Welcome!

Hello, Syxx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Benon 01:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:AndyHodgson.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Quentin X 13:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Syxx, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:NWo logo.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Syxx. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to move forward with your obvious agenda of a magazine war in the Bloodstained Memoirs article, I will have the IP checks on the accounts of all entries made on both magazines and compare them with yours. Considering the FSM magazine is trying to be favoured, most likley that one as something smells very fishy.

Sales is not what this is about. A magazine can do poorly for 15 years and still be in circulation. The reason the magazine is respected is due to its high recognition from wrestling fans and wrestlers, with many wrestlers having subscriptions and indeeed doing interviews. Stores stocking the magazine in high quantities around the world. Various third party press sources citing the magazine. There is no need to cite references for a passing comment within an article which does not reference what the article actualy is. The reason this rule was implicated is because articles would get tacky and lose focus. For instance, what could be cited as "Highly Respected" which would not just be an opinion? It comes down to common sense (which is backed up with the above) gained from a general concensus.

I suggest you read the Wiki guidelines some more. If you continue chasing this agenda, I will have no further choice than to take it up with the admins. - Mr. Irrationally Paranoid A.K.A. Arthur Cutz (talk) 09:29, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss such changes as this prior to proceeding. The compilation Encore-Live and Direct does not contain the song "Nessaja" [1] [2], it's the only single released off of the compilation album 24 Carat Gold [3] [4]. As for this edit of yours, you should provide a proof that it was released in UK as simply "The logical song" instead of its original title "Ramp! (The logical song). Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 04:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Scooter (band). Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 13:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For a German topic, neither American nor British wins by default: it depends on how the article started. The original article used American grammar, so this article should stay that way.—Kww(talk) 02:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at [5]. First version, begins with "Scooter is..." .—Kww(talk) 13:02, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you reverted my edit (which you indicated to be vandalism) to the PJ & Duncan discography, in which I removed the reference to Ant & Dec as their real names. Their real names are Anthony McPartlin and Declan Donnelly. Why not just say "now known as Ant & Dec" which is indisputably true? Labalius (talk) 18:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Syxx. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Syxx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Syxx. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]