Hallo! Dank u voor equalizing de kolommen. Ik waardeer het. Good job! Ik weet niet Nederlands. Maar ik ben met behulp van iGoogle. Ik hoop dat je dit leest! About the article Handyman in English. English-wikipedia. Tomwsulcer --Tomwsulcer (talk) 01:33, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have commented on your recent move of this article on its talk page. I'd be interested in your response. --Macrakis (talk) 15:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey just a friendly note about definition of a word. Some terms already include an inherent qualifier in their meaning (such as ATM includes the word "machine" thus saying ATM Machine is like saying "automated teller machine machine). It's a very tiny, tiny tiny issue and I'm sure you probably were editing too fast and made careless mistake so no biggie. I'm not grammar police just friendly guy giving random dictionary/encyclopedia advice whereever I won't get immediately banned asap!

So it's your call I won't revert your edit, but just giving friendly reminder that the term "life expectancy" according to my 1998 Simon Shuster illustrated dictionary states that life expectancy is "numerical representation of the average number of years that is likely to be lived by an individual or group pertaining to a specificied initial condition, such as birth, race, or sex" again my dictionary is usually 100% retarded and backwards as it defines marriage as between a man and a woman so that destroys all credibility for its usefulness and/or accuracy as a reference material! So feel free to take what it says with a grain of salt.

One last "FYI" is that when a doctor says that a cancer is "curable" that means it can be 100% cured whereas "treatable" means that it can give an individual either a 5% or more increase in the life expectancy or it can improve the patients quality of life (even if there is no change in life expectancy) so if your rich grandfather gets offered $500,000 chemo treatment and his insurance won't cover it letting you pay cash just remember that when a doctor says a cancer is "treatable" that is just weasel wording and/or window dressing when in fact it means that you'll live between 5% - 99% longer (but could very well mean 5% you gotta read into the studies where the data is hidden from commoners and/or people who are unfamiliar with cancer lingo). 72.196.99.114 (talk) 19:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. English is not my first language; to me it reads as "expected time to live", which was given with a finite range. When a group is targeted, it cannot be anything but an average, but if a single person is targeted this is not immediately clear to me. The range could as well be adjusted for additional factors only that person has. Sumurai8 (talk) 20:34, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Noa Wildschut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not yet notable by criteria for classical music performers

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 02:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sumurai8,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Etzedek24 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Noa Wildschut should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noa Wildschut .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Etzedek24}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 21:45, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramón Flores (trumpet player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramón Flores (trumpet player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 17:30, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sumurai8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ramón Flores (trumpet player), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]