Regarding the Lara Croft and the Guardian of Light edits about it not being isometric. 3D can be isometric but if you just look up what isometric projection actually means, then you'll see that it's not the case with this game. The references cited are wrong. Just take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Graphical_projection_comparison.png and you'll see the difference between isometric 3D and normal perspective 3D. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.246.233.77 (talk) 15:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should be going by what the sources say. Every website calls the game a "isometric platform", even the game designers. Mike Allen 19:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you planning on taking TGOL to GA soon? Mike Allen 01:24, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I have planned. :) Also, can you discuss the collapsing here? Thanks. Mike Allen 01:42, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering what you think about replacing the Sega Master System box art there with a cover either from the arcade version or from one of the computer game versions. Just wanted to see what you think about it. –MuZemike 18:11, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've answered your query here - X201 (talk) 14:29, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's incredible what the SWGemu team have accomplished and a wiki page about their work should be allowed to remain on this site.

Btw, as a fellow LDS member, I love your username.  :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kootsi (talk • contribs) 00:22, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you are saying. To be honest I'm not fully familiar with the guidelines on what is needed to satisfy the requirements of a Wikipedia article. However, the SWGemu team have been mentioned by several credible organizations such as: Crunchgear, Examiner, and SlashGear.^{[1] [2] [3]}

If I were a more capable wiki writer I would attempt to incorporate these sources myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kootsi (talk • contribs) 00:40, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to say nice work with your additions to The Maw (video game)! I have that one on my watchlist because I've always intended to expand it in the future, but so far, you're doing a fine job of it yourself! Keep up the good work, and let me know if I can ever be of any assistance! — Hunter Kahn 20:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to thank you for converting the article to prose. It really looks a lot better now and the holiday section looks less trivial as a result. Harry Blue5 (talk) 14:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mua gbaV2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion (on the article Cxbx) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. Cindamuse (talk) 00:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You need to check the code for whatever bot you're using. It added the template twice. You also need to do more than just using a bot, and read both the article you are editing, and its talk page. It's rated by me as a start class: An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources. Not only that but you could see that it is under construction. Not only that, but it contains three reliable sources, one more than is needed to be notable. Enlormn (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has been confirmed in:

XBL http://marketplace.xbox.com/en-US/Product/Cosmic-Spider-Man-Character-Pack/00000000-0000-400c-80cf-000141560881

PSN http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lftHZ2WD5sY&feature=related —Preceding

EDIT: THX for the fix confidence on DLC releases. I owe you a big time.

unsigned comment added by ScottKazama (talk • contribs) 06:31, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed in the history that you removed the Wii Zapper from the list of controller schemes due to it being a simple case for the Remote. However, the game actually regards the Zapper quite distinctly from the Remote: the button mapping is different, the targeting cross hairs are adjusted to compensate for how one holds the Zapper, players reload by aiming the Zapper below the screen, and to be properly used must be chosen in the controller settings distinct from the Remote settings. I just wanted to give you a heads up about it because I re-added the Zapper to the controller list. If you still have any concerns, just let me know. DKqwerty (talk) 21:13, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that your recent renaming of the article Race Driver: Grid to Race Driver: GRID contravenes Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks). Also, as far as I can tell, you did not use a "Move" to rename the article; a "Move" would have been a lot easier. I will leave it to you to sort this out. (If you wish to respond then please do so here.) HairyWombat 16:38, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Teancum, you recent post at WP:COIN was an attempt to out another editor. I have removed this information from the noticeboard and will get your post permanently deleted. When investigating COIs the behaviour of people on wiki is sufficient to judge whether they have a COI, also note that there is nothing in our COI guideline preventing people from editing pages related to them, it is just discouraged. SmartSE (talk) 13:04, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. SmartSE (talk) 13:26, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proves it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.131.235.156 (talk) 23:36, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not really; I'm just worked up in general. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 13:50, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More vandalism happening on the VGChartz page unfortunately. There is an ongoing talk to discuss the references and citations but certain users continue to remove them without reaching a consensus first. 92.28.197.234 (talk) 14:47, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1]

