Hi, it's me again. Believe me when I say that I know where you're coming from in your removal of the external links from Bungie's game articles. I am very familiar with WP's policies on the subject. For instance, you'll note that they forbid "most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority", and allow "Sites which fail to meet criteria for reliable sources yet still contain information about the subject of the article from knowledgeable sources" (that part's under WP:ELMAYBE). I can easily demonstrate that the fansites at Bungie.org are (a) recognized authorities and (b) based on knowledgeable sources. I'll wait for a response from you before providing specific evidence, so I know that you are committed to a reasonable dialogue on this matter before spending more time on this subject.

For now I will just re-iterate that without permitting anyone to link to the fansites you removed links to, it is impossible for someone interested in one of those games to learn of the advancements that have been made in the several years since the game's release (aside from the fact that you removed Myth's fansites from the external links section but left the duplicate links up in the body of the article, thus not affecting that article's compliance with WP:EL after all). Therefore, I believe that these links in particular can be considered valuable enough to leave in-place. I hope that you take a little time to follow the deleted URLs and learn about the subject matter before responding, as the situation that exists with these Bungie titles is not an ordinary one among video games. Thank you.

P.S.: If you were concerned about the number of external links that were present in some of these articles, I would be glad to help you determine which links are not adding substantially to the article to avoid a "linkfarm" situation. --Iritscen (talk) 17:17, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks much for re-considering the removed links. The Myth article in particular definitely suffered from linkcruft, so I agree that most of those links deserved to be removed (after all, if the reader can follow even one link into the community, they should be able to get around just fine from there). But in fact I am not sure how I feel about The Tain getting cut along with every other fansite link. The thing about the Myth community is that they have an official place in the "family" at myth.bungie.org, but for various reasons unknown to me, they really only use their own server now at tain.totalcodex.net. However, they are still "the" fan community and an ongoing source of downloads and updates (they just released a new Myth II build recently, for instance), so it would be nice to provide just that one fansite link.

(And, in fact, by my count there are still six external links in the body of the article, not counting the fact that MariusNet is linked to three times, so I think once we agree on which links are important, the "Community hub" section can be blasted from the article, seeing as Wikipedia frowns on external links within article bodies.)

As to Marathon, it seems that the one really important link for downloading the Trilogy has already been restored (I don't think I will restore Traxus because it seems that general consensus is against wikis of that sort), and as to Oni, I agree with your suggestion to restore just oni.bungie.org, not the wiki. Thanks again, and sorry if I was overly zealous/verbose in defending the links before. I will take action on the Oni page and await your thoughts on keeping just the Tain link for the Myth page. --Iritscen (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi again, just wanted to remind you in case you lost track of it in my wall of text up there ^: I am still waiting on your opinion about keeping just the one fansite link for the Myth page(s), the one for the Tain, which is basically the community HQ (reasoning above). If it's okay with you, I will add that back in and remove the redundant section of external links further up in the article. Thanks. --Iritscen (talk) 15:08, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for assessing Saw (video game), I really appreciate the constructive criticism you gave which helps make it a better article (even though its not even released yet). I have dewiki linked a lot of basic topics as suggested, I think I've taken out the obvious and left the right stuff. I am going to cut the watermarks soon on the images and get rid of a few. Also, I have spent a while cutting down and organizing the gameplay section, which I agree was a real bore to read. It wasn't really cut down that much though. Finally, a lot of the characters and gameplay references are from Youtube videos, which isn't exactly a reliable source. I know the content is accurate, it just doesn't seem good policy to ref it.

