• User_talk:Tannin/030301
• User_talk:Tannin/030407
• User_talk:Tannin/030430
• User_talk:Tannin/030516
• User_talk:Tannin/030606
• User_talk:Tannin/030715
• User_talk:Tannin/030923
• User_talk:Tannin/040224
• User_talk:Tannin/050220
• User_talk:Tannin/150715

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mud nest builders. Since you had some involvement with the Mud nest builders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tannin. You might not know that your article Quokka is referenced in David Mitchell's Man Booker longlisted novel The Bone Clocks, p. 321:

"What's a quokka? Besides a hell of a Scrabble score."

"An endangered marsupial. The first Dutch who landed here thought they were giant rats, so they called the place Rat's Nest Island: Rottnest, in Dutch. Most mainland quokkas got killed by dogs and rats, but they've managed to survive here."

"If the archaeology falls through, there's always natural history."

Aoife smiles. "I Wikipediaed them five minutes ago."

Just thought you might be interested. --Antiquary (talk) 20:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Markdask. Tannin, thanks for creating Fictional national animals!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This excellent article would be so much better if it had references to go with the individual animals.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mark^Dask 15:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tannin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:NP225.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sibley-Monroe checklist 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sibley-Monroe checklist 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Therapyisgood (talk) 02:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of common World War II infantry weapons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of common World War II infantry weapons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Loafiewa (talk) 19:19, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is such thing as subvariety in the taxonomy of plants, what is it used for? if so, please give me an example of a plant that has a subvariety and explain what the subvariety epithet means and what subvariety of plants used for. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by BloxyColaSweet (talk • contribs) 22:40, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I start the dearth for tannin to find out what happened to tannin after wiki 103.35.82.34 (talk) 14:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Copperhead (snake) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 5#Copperhead (snake) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page Macroscelidea has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://veteriankey.com/insectivores-insectivora-macroscelidea-scandentia/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. — Diannaa (talk) 21:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]