You asked for links. ----Divebomb is not British 10:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Teancum - In regards to your recent nomination of Perfect Dark for FAR, there has been no pre-FAR talk page notification, as is required by a recent change to FAR procedure. Because of this, I am untranscluding the nomination from the FAR page and removing the template from the article talk page. Please make the notification and if there is no answer after at least a week feel free to retransclude the nomination and replace the template. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 02:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I responded to your comment on F-Zero's Peer Review. Can you make some more comments? I wanna make it to A-class then take it to FAC. GamerPro64 (talk) 17:39, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, the article for Gran Turismo 5 appears to be locked, and nobody on the talk page is paying any notice at all. This looks to be one of the biggest videogames of the year, and there is lots lacking in the article - any chance you could do something to get it editable again?

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.22.71 (talk) 20:18, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cboxmondaynightcombat.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 07:57, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you reverted my edits to the Half-Life 2, Episode One, and Episode Two articles. From your summary, I gathered that you may have only wanted to undo my change of the infobox images, from box art to edited renders, so I redid all changes except the reversion to the images. I'm not sure box art is necessary, is there a page that is suitable for discussing the use of the new images instead? I could not find a policy that already covers infobox image usage, is there one? Thanks. --Pyroguy (talk) 02:24, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If, say, an obscure video-game gets a mention on one, or several websites that qualify as reliable sources, solely because the authors have contacted the website in question, would I be correct in dismissing such sources per WP:SPIP? What I sometimes find is one or two websites that have published a short blog-like entry on the subject, and I'm a bit unsure whether this counts as reliable coverage, because if the coverage is essentially just two or three lines, and then a cut and paste changelog/description from the author thrown in, does that count as coverage in reliable sources? As I see it, coverage in reliable sources means an actual full-length article, or mention in significant part of one. One last question: Am I right in assuming that WP:GAME applies if an editor returns after a debate, with a reliable source, but the article date shows that it was written after the debate took place, along with containing a mention that the authors contacted the site? The reason I'm asking is that often, I get into debates here with the members of various gaming communities who argue for including mention of things like fan-made remakes and patches on their respective games' articles, and I'd like to get some clarification on this particular subject before I run into this issue again, which I undoubtedly will. Eik Corell (talk) 08:13, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll take a look at expanding it this weekend. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 20:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've bolstered it a couple paragraphs. It could be fleshed out more, but I think I've hit all the major points. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 21:11, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On the Sudden Attack article, a user insists on adding the Taiwanese site, deleting the other external links. This has been going on for the weeks, and the user has a rotating IP. I've brought up WP:NONENGEL in edit summaries on on one of the IP's talk page, but no response. I've overstepped the 3RR rule long ago here, but I don't really see any other choice when the other user is not willing to discuss. Eik Corell (talk) 17:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive my ignorance, as this is my first GA, but why does Perfect Dark Zero appear as failed in the Revision history of Wikipedia:Good article nominations. In addition, why doesn't the PDZ article feature the GA icon at the top right corner of the article? --Niwi3 (talk) 20:26, 19 December 2010 (CET)

I would just like to thank you for fixing the issue. By the way, I've added the Template:ArticleHistory to Talk:Perfect Dark Zero to make it less confusing. I think it's good now. Anyway, thank you. --Niwi3 (talk) 15:52, 20 December 2010 (CET)

Hi,

I noticed you uploaded File:Edmund McMillen - Game Developers Conference 2010 - Day 2.jpg to Wikimedia Commons. Please make sure you upload the highest resolution available (a bot had to reupload it) and consider adding relevant categories to the image (you may create one if it does not exist).

Also, why did you tag the file as needing an OTRS permission? It is not needed if the pictures from the Flickr stream are genuine and free.

You may use this Toolserver tool which takes care of the upload part and helps you with the categorisation part.

Feel free to ask me any question you may have! Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 19:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hydro-thunder-hurricane-cover-01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you friend! These are what I am looking for! :) Trying my best to fix all of these articles.