I was wondering if you could look at the article now, not necessarily assess it, but check the suggestions you gave me to see if I fixed the issues. I realize that it most likely won't make C class due to the lack of info because its not released but I'd appreciate it. Sorry to leave a huge long report on you lol GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 03:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Me again. I've done everything thoroughly on the checklist you gave me and I think I've finally perfected this article with the information released thusfar. Would you mind assessing it this one last time so I can confirm it is worthy of a C class? Thanks, GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 08:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

I ddn't mean to be so pushy before in the MUA2 thread. It's just that I can't stress enough she's in the game. Lani Minella told me that she WAS voicing Lucia Von Bardas AND The Contessa. Like I've said before, audiogodz.com and then lani@audiogodz.com --Billybob4412 (talk) 19:36, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Just be ready to readd the plot on the day of it's release or leave it as a hidden message until then. Rtkat3 (talk) 4:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

You deleted my post despite it not being a personal attack at all. Elitist is not an insult, so I would appreciate that if you are going to threaten me by saying what I am posting is personal attacks then you make it when I am actually insulting someone.Recycledmaterials (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

You mean like the negative connotation on the previous comment before mine that was directed to me? I'm sure no steps were taken in that one. Whether elitist is taken as a compliment isn't my fault because regardless it is still not an insult. If I called someone a pineapple and they were offended by it how would that make any sense to reprimand me.Recycledmaterials (talk) 21:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Hey, I know you are a pretty good editor and have had some experience editing video game related articles, so I was wondering if you could help me out? I have started an article in my subpages about cover systems in video games. I was hoping you could take a look at it here and give me some advice on it before I place it into the Wiki mainspace. I realize I have no references or images yet, but I was mainly curious about my writing style and if there are any extra subjects in this article I need to cover. Much appreciated, GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 00:03, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much, this was exactly the type of advice I was looking for. I do have some sources so it isn't original research but I've been to lazy to add them just yet. I really appreciate the list of sources you left me as well. I will get working on this right away. Cheers, GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 03:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Basically the user has a fetish for adding in resolution info to game infoboxes and edit warring to keep them in using subpar sources; see his contribs around June 17 2008 for his worse offenses. Then there's his continued insistence on adding pro-PS3 information to articles whereever possible, then calling us fanboys [1] So in general, it would be great for all involved if he just stayed away. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 14:50, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Kudos for the consistent effort on Marvel: Ultimate Alliance and the sequel. The fancruft additions appear everyday, and without fail you tidy up. I know the feeling. Someday when the comic side of things is in order, I'd like to help with the games. In the meantime, keep up the good work. Regards. Asgardian (talk) 03:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

		The VG Barnstar
		Thank you for a super-diligent review and the pointers for further improvements you left on the article's talk page. MLauba (talk) 16:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your advice and help in improving the Far Gate article. I note you've gone through and changed all the spellings to American. My understanding was that once an article has been largely standardised in a single spelling format, etiquette was to leave it in that format? As it was largely written by me it was consistently Australian English. Is there a reason for the change? Appreciate your response, and thanks again for joining in on the attempt to improve the article! -DustFormsWords (talk) 23:49, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 17:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey again. I have been further editing the Saw (video game) article and so I listed it for assessment for WP:VG. Seeing as how we have corresponded in the past and you seem to be the primary assesser lately, I was wondering if you could assess it? I realize I am asking for either GA or A class, which is a lengthier assessment process, but I'm not sure how else to get it rolling. I would appreciate this if you had the time. Thanks again, GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 07:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello! I noticed that you've been reviewing nominations at Featured article candidates. Thank you for your help, and I hope you will continue to contribute! You may already be familiar with the FAC criteria by now, but in case you aren't, you can check out the Featured article criteria. Also, the following dispatches are useful for reviewing nominations:

• Reviewers achieving excellence
• Reviewing images (free images / non-free images)
• Reliable sources in content review processes

The best way to learn is by doing, but here is a quick reference of the things to check for each nomination you review:

Quick reference A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes. It is: well-written: its prose is engaging and of a professional standard; comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context; well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature; claims are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations where appropriate; neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias; stable: it is not subject to ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process; and compliant with Wikipedia's copyright policy and free of plagiarism or too-close paraphrasing. It follows the style guidelines, including the provision of: a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections; appropriate structure: a substantial but not overwhelming system of hierarchical section headings; and consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using footnotes—see citing sources for suggestions on formatting references. Citation templates are not required. Media. It has images and other media, where appropriate, with succinct captions and acceptable copyright status. Images follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the criteria for inclusion of non-free content and be labeled accordingly. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses summary style where appropriate. Useful links Featured articles • Featured article candidates • Featured article review • Featured article log

