The problem is that the article is covered under Wikipedia:No original research. The article must comply with Wikipedia:Verifiability. Even if the material is wrong it dosn't matter because it's "verifiability, not truth". If you can find something from NAV CAN that is newer then that could be used. However, until then the wrong numbers are all that Wikipedia can use. I also know that both Yellowknife and Whithorse never got turned into FIC's. And I just thought that the CFS shows that there are only five and that could be included. Just curious but do you work in CZNB? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 20:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that I didn't think to look in the AIC and will change based on that, nor did I stop to think that the CFS would work as an updated source. As to YYB being an IFSS. I thought that CZNB was the IFSS (and Arctic Radio, which is what the CFS says) and that YYB was the airport/FSS? Also how many radar sites are there? There are now two different figures for that as well, 45 or 46. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:18, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the information at NAV CANADA should Yellowknife be removed from the list of FIC's as of January 18th? Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]