I hope to see you more frequent, because this, though being casual game, is a worth-playing series!

Again, THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! :] – †hinhin_of_you / buzzworthy / βoy Ünder Ғlowers – 15:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rotf game cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:46, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you do not have ANY right to delete my contributions because I freelance for GameZone. I do not work as GameZone staff, but as an online helper. I do not work directly for them so you should think before you go ahead and delete. I want my contributions to be put back on each page!!! SteinlageT (talk) 02:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC) Tate Steinlage[reply]

I understand, but I am a fan of game zone, and I just want to share to other wiki community members. I do not get paid, so I am not apart of their staff. I want to be assured that my contributions here will not be deleted again like you did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SteinlageT (talk • contribs) 03:47, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point - it was mainly stylistic that I snipped out the reception in the lead, I felt the lead was a bit too long, and Raskulls isn't notable for either positive or negative reception, so I decided to remove it. Like I say though, it was stylistic on my part, so fair enough you restoring it. Thanks! Fin©™ 14:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bcr2 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:25, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How. HOW does getting rid of the headers make it look any good?

The headers broke up the sections, and allowed a person to jump to a certain section. MOS or not, the page doesn't look ANY good anymore, because everything is placed together, with no forms of telling the person what it's about. (Unless the person actually takes time to read the entire page, which isn't going to happen.