Thanks again for your help! I look forward to continuing to work with you at FAC, and if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me or anyone else at FAC. Now get to reviewing some noms! Karanacs (talk) 20:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your input!! Karanacs (talk) 20:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I guess you meant to create this as a userpage, so I have moved it to User:Teancum/GAcopyPaste before somebody speedies it. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

{{wpb}} is usually used if there are at least 3 projects. Is there a reason you feel the need for Talk:Fallout 3 downloadable content to have it? MrKIA11 (talk) 19:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Fallout3 brokensteel.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Peripitus (Talk) 13:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks - quick work ! - Peripitus (Talk) 14:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

It seems you've failed the GA review of Warcraft: Orcs & Humans but provide no explanation. Please explain. --Philcha (talk)

Deficiences in your review at Talk:Warcraft: Orcs & Humans/GA1:

• No examples of why you consdered the prose unsatisfactory. The sub-sebsections are similar to those to Age of Empires (video game) (GA, Jan 2009) - but Warcraft: Orcs & Humans was more concise.
• I completely disagree with "The Reception section needs major cleanup. Consider combining everything into around five paragraphs". Read Jakob Nielsen (usability consultant) on how people who read on the Web or other screen-media need short pars. The paras were about different aspects of reviwers' comments.
• No explain why you think the FUR for File:Warcraft Orcs v Humans 01.png is at fault.
• "There is far too much detail for things like spells and things, and it unfortunately borders WP:GAMECRUFT" needs explanation.

I suspect I spent more time on reading your review than you did reading the article. With no explanations, right now your review looks like WP:IDONTLIKEIT. --Philcha (talk) 00:30, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Why was this failed with no hold at all? It is customary to hold for seven days. Your points could easily have been answered / addressed in that time. This looks like a very shoddy review to me - you didn't bother to put an under review tag on the GAN page according to this diff.[2]. Please familiarise yourself with the review process before thinking about undertaking any more reviews. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:41, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

This is being discussed at WT:Good article nominations#Warcraft: Orcs & Humans failed w/o any comments. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:01, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. However, it does say "if possible, replace..." but in this case, there have been no other publications stating any sales figures at all for Saw, so I was wondering if this could be kept because this is the only source for sales? GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 08:39, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. I went ahead and worded it: While these figures have not been challenged, the NPD Group, a more recognized sales authority, has yet to verify these sales numbers. so that readers would know these figures are most likely right but unverified. Sound good? If someone deletes it I won't bother re-adding it as the article is up for GA nomination and i don't want an edit war or it being failed for unreliable sources. Anyways thanks and happy edits, GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 10:59, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to give me a barnstar or smile at me, supportive enough to agree with me, etc., a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 06:10, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I believe you may have mistakenly removed some comments from an AfD recently whilst adding your own. Here is the diff for your convenience: [3] Hope this helps, happy editing. --Taelus (talk) 15:09, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Halo-3-odst soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:22, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		Your continued work at keeping Star Wars: Battlefront III free of speculation and unreliable content has been accurate and diligent to the utmost degree. I can only imagine that such work of yours is reciprocated in other articles as well. Don't mind me; please, keep it up! Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Gt1 soundof.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Gt1 ost.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Gran-turismo-4-original-soundtrack-cd-cover-art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Gt4 ost.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:GT5 prologue OST.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Mua gba.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey again. I noticed you put Cover system (gaming) under low importance on the talk page. I rather think it should be at least mid if not high importance due to its immense revolution in modern gaming and the influences in nearly every third-person shooter today as well as some first-person shooters. In addition, it has consequently changed video game development approaches and styles for many studios and it has become an even more fundamental aspect of gaming than even Survival Horror, which is high importance in wiki video games now. Anyways what do you think? GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 01:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for giving so much constructive advice on how to increase the standard of Crash Time: Autobahn Pursuit. I was surpised that it didn't have an article until I created it as the vast majority of Xbox 360 games get an article within minutes of being announced. I only know about it because I've played it. There's not a lot of information on it to be honest, and much, much less on the sequels. They have all passed under the radar. AirRaidPatrol 84 (talk) 23:10, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey there, thanks for responding to my second opinion flag for the GAN of Scribblenauts. I think you explained my thoughts much better than I did and I appreciate that. Do you think we should put the GAN on hold or keep it as it is? My only concern is that the editor has not responded to the advice given and the article has not changed fundamentally since it was nominated over a month ago. Ideas? GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 23:04, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dogs (Call of Duty). Since you had some involvement with the Dogs (Call of Duty) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 06:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC) —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 06:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Teancum, thank you for stepping up and helping out the Video games WikiProject in the assessment department and your tireless efforts in deletion debates. Your fine editing has not gone unnoticed, and on behalf of Wikipedians everywhere I present you with this Barnstar of Invisibility, for working in the "boiler room" of the project on some of our most important but perhaps less glorified areas. — Mr. Van Tine (t – c) 09:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

