I left a message on Template talk:NHLPlayoffs regarding the location of the home and away teams. Since you've done the most work on the template, you might be the best person to do the maintenance on this. Thanks. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:02, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into making an adjustment to the template sometime in the next couple of months as I am currently preoccupied with other projects outside of Wikipedia. In any case, due to the large adoption of this template on several different articles the changes that must be made so that all those articles are not disturbed. The change I am contemplating will implement a new parameter that will allow for the switching of the position of the home and away teams. Following the change, users will have to manually insert the parameters into each instance of the template that they wish to change the position of the home and away teams (as well as make any changes in the appearance of the hidden statistics section. Once all articles have been verified to include the parameter (whether they are sticking to the original positions or the new positions), then the default position can then be set to away vs. home. Keep in mind that this is a quite expansive, difficult and time-consuming change to implement effectively without disturbing many articles. —Sukh17 ^Talk 20:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article James Leitch Elementary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable elementary school, fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ukexpat (talk) 20:59, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gomes Elementary School(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:45, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chadbourne Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mission Valley Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:49, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parkmont Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:American High School, Fremont, California (approximate model).gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 11:09, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Floor plann (American High School, Fremont, California).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:14, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Sukh17's original work of 2007 was copied and uploaded to Commons herea few months after his last activity in 2012. The Commons image is used to good effect in the American High School (Fremont, California) article. --Hjal (talk) 00:39, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NHLBracket/2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if you'll ever continue work on the template, which I had recently discovered and left a topic on WikiProject NBA? I would want to know so we may finally consider it. –Piranha249 (talk) 23:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sukh17. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ice Hockey Game has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]