To get to the point: The sections were appropriate breakers to information, under the Gameplay header. All parts of gameplay, and getting rid of the headers would require a rewrite of the information. -Feildmaster (talk) 20:59, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the way of editing 1100AD, the Manual of Style is made incorrectly as well. Because it has Subgroups. And so is this and this (controversy?)... Or maybe I am taking it incorrectly, and thinking that gameplay isn't supposed to have subgroups? But other groups can? ...
Speaking on deleting articles, why isn't this being discussed? Leo Steel... Maybe it's because they have the "Wikified" tag? So why couldn't 1100AD get the wikified tag, instead of the "Delete this now because we say so" tag? Because you can't see what you call valid sources? Because it's not like you can't look at a couple of a persons reviews to see if they are any good. No, they have to be "accredited" and "have specific guidelines" posted? Really? ... But to get back on topic.
I'll more than willingly let 1100AD get deleted until they get better coverage on it... As soon as they get it, I'll bring it back; because I love the game. But even though I believe wikipedia should include more than just what's "a hit" in the news industry, I can't do anything about it since I'm too late in joining the "Wiki Craze," and can't bring rules into it since it's so late in the game.
Also, I am sorry for venting on you. Too many annoying things happening at once. -Feildmaster (talk) 23:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to point out that it is not showing up on our reliable sources search because it's at a different URL now: next-gen.biz. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I noticed your activity as a Good Article reviewer, and wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 02:24, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Gracias, for uploading the non-console boxart for the MK9 page, I was a bit worried people would get in a tizzy about my uploading the PS3 boxart but you've remedied my worries already, and for that here's a barnstar for your random act of kindness. :) Subzerosmokerain (talk) 02:28, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From your comments about the supposed theories, I gather that you're stubbornly reverting without even reading the comment properly, since you're assuming I'm talking about the teaser trailer, when in fact I'm talking about a TF3 preview featurette present in the Revenge of the Fallen Blu-ray disc; a featurette I linked a YouTube video of in the article's talk page, and in which Unicron is seen in its G1 form, leaving no doubt whatsoever it's him. BTW, that comment has been there since October 2010 in case you didn't notice. --uKER (talk) 11:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't say Teancum is reverting your edit. I would say Teancum is reverting the page back to my edit.--Dana60Cummins (talk) 16:47, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I partially reverted your recent edits to iRacing.com to return the content lists (cars and tracks) to the article. Though the overall edit was great and significantly cleaned up the presentation of the article, these lists are vital and standard pieces of information for articles of sim-racing titles, though I would like input on how to make them more appropriate for the article. Please visit the talk page for discussion. Thank you! Bakkster Man (talk) 16:51, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI- I just expanded X-Men Legends' development section with a preview feature in GI. I thought you might want to take a look at the changes to make sure it flows with the rest of the article. Also, I'm not sure if anything I mentioned was ultimately cut from the final game. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 21:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Might be worth asking WP:OVERSIGHT if they could remove that edit as the info is still visible in the history. - X201 (talk) 13:57, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...I have a dynamic IP from my ISP that is not under my control - if I wanted to mask my edits I'd be a damn sight more clever than just switching the last two octets of my IP address! Glad you've incorporated some of the reaction from the devs into the article in the context of the recent update, it's looking much better. Though you seem to have insinuated I have some grudge against this particular game or its developers, and despite my edit histories showing I've edited other game articles, it is merely that I have seen (and been frustrated by) many attempts by companies trying to whitewash their Wikipedia articles, and combined with their off-Wikipedia efforts to be combative or defensive to reviewers of the game, felt it was noteworthy for the game's article. 62.56.127.36 (talk) 21:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the assessment. Guess I overlooked the citations. Happy Editing! Halofanatic333 (talk) 12:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I sometimes make bad rollback reverts, my bad... sorry about that... Mìthrandir (talk) 15:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Teancum has been nominated for GA :) –MuZemike 23:09, 31 January 2011 (UTC) ... and I just quickfailed it. If you're at all interested, that article could use some mentorship and guidance... - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deal, I'll get to Transformers hopefully this afternoon. --PresN 23:11, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Teancum. You have new messages at Talk:Wizards & Warriors.
Message added 16:55, 5 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I responded, just in case you didn't notice :) –MuZemike 16:55, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You just removed the link in the X-Wing Alliance Article linking to the XWA and XvT Wiki. I see why you interprete the external link to be invalid in this position, yet this document could also be interpreted in a different, less strict way. As the title suggests, it's about links normally to be avoided. Articles about games are not normal as they're not really important subjects of public discussion. As the Wiki I want to link provides unique reference for players and newbies of the game, displaying actual and much more information than the moby games (which isn't under the control of LucasArts either) link, I suggest to keep it! Don't be too harsh on that one. Or then be consistent, you'd have to delete all external links for that game. PS: I personally guarantee for the stability of that wiki. TIA for your understanding Lenzoid (talk) 00:37, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You agreed not to delete it. Thank you man! Lenzoid (talk) 12:57, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain to me why you have gone through the article and REMOVED valid references that I added? Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Teancum. I noticed that Jedi Outcast's GAR has been up for over a week. Are you planning on closing it yet? GamerPro64 (talk) 04:29, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I delisted it. GamerPro64 (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If at all possible, I'd really appreciate if you performed a GA review of Kid Klown in Crazy Chase. :3 - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 23:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The forum I cited is the ShootForTheEdit forum. ShootForTheEdit is Michael Bay's official site, and that forum is where the production people post, sometimes even Bay himself. AFAIK, it is not known what position Nelson holds in the production team, but he is pretty knowledgeable, and has proven to be certainly more reliable than Bay. Generalizing forums to be unreliable is like saying Twitter is unreliable, even if it was the director himself tweeting. --uKER (talk) 14:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