To those who make Good Arguments, who are appreciative, or supportive. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 19:26, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

I had some harsh words about a GA review. A few later I realised I was ill and the article was I think the poorest I've nom'd. I apologise. Merry Christmas. --07:33, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for closing the Talk:Warcraft: Orcs & Humans/GA2 review of Warcraft: Orcs & Humans. Do you have any idea what appeared to Mukkakukaku?

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		I've also appreciated your interest in the progress of the article and Talk:Warcraft: Orcs & Humans/GA2 in spite of my harsh words about Talk:Warcraft: Orcs & Humans/GA1. Philcha (talk) 01:36, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Please participate in this discussion to decide if the wording of The Force Unleashed should be "foment" or "foster." Thank you. --Thejadefalcon^{Sing your song}_{The bird's seeds} 15:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Hey there and happy late new year. I thought I would let you know that I have reviewed the Ninja Gaiden (Nintendo Entertainment System) article and I have since supported the A-class assessment. I felt I should leave it up to you to document it as an A-class because you are the first reviewer. Anyways happy edits, GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 21:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I completely agree. The only reason I left it on hold is because you recommended a month wait and also if the editor was aggressively fixing the article. Since you agree it should be closed I going to. Hopefully this will cut down the massive backlog on the GAN page. Thanks, GroundZ3R0 002 23:36, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

UPDATE: Hey again, I have replied to your merge discussion on the Talk:Saw: The Video Game (soundtrack) page. Also, on a side note, I was wondering if we were allowed to close other merge discussions on our own? I speak mainly of the Saw (2003) article, which has been in discussion for over a year now and the version that was nom'd for merge isnt even similar to the one now. Another merge article is Hello Zepp, which hasnt changed as much so I am reluctant to close the discussion but that has also been in an inactive discussion for over a year. I left you another message above this by the way. Cheers, GroundZ3R0 002 03:22, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

It seems you forgot to transclude your GA review for Saw (video game). I have done so for you, I hope you don't mind. Happy editing! --Remy Suen (talk) 22:17, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

I was wondering which rationale would apply because I took the photo File:David Tapp (Saw game).JPG myself, but it is of a copyrighted game, so is this free or nonfree screenshot? GroundZ3R0 002 23:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Okay thanks. Do you know how to revcover web archives? im trying to find the archive of this page for the quote box as it is a direct quote. If not thats fine. GroundZ3R0 002 00:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Okay everything you listed is done. I really must give most of the credit to User:MikeAllen, who did nearly all of the checklist you made. Everything you asked has been done. The only thing I am wondering, is the disambiguation/self redirect page says that two links link back to the article itself, but I cant seem to find them. Could you help me find them? Other than that, I believe this is a GA article by your standards. Cheers, GroundZ3R0 002 04:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

←→This may be out of place, but how and when is the right time to quality for a FAC? —Mike Allen 05:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

I believe this is it. You don't review FAC? I'm going to do a few more tweaks to the article and then list it as a candidate after that's done. It don't won't it to be turned down as soon as it's listed. lol —Mike Allen 06:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments on the article. I think I have addressed them all. Are you interested in doing a full review? :) Theleftorium 22:08, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much for taking your time and doing the review. I appreciate it! :-) Theleftorium 20:38, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

