusher has 1. But, if you are so inclined, you can to bring it up to the Administrators' noticeboard. Tek022 | _Comments? 23:05, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I declined the speedy on Brad Hatch. I don't think he's ultimately notable enough to merit an article apart from Fairfax Media, but he is mentioned in at least one of the sources- enough to assert some notability. Enough to where he wouldn't be a clean speedy. My recommendation is to either AfD him or just redirect him to Fairfax Media and merge some of the info in. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently he has played soccer in a fully professional league, or at least that's what the articles says. Please feel to take to WP:AfD if you want to. Pete aka --Shirt58 (talk) 12:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]