.. for your work on Rock of Ages (video game). Have a nice day. Spinoff 16:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up though I was aware of the circumstances when they arose, haven't had access to a computer until now. Thanks. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 03:40, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the leader of the ITF. I have noticed a degree of inactivity during my absence, and we wish that you can help change this to help future articles on independent video games. Thank you, Takeo 22:42, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I jumped when I saw that on the assessment request page, you gave Characters of Assassin's Creed a High-Importance rating. So I checked the article's talk page, and there it is still rated Low. So I assume you just made a typo, and changed the text. Just wanted to let you know in case there was something other than a typo behind it. -- Nczempin (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion about the change at WT:VG/A#Yuji Horii's importance because what you say goes directly against the assesement guidelines for video games.陣内_Jinnai 22:13, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've made a new motion to rename Dota (genre) to Action RTS right here. Since you previously stated your opinion on this matter, would you be able to again, in order to get a consensus on the subject? DarthBotto _talk•cont 23:16, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Theingamer.com is well-established and credible source for game content and reviews. Why have you decided to challenge it as "not-notable" in pages containing its reviews (Metro 2033, Monday Night Combat)? What would make it more "notable"? I believe your assessment was unfairly made and deserves re-thinking. Your edits should not have been made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skorp333 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Teancum. Does the XBOX360 part of the template for XBLA games too? GamerPro64 (talk) 18:53, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thanks for your message today. I woud like to discuss this futher if possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasterAbbott (talk • contribs) 07:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How are other editors .. allowed to promote and add articles/reviews but there is an issue with ours ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasterAbbott (talk • contribs) 08:29, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was just wondering if you planned on taking this article to GAN. The article seems basically done! --PresN 20:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sorry for the delayed response at Talk:Castle Crashers/GA1. I left some further comments. The article is very close to passing. I'll the give review extra time because of my delay. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 16:31, 7 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rotf decepticon gameplay.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SuperMeatBoy limitedCover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to see you go... I'm proud to have been able to pass one of your GA nominations. Hope to see you return someday, Brambleclawx 02:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While you may be busy and inactive kinda, I was hoping that you could give Glass Joe a copyedit and/or provide a comment on its FAC. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 04:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove it? I'm fine with it now but I don't see why it should be. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 17:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So maybe I need to find a more full roster picture? Basically the entire cast, plus the DLC tabs pointed out? I can try to find one, but not without difficulty. Just give me tthe say so, and i'll start the search. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 00:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I came to apologize if my comments rubbed you the wrong way. I have too much respect for my fellow VG editors to ever do that intentionally. And given your track record of work here, I consider you my fellow VG editor even if we've rarely interacted. I only meant to voice an opinion that I felt would go unheard in the sense that no real action would come from it regardless of what was said—something PresN pointed out in the discussion.

That being said, I still believe in my opinion. (Although I'll readily admit the possibility that it might not the best treatment.) I think it is still inline with all the applicable policies and guidelines, including WP:V. If you disagree, that's perfectly ok. You are a competent editor and can draw your own conclusions just like me. But I hope there is no bad blood and that we can amicably agree to disagree. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 22:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]

What about just having one icon (iOS) to minimise the number. I think the article still needs an icon to allow users to recognise the game when downloading it from App Store, Android Market, etc as the logo in the infobox is not similar to the icon that appears in the download centers.
--Esebi95 (talk) 13:24, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I received your note re: paragraphs. No problem: nothing I was attached to. I also note you are "retiring". That seems like a shame. Wikipedia has hundreds of less than desirable editors, but few solid contributors. I hope you will come back at some point in the future. Regards Thebladesofchaos (talk) 00:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gunstringer logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:32, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Heck I didn't know that! Thanks for telling me! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mewtwo465 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick fix to the "Platform(s)" field of Star Wars: Battlefront II's Infobox. ProResearcher (talk) 12:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A page you have edited has been involved in the Wikipedia Dispute Resolution Mechanism. If you wish to take part please click here. Some of the editors working on it have been accused of being sock puppets including myself, information on that can be found here. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 14:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Teancum. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Transformers: Fall of Cybertron.
Message added 04:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New msg. Odie5533 (talk) 04:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NFS TheRun QTE.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NFS TheRun QTE.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:53, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ay Teancum! Sad to see you are retired, but glad to see that you are still editing anyways! :) It has been a while since I have seen you around at SWBF3 - anyways, just want to wish a happy holidays and a happy new year. Cheers mate, take great care, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:01, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I'm tearing through the male video game character articles right now to tidy them up as it stands. If you think you can do something with him though, I'm all for it.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 18:53, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Sine Mora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hungarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will make sure thats how I do it in future, was just reverting the removals pending an outcome of the debate Adycarter (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed Forza Motorsport 4. Please the review here. TBrandley 10:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]