I got battlefront 2 for PC to get the mods for it, and I come across your name- recieving the credit for these mods. Wanting to know if it was indeed you who made- or help make- them. ConvoPack 1.0, ConvoPack 2.0, and ConvoPack 2.2.--P dump (talk) 19:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Nice. Those mods are awesome. I got the 2.o you made, but for some reason the KotOR era didn't install. Gonna get 2.2 anyhow. You made all of these just using the mod tools. I was wondering if you're gonna do any more. The New Jedi Order books offer a great era, so does the upcoming Old Republic game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by P dump (talk • contribs) 01:02, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

If you're going to "merge" them, then I suggest you notify New Age Retro Hippie, and you also need to remove all the translusions of it. I'm guessing they meant to create both peer reviews to reach a broader audience. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 14:19, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

hey, do you think it should not have its own article? and maybe be mentioned in another article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sthowp (talk • contribs) 19:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

My apologies, you are indeed correct in reverting my external link change. Upon viewing the site again its clear this time, and the site actually fully loaded. The previous time I checked something must have messed up since the page was malformed and thus I jumped to the conclusion just from some of the wording there, as I could not see the disclaimers etc at the bottom. My apologies for any inconvenience, --Taelus (talk) 01:59, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Do you have a problem with Jack o Lanturn in Marvel Ultimate Alliance? Rodimus Rhyme (talk) 18:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Alright, you win. Rodimus Rhyme (talk) 21:25, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Not to make you add him in but, I also realised he had a Concept art and dossier within the game. Rodimus Rhyme (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Here's some evidence that he did appear in more than 1 cutscene. [4] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodimus Rhyme (talk • contribs) 17:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

But can I just add in this hidden reminder? <!-- Jack o Lanturn is not notable, please do not add in.--> It reminds the person that he's not notable. Rodimus Rhyme (talk) 22:33, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

There's an anonymous user on the Battlefield: Bad Company 2‎ article that keeps forcing through their own, unencyclopedic edits. Eik Corell (talk) 17:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I have to say I felt that your review for World at War was surprisingly positive and lenient. I was considering reviewing that one myself, and had already done a cursory look over that highlighted some pretty important failings, though these could conceivably be solved in the hold period. I don't want to butt in the review, but I really feel the need to voice these concerns. So I'd ask that you might consider the following as you continue your review, but please don't think I'm trying to tell you what to do:

• the poor flowing and far too long synopsis section: 6 paragraphs, over 900 words, mission-by-mission with all sorts of unnecessary trivialities. 1a and 3b
• the lack of development information for a high-profile mainstream game, though some sources were pointed to in previous GANs. 3a
• the reception section for a game of this profile built around essentially only four reviews (GameSpot, 1UP, IGN and OXM), far from being a comprehensive analysis of critical opinion. For more obscure subjects, small numbers of reviews can be accepted, but this is a high-profile mainstream game with plenty of reviews available. 3a
• the presence of five non-free screenshots with poor captioning and none of them having a solid rationale to justify their presence. You've already picked up on this to an extent in the review. One screenshot is usually enough, two if really necessary, but five? 6a and 6b

-- Sabre (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Hey Teancum, read on the revision of Ged Uk in the history of Gamesoft Technology. Glenfarclas already requested speedy deletion and Ged Uk, a Wikipedia administrator declined it. Look below deletion declined Please don't mess time! Majestic27 ^{Talk to me...} 14:20, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

You tagged Flashing light of death for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A7. However, that speedy deletion criterion only applies to "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content". An article about a general software product does not apply. Still less does an article about a computer/video game hardware product, which this is. There have been several proposal to extend the scope of A7 that have failed. There is not currently a consensus to apply A7-style speedy deletion outside the above-mentioned quite narrow range of topics (note the specific exception for articles about schools). I don't think there should be, but of course consensus can change. But until and unless the speedy criteria do change, please be careful to limit speedy deletion tags to articles clearly within the current criteria. Thank you. DES ^(talk) 20:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

First off, thanks for your assessment of that article. Looking at your edit summary in that quick-assessment, I wanted to note that the game's development and reception information were combined into one "History" section. I mean, there obviously is enough reception information in there but not enough development information to fit an entire stand-alone paragraph let alone its own stand-alone section. Another thought I just had was renaming "History" as "Development and Reception" or just "Reception". –MuZemike 20:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Please stop removing the images from the "Sarbakan" entry. I don't know how clearer I can make it in the image comments: These images are used with Sarbakan's permission.

STOP. DELETING. THEM!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lextarget (talk • contribs) 16:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't why the ban is not set expired. I don't know any, but i already being a change guy & erased my sins (rude) behavior. I got alot of members to help some fixes/updates. Here's the gift:

1.http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=2ec558a423b9b5a5d2db6fb9a8902bda: That includes whiteking & Larcetin's mod updates patch + tetragene Dazzler Mod (I already permit with tetragene to upload a mirror after i PM tetragene in via YouTube), Fightstyle Packages folders for iammingy) 2.http://s719.photobucket.com/albums/ww199/Power_Cosmic/ (There's: Omega Red 2nd costume Revenge, & PSP Villain Huds, Venom Marvel Knights Bulky skin that reskin & take from iammingy's Thunderbolts & Marvel Knights Thin, Thing icon sets for Gevth Booster (Icon Set:Payback(8),Hard Rock(6),Grimm Shockwaves(9))

News is i have all members mods fixes/updates, sir. Is there any mods,skins,meshes you wanted to be fixed, if you want some help from me. Email me at Yahoo (the name still same as Gmail's email name, but i'm currently not in Gmail)

My current mod talent works: Huds (100%) Loadscreens (100%) (MUA2,XML Series Converted & Unofficial Characters Loadscreen includes) Fix/Updates any wrong files which was not have affection to the game or something different in the files (90%) Skins & Meshes fix issue to Arcade Androids on hex editing (80%) (Using HDD) Reskinning (30%) (Venom Marvel Knights Bulky & Hawkeye 3 Arrows are done in photoshoped) Unlimited/Ultimate Combo Booster (80%) (Comibination between fresh installation boosters and members boosters, i should permit them first, but i don't even know they're email, example: Nowhere Man, matt710 and MarvelFan12345. I was to try help Blaw for FINAL Heart of Ice last power of the 4th boost called Ice Sidekick liked in XML2, but bad news i need my computer repaired from the help of the specialist to get Blaw's Booster on Unlimted Level) Icon Banners (40%) (Thing new icons, prototype)

Signed Lars, i'm no longer being Power Cosmic anymore alright. I not ready go back right now, i got alot things to do and having some test to succedded.

Thanks for uploading File:Transformersthegame bumblebee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 02:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

		The Invisible Barnstar
		For all the work you do behind the scenes, and all the little edits you perform to articles such as handling spammy external links, working with templates, and your reviewing work at talk pages and WikiProject Video Games. Thanks for all your efforts! Taelus (talk) 23:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

??????. What is lifted means. --ScottKazama (talk) 04:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm having a problem on Login (But it does not exist) & try to change into new one (in account name LarsAlexandersson of course) + Registration (not register in multiple, just checking on it) & it says registration is currently disabled. What should i do. Is it ok to make a new one >confused<. I'm ready to go back and see what's new. --ScottKazama (talk) 21:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

You were involved in a debate on the talk page there a few months ago. That debate has flared up again, and at this point, I'm leaning toward including what it said because he has presented a reliable source, but I'm not sure, so I hope you'll take a look. Eik Corell (talk) 11:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

My username Power_Cosmic does not exist in marvelmods. & i did'nt see you respond on this awnser. You still O.L. (online in Indonesia dub) in marvelmods yesterday. --ScottKazama (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

MOS link? --Koveras ^☭ 18:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Halo reach civilians.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:41, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Star Wars: Battlefront III. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars: Battlefront III. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me Teancum. Can you be the second reviewer for Project Sylpheed's A-class assessment? GamerPro64 (talk) 14:09, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

I have no problem with spoilers, but this ending is poorly written. If you're going to re-add it then make it readable. Darrenhusted (talk) 16:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Actually he is. He appears on this in this cutscene: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv68t3eag2s

See the Flame Head Guy over there. That's Jack O'Lantern alright + i saw the concept art of him in the video game. I'm not try to do vandalism, i just want to add something who appantly appears on the game, that's all. ScottKazama (talk 16:00, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I caught it when I got onto Firefox though. I always google-check for new MK reception. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 17:43, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

The reliable source is here. And on Wookieepedia they tell that the PC version will be developed by Aspyr. 84.86.199.99 (talk) 12:23, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

This trailer is at least officially, at the end of this trailer, all announced platforms. 84.86.199.99 (talk) 16:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

You removed my hard-worked writeup of the temporary glitches to the game, which are a significant part of the game's history. I did not in any way demean the game, Rockstar, or anything of the such. Please post a valid reason for the deletion of this material. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vemnox (talk • contribs) 13:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

He removed your edit due to a lack of sources and original research, which is the same reason I removed it as well. I'd also say that it's not really notable unless it is widely reported on. ferret (talk) 14:49, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Okay, sorry, thanks for the advice.
benBRFC ^talk 13:16, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

I thought there was sufficient indication of significance here to escape A7 speedy deletion. If it is to be deleted, it should probably go via a deletion discussion, in my view. Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Why do you keep removing my update on Halo: Reach? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spelling Natsi (talk • contribs) 16:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Ahhh, well I was a little frustrated about the removal of it, but now that I know why I thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spelling Natsi (talk • contribs) 16:22, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

What I really meant with the vandalism for Tom and Jerry: War of the Whiskers will be seen on the article's talk page.

MadManAmeica (talk) 00:23, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I believe that I have addressed your concerns listed on the GA review page of this article. Thanks, A8x (talk) 01:56, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure that I got to everything you pointed out again, the dates seem good right now. A8x (talk) 13:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok, now I'm certain that your concerns have been addressed. A8x (talk) 22:55, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. I cut it down again, it is now some 730 words. Considering that video games are usually much longer than feature films (where the word limit comes from), and that the adventure genre is probably the most plot-centric kind of games, I guess this should be okay. Again, thanks. Prime Blue (talk) 15:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Teancum. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Alternative text for images#No longer a requirement?.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Not sure if I'd call it a mediation or not, but there's a dispute going on at the Precursors article - A guy wants to include mention of his own patch for the game, using this [5] as a source. As I see it, that's not a reliable source. Similarly, he has had a large part in editing the Vampire: The Masquarade - Bloodlines where he has added mention of a patch he has also made for that game. I've started debate on both article talk pages. Eik Corell (talk) 13:36, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Teancum. At User_talk:Philcha#Chronology_of_Warcraft_II I've been trying to make sense of the present tense vs. past tense in the backstory - Blizzard makes it very difficult. I'd be grateful if you could have a look and see if it's sensible.

I also think that, with your skills, you could produce GAs and then FAs. --Philcha (talk) 15:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Sure, I'll take a look. I never remember if I've got anyone's email addresses, so just shoot me a mail and I'll reply with whatever I can find in a few days. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 16:32, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Why did you delete the edit I did to the Halo reach article? CJISBEAST (talk) 16:24, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

I noticed you uploaded that image, if you don't mind, can I request two more images from you for that page? I think it should have at least 3 images in the content of the article. I'm not sure if there's something against having that many but I think it should have: gameplay (like the image you posted), an image of an x-ray move(to represent the innovation of the game), and the character select screen when the game is finally released like in the Victorious Boxers: Ippo's Road to Glory article. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 20:45, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Before/after? I think someone posted one of Johnny Cage on a forum I went to, something about the hair being rendered poorly in the debut trailer but better in the E3 gameplay. I'll try to find it and link to you, and yeah I agree, it would be pointless at this minute to put more. But I expect the article to double in size by release. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 20:56, 23 August 2010 (UTC)